Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
03/22/2024 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB295 | |
HB387 | |
HB388 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
* | HB 388 | ||
+= | HB 295 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 349 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 387 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 295-SALMON HATCHERY PERMITS 1:14:47 PM CHAIR MCKAY announced that the first order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 295, "An Act relating to salmon hatchery permits; and authorizing the sale of salmon to permitted persons for stocking lakes." [Before the committee was CSHB 295(FSH).] 1:15:19 PM CHAIR MCKAY opened public testimony on HB 295. 1:16:13 PM ALBERT SMITH, Mayor, Metlakatla Indian Community, asked the committee to consider amending CSHB 295(FSH) to have the Metlakatla Indian Community qualify for the hatcheries revolving loan funds. He explained that since the Annette Islands Indian Reservation is a sovereign nation it does not align with the principles of the reservation to secure a permit for the state loan funds. He posited that since the hatchery that Metlakatla maintains benefits all Southeast Alaska, it would be within the state's fisheries enhancement goals to amend AS 16.10.510 to expand the authorization of the loans to the Metlakatla Indian Community. 1:18:56 PM NANCY HILLSTRAND, Owner, Pioneer Alaskan Fisheries, Coal Point Trading, requested for the committee to amend CSHB 295(FSH) to remove Section 2, she attested that the intent of AS 16.10.440(b) was stated in March 1979 to clarify the Alaska Board of Fisheries was to regulate salmon returning to the waters of Alaska, and that rule extends to regulating those fish that are returning as a result of releases from natural system and hatcheries. She added there is a significant number of vacant positions in the Alaska Department of Fish & Game and she is worried about how the implementation of the bill would be affected without providing more money and staffing. She expressed concern over data collection and referred to a comment made by the chief scientist at an Alaska Board of Fisheries, Hatchery Committee meeting requesting an Academy of Sciences Panel to avoid making piecemeal progress. 1:22:38 PM GALE VICK, representing self, stated she opposed CSHB 295(FSH) because the bill does not require private nonprofit (PNP) hatchery fish sold to the public to be sterile. She emphasized the potential for a non-sterile fish with different genetics to the local population to be introduced to a wild stream. 1:25:05 PM ALAN PARKS, representing self, concurred with the previous two testimonies. 1:26:07 PM MIKE KRAMER, representing self, said he is opposed to CSHB 295(FSH) and disagreed that the bill would clarify the commissioner's authority over fish hatcheries. He referenced two formal opinions from the Alaska attorney general that the Board of Fisheries has the authority to regulate egg take and harvest areas for hatcheries. He additionally opposed extending the loan program due to many PNP hatcheries being in debt. 1:29:19 PM SHANNON MARTIN, Executive Director, Kenai River Sportfishing Association, stated the association was opposed to CSHB 295(FSH) due to the introduction of the word "wild" into AS 16.10.440(b) which would remove the power of the Board of Fisheries to regulate hatchery egg take and release levels. She emphasized that the Board of Fisheries gives the public a valuable platform to influence regulation and provide transparency. She cited a memo from the Department of Law, which read as follows: "The department and the Board share regulatory authority over private, nonprofit hatcheries. Although primary responsibility over permitting and the administration of the hatchery program rests with the department, the Board has substantial, indirect control over hatchery production by virtue of its regulatory authority to amend hatchery permits with respect to special harvest areas, the harvest of brood stock, and cost-recovery fish." 1:31:26 PM CHAIR MCKAY closed public testimony on CSHB 295(FSH). CHAIR MCKAY announced CSHB 295(FSH) was held over.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 387 Am. Packet.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 387 |
HB 388 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
HB 388 ver. A.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
HB 388 Sectional Analysis Version A.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
HB 388 Presentation (HRES).pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
HB 388 Fiscal Note #1 DCCED-AEAREA.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
HB 388 Fiscal Note #2 DCCED-AIDEA.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
CSHB 388(RES) LS-1237U.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |
CSHB 388(RES) LS-1237U Summary of Changes.pdf |
HRES 3/22/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 388 |