Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
02/28/2024 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
Presentation(s): Annual Mining Update | |
HB282 | |
HB296 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | HB 282 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SB 92 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 296 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 296-AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS/LOANS/SALES 2:17:58 PM CHAIR MCKAY announced that the final order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 296, "An Act relating to the powers of the board of agriculture and conservation; relating to loans and limitations under the Alaska Agricultural Loan Act; relating to federal crop insurance contributions; relating to municipal and state procurement preferences for agricultural products harvested in the state and fisheries products harvested or processed in the state; and providing for an effective date." [Before the committee, adopted as a working document on 2/23/24 and amended, was CS for HB 296, Version 33-GH2386\B, Bullard, 2/12/24 ("Version B").] CHAIR MCKAY entertained [further] amendments. 2:18:29 PM REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER moved to adopt Amendment [7] to HB 296, labeled 33-GH2386\B.14, Bullard, 2/24/24, which read as follows: Page 10, following line 25: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 25. The uncodified law of the State of Alaska is amended by adding a new section to read: INSTITUTIONAL PURCHASING PROCESS REVIEW AND REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE. (a) The director of the division of the Department of Natural Resources with responsibility for agriculture, in collaboration with the chief procurement officer appointed under AS 36.30.010, shall prepare a report containing recommendations as to how state procurement processes may be amended to purchase greater quantities of agricultural products harvested in the state. In preparing the report, the director shall consult with, and solicit recommendations from, state agricultural producers, distributors, and agency buyers. The report must include (1) a review of state agency contracting and procurement processes to identify opportunities for the agencies to procure greater quantities of agricultural products harvested in the state and related findings; (2) recommendations as to how existing state agency procurement practices, policies, regulations, or state statutes could be amended to facilitate state agencies purchase of agricultural products harvested in the state; and (3) a description of the result of collaboration with state agricultural producers, distributors, and agency buyers. (b) The director of the division of the Department of Natural Resources with responsibility for agriculture, in collaboration with the chief procurement officer appointed under AS 36.30.010, shall submit the report to the senate secretary and chief clerk of the house of representatives on or before the first day of the First Regular Session of the Thirty-Fourth Alaska State Legislature, and notify the legislature that the report is available." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 11, line 17: Delete "Sections 1 and 26" Insert "Sections 1 and 27" CHAIR MCKAY objected for the purpose of discussion. 2:19:01 PM CRAIG VALDEZ, Staff, Representative George Rauscher, Alaska State Legislature, explained that the amendment was in regard to procurement and other factors made to the legislature regarding the Crop Act. 2:20:34 PM REPRESENTATIVE ARMSTRONG asked whether the department anticipated any costs. 2:20:42 PM BRENT GOODRUM, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Natural Resources, said the amendment was an additional reporting requirement led by the director of the Division of Agriculture, and the department noted it would increase the fiscal impact of the bill. REPRESENTATIVE ARMSTRONG asked Mr. Goodrum whether he supported the amendment. MR. GOODRUM answered that it is an area that needed more work and better suited to other arenas. 2:22:19 PM REPRESENTATIVE MEARS noted that her office recognized that procurement was a powerful tool in Alaska and there must be more understanding towards meaningful changes to policy. 2:23:06 PM REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER [moved to] withdraw Amendment [7]. 2:23:22 PM REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked Deputy Commissioner Goodrum to expand on the resources and qualifications needed. 2:23:40 PM MR. GOODRUM said procurement statewide is a big issue and a topic that has "many different tentacles," and far beyond the scope of what his director needed to be focused on in the upcoming growing season. 2:24:49 PM CHAIR MCKAY removed his objection and announced that [there being no objection], Amendment [7] had been withdrawn. 2:25:03 PM REPRESENTATIVE MEARS moved to adopt Amendment [8] to HB 296, labeled 33-GH2386\B.15, Bullard, 2/26/24, which read as follows: Page 2, line 5: Delete "or" Insert "[OR]" Page 2, line 6, following "machinery;": Insert "or (v) in-state manufacturing of food or production of animal feed;" Page 2, line 16: Delete "or" Page 2, line 17, following "state;": Insert "or (vi) in-state manufacturing of food or production of animal feed;" CHAIR MCKAY objected for the purpose of discussion. REPRESENTATIVE MEARS said the amendment focused on manufacturing not just food for people but feed for animals. 2:26:45 PM REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked about the size or value of food production for humans and production for animal feed. REPRESENTATIVE MEARS answered that she didn't have that scope in front of her. 2:27:20 PM REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER questioned what DNR would have to say about the amendment. 2:27:28 PM MR. GOODRUM confirmed that DNR was supportive of Amendment [8]. 2:28:08 PM REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER restated his earlier question regarding the authorization for loans. MR. GOODRUM mirrored Representative Mears and stated it is not understood at this moment. REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER noted his concern over providing too much money or not enough. MR. GOODRUM confirmed that DNR was looking to add value to the market. 2:29:44 PM REPRESENTATIVE MEARS recalled the revolving loan fund being underutilized; therefore, having opportunity for larger amounts and much needed manufacturing included would be beneficial to the state. 2:30:13 PM CHAIR MCKAY removed his objection. [There being no further objection, Amendment 8 was adopted.] 2:30:20 PM The committee took a brief at-ease at 2:30 p.m. 2:30:37 PM REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER moved to report CSHB 296, Version 33- GH2386\B, Bullard, 2/12/24, as amended, out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes and to give Legislative Legal Services the authority to make technical and conforming changes. There being no objection, CSHB 296(RES) was reported out of the House Resources Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 296 amendment B.15.pdf |
HRES 2/28/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 296 |
HB 296 amendment B.14.pdf |
HRES 2/28/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 296 |
HB 282 amendment A.1.pdf |
HRES 2/28/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 282 |
HRES Mining Update NMA slides 2024-02-28.pdf |
HRES 2/28/2024 1:00:00 PM |
|
HRES Mining Update 2024-02-28 .pdf |
HRES 2/28/2024 1:00:00 PM |