Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
03/22/2024 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB295 | |
| HB387 | |
| HB388 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| * | HB 388 | ||
| += | HB 295 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 349 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 387 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 295-SALMON HATCHERY PERMITS
1:14:47 PM
CHAIR MCKAY announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 295, "An Act relating to salmon hatchery permits;
and authorizing the sale of salmon to permitted persons for
stocking lakes." [Before the committee was CSHB 295(FSH).]
1:15:19 PM
CHAIR MCKAY opened public testimony on CSHB 295(FSH).
1:16:13 PM
ALBERT SMITH, Mayor, Metlakatla Indian Community, asked the
committee to consider amending CSHB 295(FSH) to have the
Metlakatla Indian Community qualify for the hatcheries revolving
loan funds. He explained that since the Annette Islands Indian
Reserve is a sovereign nation, it is not subject to state
regulation oversight. He posited that since the hatchery that
Metlakatla maintains benefits all Southeast Alaska, it would be
within the state's fisheries enhancement goals to amend AS
16.10.510 to expand the authorization of the loans to the
Metlakatla Indian Community.
1:18:56 PM
NANCY HILLSTRAND, Owner, Pioneer Alaskan Fisheries, Coal Point
Trading, requested for the committee to amend CSHB 295(FSH) to
remove Section 2. She attested that the intent of AS
16.10.440(b) was stated in March 1979 to clarify the Alaska
Board of Fisheries was to regulate salmon returning to the
waters of Alaska, and that rule extends to regulating those fish
that are returning as a result of releases from natural systems
and hatcheries. She added there is a significant number of
vacant positions in the Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G)
and she is worried about how the implementation of the bill
would be affected without providing more money and staffing.
She expressed concern over data collection and referred to a
comment made by the chief scientist at an Alaska Board of
Fisheries Hatchery Committee meeting requesting an Academy of
Sciences Panel to avoid making piecemeal progress.
1:22:38 PM
GALE VICK, representing self, stated she opposed CSHB 295(FSH)
because the bill does not require private nonprofit (PNP)
hatchery fish sold to the public to be sterile. She emphasized
the potential for a non-sterile fish with different genetics to
the local population to be introduced to a wild stream.
1:25:05 PM
ALAN PARKS, representing self, concurred with the previous two
testimonies.
1:26:07 PM
MIKE KRAMER, representing self, said he is opposed to CSHB
295(FSH) and disagreed that the bill would clarify the
commissioner's authority over fish hatcheries. He referenced
two formal opinions from the Alaska attorney general that the
Board of Fisheries has the authority to regulate egg take and
harvest areas for hatcheries. He additionally opposed extending
the loan program due to many PNP hatcheries being in debt.
1:29:19 PM
SHANNON MARTIN, Executive Director, Kenai River Sportfishing
Association, stated the association was opposed to CSHB 295(FSH)
due to the introduction of the word "wild" into AS 16.10.440(b)
which would remove the power of the Board of Fisheries to
regulate hatchery egg take and release levels. She emphasized
that the Board of Fisheries gives the public a valuable platform
to influence regulation and provide transparency. She cited a
memo from the Department of Law (DOL), which read as follows:
The department and the Board share regulatory
authority over private, nonprofit hatcheries.
Although primary responsibility over permitting and
the administration of the hatchery program rests with
the department, the Board has substantial, indirect
control over hatchery production by virtue of its
regulatory authority to amend hatchery permits with
respect to special harvest areas, the harvest of brood
stock, and cost-recovery fish.
1:31:26 PM
CHAIR MCKAY, after ascertaining there was no one else who wished
to testify, closed public testimony on CSHB 295(FSH).
CHAIR MCKAY announced CSHB 295(FSH) was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 387 Am. Packet.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 387 |
| HB 388 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
| HB 388 ver. A.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
| HB 388 Sectional Analysis Version A.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
| HB 388 Presentation (HRES).pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
| HB 388 Fiscal Note #1 DCCED-AEAREA.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
| HB 388 Fiscal Note #2 DCCED-AIDEA.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
| CSHB 388(RES) LS-1237U.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
| CSHB 388(RES) LS-1237U Summary of Changes.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |