Legislature(2009 - 2010)HOUSE FINANCE 519
03/24/2010 09:00 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB291 | |
| HB292 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 291 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 292 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 292
"An Act relating to grants to victims of a disaster in
this state; and providing for an effective date."
MCHUGH PIERRE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY
AND VETERANS AFFAIRS (DMVA) presented an overview of the
bill. He spoke of the disaster last year in Eagle and other
communities along the Yukon River noting the disparity
between the individual assistance grants programs
established in 1977 compared to the federal grant amount.
When a disaster is declared by the President of the United
States, FEMA issues individual assistance grants based on a
number suggested by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which
last year was $30,300 per affected household. Mr. Pierre
noted that Alaska grants have not changed from $5000 and
this bill would make the amount for state declared
disasters half of the federal amount. The maximum this year
would be $14,950 per household affected.
MICHAEL O'HARE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF HOMELAND
SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, DMVA, stressed that
there is a very rigorous process for disaster victims to
prove their loss. Mr. O'Hare noted that his staff sets up a
local disaster assistance center in affected communities.
There is an involved application process with extensive
verification that the loss is real and sustained during the
declared disaster incident.
9:33:31 AM
Representative Gara asked if the Yukon River flooding was
the only disaster in past year. Mr. O'Hare noted a declared
federal disaster in Kodiak affecting critical
infrastructure. Representative Gara asked if this bill
would cover federal or state disasters. Mr. O'Hare replied
that it is specific to state declared disasters. He noted
that in the 2009 spring flood, most communities were
covered under the federal program, but there were about 30
families that did not qualify. All that could be provided
by the state was $5000. He reiterated that it is an
involved application process to collect funds.
Representative Gara asked for an example of someone who
could not be helped enough. Mr. O'Hare noted that there
have been individuals affected who did not fall under the
federal declaration. Representative Gara maintained that
there may still be people suffering from the 2009 flood.
Mr. O'Hare replied that those who did not qualify are
resorting to other methods. Representative Gara asked if
there would be any objection to going back to help those
from 2009 under this bill. Mr. O'Hare declared the bill is
not retroactive. Mr. Butcher added that great steps have
been taken to help those in need to receive volunteer and
donations from the community. Representative Gara noted
there could still be people in need of help from that
flood. Mr. Pierre responded that was correct, but most
needs have been met. The goal is get the individual back on
their feet, but not get them to the exact same point as
before the disaster. He clarified that there is no double
dipping into both state and federal assistance.
Representative Gara asked for those that were unable to be
helped would there be any benefit or substantial cost to
making this bill retroactive to January 1, 2009.
9:38:57 AM
Mr. O'Hare replied that those that only qualified for the
small amount were helped by volunteer and local groups. He
felt comfortable that they have been helped as best as
possible. Those individuals have not been made whole, but
they are recovering and progressing.
Representative Salmon inquired if the state pays any part
when a federal disaster is declared. Mr. O'Hare replied
that federal regulations cite that the state is responsible
for paying 25 percent of the recovery costs. Representative
Salmon asked if that was 25 percent of $30,000. Mr. O'Hare
replied that would be correct. He added that it does not
just cover the public assistance grants. If there is a
federally declared disaster the public and individual
assistance grant covers a much larger area.
9:41:07 AM
Representative Salmon inquired about the bigger costs, such
as power and roads, and wondered how those costs were
determined. Mr. O'Hare replied that they worked in
partnership with FEMA to arrive at the best economic
program to restore the critical infrastructure. He noted
that in Eagle there was an effort to get people out of the
way of future flooding paths. They have also worked with
the local power companies to not only restore services, but
prevent flood damage from happening again.
9:42:18 AM
Representative Joule remarked that this bill helps the
department to react to a disaster a little better. He
wondered if there are resources to help better planning so
the need to react is not as great. Mr. O'Hare reported that
the federal government does provide the division with
planning specific money from Homeland Security and FEMA to
go out into the communities to help them be better prepared
to respond. There have been many planning regional
workshops implemented to make them better prepared.
Mr. Pierre used the 2009 spring floods as an example and
noted that staff was sent to villages before the flood hit
to see what the effect might be and help the community to
be prepared.
Co-Chair Stoltze closed public testimony.
Co-Chair Stoltze referred to the new revised fiscal note.
9:45:00 AM
Mr. Pierre explained the fiscal note changes. He noted that
the money that goes to disaster grants comes out of the
disaster relief fund. The previous fiscal note showed an
increase of $900,000 total that would be spent as a worst
case scenario. He noted that realistically only about 30
percent of the applicants get the maximum mount so it will
never be the $900,000 increase that was shown. He
emphasized that no new funds were needed at this time to be
appropriated for the bill from this committee.
9:47:23 AM
Vice-Chair Thomas MOVED to report HB 292 out of Committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying new
fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
HB 292 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with a new zero fiscal note.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 02 HB 291 Vets Bonds Sponsor Statement[1].pdf |
HFIN 3/24/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 291 |
| Federal Veteran DefinitionL.pdf |
HFIN 3/24/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 291 |
| HB 291 Updated AHFC Vets Loan Activity[1].pdf |
HFIN 3/24/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 291 |
| HB 291 VetsL Sec Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 3/24/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 291 |
| HB292 Gov letter hb 292[1].pdf |
HFIN 3/24/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 292 |
| Hb 292 Statute history[1].pdf |
HFIN 3/24/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 292 |
| HB 292 NEW FN DMVA 03242010.pdf |
HFIN 3/24/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 292 |