Legislature(2007 - 2008)
04/09/2008 10:24 AM Senate FIN
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 294(TRA) am
"An Act establishing the Alaska Marine Transportation
Advisory Board and setting out its powers and duties;
making conforming amendments; and providing for an
effective date."
CLIFF STONE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE PEGGY WILSON, explained
that the bill started off as a quasi-independent authority
board. A compromise was worked out with the House
Transportation Committee and the Alaska Marine
Transportation Advisory Board (AMTAB). The bill sets the
Board into statute.
Mr. Stone walked the Committee through the bill. On page 1,
the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities now
has to consult with AMTAB. On page 2, the board makeup has
been increased from 9 to 11 members in order to broaden the
scope and create more advocates. On line 22, it was not the
intent of the bill sponsors to create the impression that
there were two union seats on the board. The Governor's
office now understands the intent to have one position
include someone with Coast Guard, Navy, or Merchant Marine
experience.
7:01:24 PM
Mr. Stone noted that at least one member from the Ketchikan
Gateway Borough must be included on the board, and two
members who are residents of areas not served by the Alaska
marine highway also must be on the board. He explained that
after the commissioner of the transportation and public
facilities has considered one or more candidates for the
position of director or deputy commissioner of the Alaska
marine highway system, the commissioner shall confer with
the board about the position.
Mr. Stone highlighted the most popular part of the bill,
"the board may establish volunteer regional advisory
committees". The sponsors included this language to broaden
the users of the marine highway system. There is language
that a current AMTAB board member could be reappointed to
the board.
Mr. Stone said there was a zero fiscal note.
Co-Chair Stedman asked how the rotation of the board works.
Mr. Stone referred to Section 3 of the bill to explain
initial appointments and length of service. Co-Chair
Stedman commented that the seats are three-year terms and
there is a staggered start up.
Senator Huggins referred to page 3, line 15, and asked if
any consideration was given for the location of the
meetings. Mr. Stone said none was given.
7:04:30 PM
Senator Elton had concerns about continuity throughout the
bill. He asked about Section 1, page 1, the initial long-
range plan. He wondered if the board would be involved in
the update of the plan. He referred to page 3, line 30,
where it says the commissioner shall confer with the board
regarding the candidates. He voiced concern about the
wording. On page 4, line 9, he addressed the wording
"submit that plan to the department for its consideration".
He voiced concerns about "lack of teeth" in the bill.
7:07:25 PM
Senator Olson referred to the bottom of page 2, where a
member of the Ketchikan borough is included. He asked why
Ketchikan was singled out. Mr. Stone noted subsections A-E
had specific seats for those communities. The sponsors felt
it important to single out Ketchikan because it is a gateway
to Alaska.
7:08:49 PM
DAVE KENSINGER, PETERSBURG, stressed the importance of
having a board that provides important policy direction to
the marine highway system. He testified in support of the
bill.
7:10:53 PM
KATHY ROEMMICH, MARINE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD,
testified in support of the bill. She said she prefers to
see it for three years. The bill would provide a solid
foundation. She especially liked the fact that it includes
people in other parts of the state not located on the marine
highway. She thought that having more communities involved
would be a very positive thing.
7:13:50 PM
MARY SIROKY, SPECIAL ASSISTANT, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND PUBLIC FACILITIES, stated that the bill meets the needs
of DOT.
Senator Huggins wondered about the effective date of five
years for the board. Ms. Siroky thought that the department
would work with the AMTAB no matter how the bill was worded.
CSSS HB 294(TRA) am was heard and HELD in Committee for
further consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|