Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 106
02/16/2010 08:00 AM House STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB241 | |
| HB292 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 241 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 292 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 292-GRANTS TO DISASTER VICTIMS
9:43:07 AM
CHAIR LYNN announced that the final order of business was HOUSE
BILL NO. 292, "An Act relating to grants to victims of a
disaster in this state; and providing for an effective date."
9:43:43 AM
McHUGH PIERRE, Deputy Commissioner/Chief of Staff, Office of the
Commissioner/Adjutant General, Department of Military & Veterans
Affairs, presented HB 292 on behalf of the House Rules
Committee, sponsor by request of the governor. He said the
department gives out two disaster-related grants. One is for
public assistance, for example, to cover public utilities or
city infrastructure after a declared disaster. The other grant
is given to individual households and has a cap of $5,000. That
cap has not changed since 1977. Mr. Pierre noted that $5,000 in
1977 is equal to $18,000 in 2010. The proposed bill would
adjust the amount of the cap to connect it with the consumer
price index; it would be half of what the federal government
gives out during a disaster, which he opined is a reasonable
amount of money. Mr. Pierre deferred to Mr. O'Hare for further
details.
9:45:26 AM
MIKE O'HARE, Deputy Director, Division of Homeland
Security/Emergency Management, Department of Military & Veterans
Affairs, offered information regarding HB 292, on behalf of the
House Rules Committee, sponsor by request of the governor. He
stated that the proposed legislation would modernize the
individual assistance grant program to the current economy. He
said the department set up a multi-agency task force to
determine what, if any, increase is needed. The [task force]
was comprised of a diverse group of individuals, including those
from: the Department of Commerce, Community, & Economic
Development, the Department of Health and Social Services,
Alaska Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster (AKVOAD), the
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation, the American Red Cross, the
United States Department Agriculture (USDA), and rural
organizations. The model formulated by the task force would
make the grant cap half of the federal individual assistance,
which fluctuates with the economy through the consumer price
index. Currently, the maximum for the federal individual
assistance grant is approximately $30,000; therefore, the
proposed grant from the State of Alaska would be approximately
$15,000.
9:47:37 AM
MR. O'HARE said this proposed legislation came about after the
devastating floods in Interior Alaska in 2009, which affected 40
communities along the Yukon-Kuskokwim Rivers. These residents,
he reported, received federal individual assistance up to the
$30,000 maximum. He said there were approximately 30 victims of
the disaster in those communities who were not eligible because
they were not in that federally declared zone, and all the State
of Alaska was able to give those people was $5,000, which was
insufficient. Mr. O'Hare reiterated that under the proposed
legislation, during a state-declared disaster, the governor
would be allowed to provide up to half the [amount of the
federal] individual assistance grant program to those affected
in the disaster.
9:48:39 AM
MR. PIERRE emphasized that the state adheres to a strict and
stringent process by which it hands out the grant money. For
example, people are not automatically given the maximum amount.
Of the households affected in a disaster, about 30 percent
receive the maximum allowable amount, which Mr. Pierre
reiterated is currently $5,000. He explained that the money is
given in an effort to get people back on their feet to rebuild
their homes and lives. He offered further details related to
the determination of how much money a person is awarded. A
person who has money in the bank and is prepared for a disaster
may not receive any money at all, for example.
9:49:36 AM
MR. O'HARE said the department interviews victims and reviews
photographs to determine whether the victim does not have the
capability to make him/herself whole again without financial
help.
9:50:24 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG related his understanding that there
have been no claims under the state fund since the first of
2010. He then opined that it is not enough to increase the
amount given by the state to one half of that given by the
federal government. He said the people who need money have been
"wiped out" and are left with nothing. He asked why the cap is
proposed to be half, and he said he is prepared to offer an
amendment to increase the amount to "the maximum."
9:51:12 AM
MR. O'HARE answered that the concept of state declared disaster
is "a smaller version of a federally declared disaster."
Furthermore, state declared disasters happen more often. He
stated that the concept of giving money is an opportunity to
help in part of the process of a victim being whole again.
9:52:09 AM
MR. PIERRE added that the money the state pays comes through its
disaster relief fund, which is not supported by the federal
government. It would not be until a federal disaster is
declared that the State of Alaska would receive federal support,
and then it would be federal dollars that would be given as
individual assistance to the victims. He stated, "A household
... could not double-dip."
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG remarked that the fiscal note is about
$600,000.
