Legislature(2011 - 2012)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
04/03/2012 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB252 | |
| HB301 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 252 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 301 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 128 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 301-BOATING REGULATION: SUNSET/ENFORCEMENT
1:53:43 PM
VICE CHAIR PASKVAN announced consideration of HB 301 [CSHB
301(FIN), version 27-LS1152\M, was before the committee].
1:53:48 PM
ASTRID LIEVANO, staff to Representative Alan Austerman,
introduced herself and said Representative Austerman was in a
House Finance Committee meeting right now and sent his regrets.
SENATOR DAVIS moved to bring SCS CSHB 301( ), version 27-
LS1152\B, before the committee.
VICE CHAIR PASKVAN objected for discussion purposes.
MS. LIEVANO said the purpose of HB 301 was to repeal the sunset
date of the Alaska Boating Safety Program. Without legislative
action, the program would terminate on July 1, 2013. When the
program was established in the 21st Legislature, it cautiously
added two sunset clauses; one repealed the Boating Safety
Program by date and the second repealed it in case the federal
funds didn't come through. Since the program was established,
the legislature has acted three times to extend it. It has now
been in effect for 12 years and thanks to the "Kids Don't Float"
a loaner life jacket program, at least 22 children have survived
a water emergency.
MS. LIEVANO explained that federal financial assistance is
provided through the "Boating Safety Account for the Aquatic
Resource Trust Fund," also known as the "Sport Fish Restoration
and Boating Trust Fund." Alaska met the eligibility requirements
to receive the funds in the year 2000 with the passage of HB
108, the Alaska Boating Safety Act.
She said that sections 1 and 2 of the bill were added by the
House and the wording is related to the federal government not
being able to enforce or exercise enforcement in state
waterways. This wording already exists in statute, and it was
the will of the Finance Committee to put it in this section.
Section 3 is the meat of the bill and has the sunset repealer
requirements. Section 4 is the effective date of section 2 and
section 5 is the effective date of section 3.
1:56:48 PM
MS. LIEVANO explained that the CS broadens a statutory reference
in sections 1 and 2 of the bill that was too narrowly written
according to the Attorney General's Office. She said a
representative from that office was on line to speak to it.
VICE CHAIR PASKVAN added that sections 1 and 2 were substantive
additions that went beyond the sponsor's intent and weren't
connected to the sunset provisions.
MS. LIEVANO said that was correct.
1:58:06 PM
JANE SCHULTZ, Kenai Peninsula Emergency Services, Kenai, said
she had attended the Boating Safety class and that it is
excellent. It's provided free of charge and goes all over the
state. In her job she gets many calls asking where this
information can be obtained, and she directs them to the Office
of Boating Safety. It has kids' books that they are willing to
share and videos on boating safety. They provide a pre-departure
check list and a float plan for people and encouragement to use
it. Their posters are all over the state providing information
on boating safety. One is called the "Choose LIFE Poster."
"LIFE" stands for "use your Life jacket, Inspect your boat, File
a Float plan and get continuing Education." It is a very
worthwhile program.
2:00:12 PM
MS. SCHULTZ said the "Kids Don't Float program" is a tremendous
life saver. She didn't see any need for the sunset clause and
encouraged passage of HB 301.
VICE CHAIR PASKVAN asked the assistant attorney general to walk
them through the department's legal concerns.
2:01:31 PM
JOHN BAKER, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Natural
Resources Section, Department of Law (DOL), said Ms. Lievano
accurately summarized the history of the program. He explained
that most of the past amendments (mostly extending the sunset)
had been directed at the conditional sunset date and were
required to be achieved by special session laws rather than
through amendments to the permanent statute. That may have led
to some confusion in the process of an amendment that came out
from the House Finance Committee CS.
He said the only concern DOL had was with two very narrow
provisions in sections 1 and 2 that have brief references to AS
12.25, the citation authority. For reasons not entirely clear,
the House Finance CS would substitute only one section of that
law for the original version in statute, which would make all of
AS 12.25 applicable to citations issued by officers enforcing
the Boating Safety Program. The complication in that provision
is that it would lead to other sections in AS 12.25 being
exempted from citations under the program - for instance,
uniform citation format, notice requirements for citations that
are issued, whether the normal bail forfeiture schedule would
apply to citations and disposition of records if an individual
were cited. It raises questions as to whether any of those
provisions would apply, and they apparently would not. It's
their working assumption that the change was an error.
MR. BAKER said he consulted with Assistant Attorney General
Annie Carpenetti in the Criminal Division, and she concurred
that it would be problematic to change the format and have only
one section of that statute apply to citations. That was their
only objection to the House Finance CS. He said they had no
objection to the substantive amendment in sections 1 and 2,
which clarifies that federal officials wouldn't be able to
enforce the act.
VICE CHAIR PASKVAN asked if the Attorney General's Office favors
section 1 as currently written.
MR. BAKER replied yes. The recommendation would be the current
language in sections 1 and 2 that refers to "peace officer may
issue a citation as provided in AS 12.25.175 through AS
12.25.230" and then repeat that language again in section 2.
2:06:23 PM
VICE CHAIR PASKVAN asked if the problem was in the current
version.
MR. BAKER answered that version B had the correct language.
SENATOR DAVIS asked if he was okay with section 3 in version B,
also.
MR. BAKER answered yes.
VICE CHAIR PASKVAN closed public testimony and said he would
hold HB 301 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 301 CS FIN v B.PDF |
SL&C 4/3/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 301 |
| HB 301(FIN) Amendment.pdf |
SL&C 4/3/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 301 |
| HB 301 email re technical amendment to CS FIN.PDF |
SL&C 4/3/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 301 |
| HB 252 - Explanation of Changes - CSHB252(L&C) vs. CSHB252(FIN).pdf |
SL&C 4/3/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 252 |
| HB 252 - re FN #2 - DOR 031212, 1 of 2.pdf |
SL&C 4/3/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 252 |
| HB 252 - Fiscal Note 2 - Revenue - HB0252-1-2-022412-REV-Y.PDF |
SL&C 4/3/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 252 |
| HB 252 - re FN #2 - DOR 031212, 2 of 2.pdf |
SL&C 4/3/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 252 |
| HB 252 - lttr supporting, AEDC 031912.pdf |
SL&C 4/3/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 252 |
| HB 252 - Reference Information - Excluded and Qualifying Industries Under HB 252.pdf |
SL&C 4/3/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 252 |
| HB 252 - Bill Version D (CSHB 252 (FIN)).PDF |
SL&C 4/3/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 252 |
| SB 217 lttr supporting, Fred Meyer, FM 040412.pdf |
SL&C 4/3/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 217 |