Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 106
03/08/2010 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB360 | |
| HB297 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 360 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 297 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 206 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 297-POSTSECONDARY SCHOLARSHIPS
9:38:04 AM
CHAIR SEATON announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 297, "An Act establishing the governor's
performance scholarship program and relating to the program;
establishing the governor's performance scholarship fund and
relating to the fund; relating to student records; making
conforming amendments; and providing for an effective date."
9:38:18 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON moved CSHB 297, 26-GH2771\R, Mischel,
3/4/10. There being no objection, Version R was before the
committee.
9:40:12 AM
CHAIR SEATON asked Legislative Legal and Research Services,
Legislative Affairs Agency, for comments on Version R.
9:40:31 AM
JEAN MISCHEL, Attorney, Legislative Legal and Research Services,
Legislative Affairs Agency, said that legal services had
reviewed the changes to the governor's bill to ensure
consistency with the drafting rules established by legislative
counsel. To maintain that consistency, new sections have been
added to HB 297. She advised that although the Postsecondary
Education Commission, Department of Education and Early
Development, may find the section pertaining to them
unnecessary, the other changes are consistent with drafting
rules. As an example of minor changes, she directed attention
to page 1, lines 10-11, to indicate the language change from "a
student's permanent record" to "the student's permanent record."
Also in that section was a change from "any errors" to "an
error." More significantly, a new paragraph (18) was added on
page 4, line 5. Version R also added a new section to Sec. 4 on
page 5, line 16.
9:43:26 AM
MS. MISCHEL explained the new section was not reflective of any
amendment, but was a means to include the governor's performance
scholarship in a cross-reference found on page 7, line 5. The
new language on page 7, line 5, added the range of authorities
for the corporations to enter into agreements with the
Postsecondary Education Commission to include the governor's
performance scholarship. This authority may or may not be
necessary for the agreements, but it was deemed appropriate to
include it in the section.
9:44:45 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON asked for clarification on the
referenced corporation.
9:45:27 AM
MS. MISCHEL responded that the referenced corporation was the
student loan corporation. In further response to Representative
Peggy Wilson, she explained that legal services added a cross-
reference to the existing student loan corporation authority,
"to incorporate the governor's scholarship program, so the only
change to existing law ... was add to the range of authorities
for entering into agreements between the student loan
corporation and the postsecondary [education] commission."
9:46:14 AM
CHAIR SEATON interjected that the statutes for inclusion in HB
297 are being expanded from AS 14.43.091-14.43.750 to continue
through 14.43.890, effectively including the governor's
performance scholarship into duties that the student loan
corporation administers.
MS. MISCHEL concurred. She then said, "All we are doing is
including the new governor's scholarship program within existing
student loan corporation authority."
9:47:27 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON asked whether there were substantive
changes in Version R.
9:47:45 AM
MS. MISCHEL explained that Version R incorporated the seven
amendments adopted by the committee in previous hearings, and
made technical changes to comply with drafting rules. The only
technical change made by her office which could be construed as
substantive, was the insertion into Sec. 4, which did not exist
in Version A of the bill.
9:50:36 AM
CHAIR SEATON observed the addition to Sec. 4 was necessary as
the bill was originally drafted by the Department of Law, and
not by Legislative Legal and Research.
9:51:13 AM
MS. MISCHEL stated her comments at this time were limited to
technical changes, and indicated that beginning on page 8, a
series of grammatical changes were made. On page 18, Sec. 8
provides a necessary cross-reference to AS 36.30.850(b) that
allows an exception to the state procurement code for the
scholarships. Furthermore, technical changes were made to the
existing law that would eliminate non-applicable paragraphs.
9:55:08 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER offered conceptual Amendment 1 to Version
R, effectively repealing Amendment 9 to the original bill,
adopted on 2/26/10, and included in Version R. She advised that
this action was in response to written testimony from Diane
Barrans, Executive Director, Postsecondary Education Commission,
dated 3/3/10 [available in the committee packet]. She further
explained that the cost of the unintended consequence from
Amendment 9 would be greater than the value; specifically, if a
student received an "over award" scholarship they would not
qualify for other aid.
9:57:12 AM
CHAIR SEATON objected for the purpose of discussion.
9:57:26 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON asked where Amendment 9 appeared in
Version R.
9:57:44 AM
MS. MISCHEL directed attention to page 16, lines 14-16, and the
language to be deleted by adopting conceptual Amendment 1 which
read: "less any scholarship award payments previously expended
if the error, in the award of the scholarship was not due to any
fault of the student."
9:58:25 AM
CHAIR SEATON removed his objection. There being no further
objection, conceptual Amendment 1 to HB 297, Version R, was
adopted.
9:59:17 AM
CHAIR SEATON requested that the committee finish its review of
the bill, and stated his intention to pass the bill out of
committee by the end of the week. Written questions were
solicited from the committee to be submitted to EED for
comments.
10:01:23 AM
CHAIR SEATON announced that HB 297 was held for further review.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 206 Version P February 4, 2010.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 2/10/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 2/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 2/19/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/1/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/8/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/17/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 206 |
| CS HB 297 GPS Work-Draft.pdf |
HEDC 3/8/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 297 |
| HB 360 Work-Draft.pdf |
HEDC 3/8/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 360 |
| HB 297 ACPE response.pdf |
HEDC 3/8/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 297 |
| HB 360 legal opinion.pdf |
HEDC 3/8/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 360 |
| HB 206 version P Sponsor Statement February 4, 2010.docx |
HEDC 2/5/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 2/10/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 2/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 2/19/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/1/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/8/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/17/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 206 |
| HB 206 Version P Amendment.pdf |
HEDC 2/19/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/1/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/8/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/17/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 206 |