9:52:57 AM
MR. O'HARE, in response to Representative Gruenberg, said the
fiscal note is speculative, because disasters cannot be
anticipated. He said the fiscal note reflects the increase from
the original $5,000 to an approximate $15,000. He indicated
that in one disaster, only 30-35 percent of applicants qualified
for the maximum $5,000. The aforementioned taskforce has said
the best model to follow would be half of the federal amount.
9:54:46 AM
MR. PIERRE, in response to Representative Gruenberg, emphasized
that the numbers of disaster victims affected would not be
changed by the proposed legislation. The numbers showing on the
fiscal note, he said, have been a good average since 2002. He
said changing the amount of the state's grant cap to equal that
of the federal grant would double the fiscal note. He related
that Alaska experiences 5-6 state disasters per year, and he
reiterated that not all of those disasters are eligible for
federal assistance. To illustrate his point, Mr. Pierre relayed
that in 2009, there were two disasters declared by the President
of the United States, while Alaska declared 3-4 state disasters.
Mr. Pierre stated that the one federally declared disaster was a
mud slide in Kodiak that was "not eligible for individual
assistance" - it was "only a public assistance disaster."
MR. PIERRE explained that in some disasters, only public
assistance - for roads and utilities - is awarded; public
assistance, he reminded the committee, is not awarded for damage
of individual homes. The bill addresses those who have
experience damage to their homes. He said the department
heavily emphasizes being proactive with the community and
lending a hand, rather than a full handout. He said there are
representatives from the department who travel to communities
that typically experience flooding to ask residents if they have
followed prevention tactics. The emphasis is in ensuring the
safety of these people.
9:57:22 AM
MR. PIERRE, in response to Representative Seaton, confirmed that
the fiscal note reflects the difference between the current
average and the proposed amount.
MR. O'HARE, in response to Representative Seaton, related that
in the past two-three years, the Alaska State Legislature had
the vision to forward-fund the disaster relief fund. Currently,
there are approximately $100,000 left in that fund. He added
that the department must obtain permission from the legislature
to spend more than $1 million per disaster. The department has
"a very good measure of capping expenditures" and a
responsibility to provide its finance plan to the legislature.
9:59:27 AM
MR. PIERRE, in response to a concern expressed by Representative
Gatto, said the state is not discriminating between rural and
urban residents. He explained that there are two types of
disasters described in statute: AS 26.26, which addresses
natural disasters, and AS 26.44, which addresses economic
disasters. He said economic disasters are handled by the
Department of Commerce, Community, & Economic Development.
Communities that experience disaster file a declaration to the
state. The state analyzes the declaration, and, if warranted,
holds a disaster policy cabinet to determine whether or not to
declare a state disaster based on the local response. The state
would ask the federal government for help once it has spent all
its resources.
MR. O'HARE, in response to a hypothetical example of a chemical
spill disaster offered by Representative Gatto, echoed Mr.
Pierre's outline of the steps that would be taken, first by the
community, next by the state, and finally by the federal
government, as necessary. He stated, "What we're talking about
here is ... individual assistance for the recovery of the
disaster." If the chemical spill had resulted in the death of
family members, the state could give money to help pay for
funeral costs. If the hypothetical spill had affected the
homes, the grant money could be applied.
10:03:46 AM
CHAIR LYNN announced that HB 292 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 16 ohio divestment policy.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 17 florida divestment policy.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 18 Congressional Report- Iran Sanctions.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 19 state-by-state divestment laws.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 02 HB0241A.pdf |
HSTA 2/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 04 sponsor statement HB 241.pdf |
HSTA 2/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 05 sectional summary HB 241 Version R.pdf |
HSTA 2/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 20 state-by-state scrutinized company lists.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 21 Louisiana Constructive Engagement Summary 02-2010.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 22 articles on recent iran developments.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 23 Louisiana Prohibited Nations Summary August 2009.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 01-B explanation of changes from 1st CSHB241 to 26-LS0680S.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 07 background info 1, HB 241.pdf |
HSTA 2/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 08 background info 2, HB 241.pdf |
HSTA 2/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 09 background info 3, HB 241.pdf |
HSTA 2/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 14 HB241-REV-TRS-02-05-10 Iran Divestiture.pdf |
HSTA 2/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| 01 HB0292A.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 292 |
| 02 gov letter hb 292.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 292 |
| 03 HB0292-1-2-011910-MVA-Y.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 292 |
| 04 hb 292 statute history.pdf |
HSTA 2/16/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 292 |