Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 106
02/23/2010 08:00 AM House STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB291 | |
| HB289 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 291 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 289 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 291-GUARANTEED REVENUE BONDS FOR VETERANS
8:15:40 AM
CHAIR LYNN announced the first order of business was HOUSE BILL
NO. 291, "An Act relating to the issuance of state-guaranteed
revenue bonds by the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation to
finance mortgages for qualifying veterans; and providing for an
effective date."
8:16:19 AM
BRYAN BUTCHER, Director, Government Relations & Public Affairs,
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC), presented HB 291 on
behalf of the House Rules Committee, sponsor by request of the
governor. He stated that the proposed legislation would place
on the 2010 general election ballot a vote asking voters to
approve an additional $600 million of state-guaranteed bonds to
be issued by AHFC for the veterans' program.
MR. BUTCHER related his understanding that "the veterans'
program" was created in the U.S. Congress, and there was a small
window during which states could take advantage of that program.
Alaska was one of only five states to sign up, he said. The
other four states were: Oregon, California, Texas, and
Wisconsin. He indicated that prior to 1977, in order to
qualify, a veteran could not have been out of service for more
than 30 years. He said the veterans' program is the only one
for which AHFC needs a general obligation pledge of the state in
order to sell bonds.
MR. BUTCHER said AHFC has worked with the U.S. Congress for 15
years to lift the restrictions and open the program up to more
veterans. He indicated the reason for the lengthy effort was
because only five states were involved. He stated, "We thought
there might be interest in having all the states give this
program for their veterans. Unfortunately, that's not the way
most of Congress saw it." The requirement of 1977 was lifted
from federal law, but only through an agreement that AHFC would
be limited in selling only $10 million in bonds a year. He
remarked that when considering homes that cost $300,000-
$400,000, $10 million does not go far. After the restrictions
were lifted, there were more eligible veterans in the state, but
there was not much money.
MR. BUTCHER reported that two years ago, the limit on AHFC was
increased to $100 million, and now the program flourishes. He
continued:
And at this point, as we ran numbers, we realized that
2002 was the last time we had it go to a vote of the
people. It was $500 million authorized. Over 70
percent of the state voted to have it done. And once
we realized we now had a more brisk loan portfolio, we
realized that in all likelihood, sometime in 2011 we
were going to run out of funds for the program. So,
if we didn't get it on the general election ballot
this year, we may have to shut the program down well
before we get to a 2012 general election.
8:20:07 AM
CHAIR LYNN said he retired from the military in 1976, and he
asked if he would be eligible today for the program.
8:20:22 AM
MR. BUTCHER answered no, because currently a veteran cannot have
been out of active duty for more than 25 years.
CHAIR LYNN asked what the rationale was behind choosing 25 years
as a cut-off point. He remarked, "A veteran is a veteran is a
veteran."
8:21:04 AM
MR. BUTCHER reemphasized the challenges of working with U.S.
Congress as one out of only five states that adopted such a
program. He explained that U.S. Congress was concerned that tax
exempt bonds would take money out of the treasury. He said the
program from 1977 ended, and he said the chair of the federal
Ways and Means Committee told him he believes that everything
that sunsets should do so. Mr. Butcher said that sentiment is
frustrating those trying to keep this successful program
running. To illustrate that success, Mr. Butcher relayed that
Standard & Poor's reported a few weeks ago that AHFC's last bond
issuance for its veterans' program had the lowest delinquency
rate of any of the programs across the country. He indicated
that the veterans' program is AHFC's most successful program.
CHAIR LYNN responded, "I understand that, but ...
philosophically it's discriminating against a whole bunch of
veterans, and that discrimination really is age discrimination,
too."
8:22:40 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said he is a Vietnam War veteran. He
asked if a veteran is only allowed this loan once in a lifetime.
8:23:02 AM
JOE DUBLER, Finance Director, Bonds, Alaska Housing Finance
Corporation (AHFC), answered no. He said a veteran may
participate multiple times, but may have only one loan out at a
time.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG declared a conflict of interest related
to his forthcoming line of questioning.
CHAIR LYNN declared a conflict of interest.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON noted that "this definition" is in federal
law, not state law; therefore, the committee has no authority
over it, but may comment on it.
8:24:25 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked if AHFC could run a program at
the state level that was identical to the federal program, but
without [the 25-year] requirement.
8:25:12 AM
MR. BUTCHER answered that the federal program allows AHFC to
sell tax exempt bonds, which in turn allows AHFC to obtain a
lower interest rate than it can through its "general program."
Anyone who did not qualify under federal law would not be
eligible for tax exempt bonds, so AHFC would have to sell
taxable bonds.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked, "So, is there federal money
involved in this, or just tax exempt status?"
MR. BUTCHER responded, "Just tax exempt status."
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said that was not clear from the
information provided. He said he had been under the impression
that there was a "federal guarantee or federal money."
8:26:04 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON asked if the bonds are retired or are
cycled into AHFC for reissuance of additional mortgage.
8:26:33 AM
MR. BUTCHER responded that the payments AHFC gets from borrowers
are used to pay off debt. He explained that under federal tax
law and with certain restrictions, to the extent AHFC pays off
debt, it is able to reissue debt. He continued:
When we do that, for the purposes of state law and the
voters' authorization under the guaranteed program, we
reduce the amount of the voter authorization by the
refunded amount, as well. In other words, we're not
double counting for the state purposes. We do for the
feds because they allow it, but for the state we're
very conservative and do not.
8:27:24 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON stated his understanding that although
AHFC can reissue, it has to go back to voters to get approval to
guarantee the additional amount.
MR. DUBLER confirmed that AHFC cannot issue general obligation
bonds without the approval of the voters.
8:28:03 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked Mr. Butcher if he foresees AHFC
having a similar problem with U.S. Congress regarding a sunset
of the current federal law.
8:28:24 AM
MR. BUTCHER answered that the five states involved are
continually working with U.S. Congress. Currently, AHFC is
working to get the 25-year limit lifted so that the program
would apply to all veterans and to obtain permission to have
refinancing "as something that would qualify in the program."
He credited Congressman Bill Thomas from California for his work
on this issue.
8:29:28 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON said he would like an explanation of how
the issue of active duty relates to [the Alaska National Guard].
8:30:08 AM
LAURIE HOLTE, Residential Lending Officer, Urban and Residential
Loan Programs, Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC), stated
that if a [National] Guard member has been called to active duty
by the President for duty other than training, then he/she
becomes eligible for the program upon completion of that
obligation. Being called to duty by the State of Alaska is not
considered federal duty, she specified.
8:31:06 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON offered his understanding that active
National Guard members, having completed their initial period of
duty, which would entitle them to honorable discharge or
release, would qualify. He asked if they would remain eligible
if they went off active duty status.
MS. HOLTI answered yes.
8:32:48 AM
MR. DUBLER, in response to Representative Wilson, said if a
borrower does not pay back his/her mortgage, the corporation has
options. In most cases, there would be a Veterans
Administration or Federal Housing Administration (FHA)
guarantee, and AHFC would be able to receive from those entities
the difference between what AFHC is able to resell the house for
and what the borrower still owes on the mortgage. In the mid-
to late-'80s, the value of the homes being foreclosed was
smaller than the balance on the mortgages; however, currently
there is not a big decline in home value, so AHFC does not
anticipate that problem in the current environment. In response
to a follow-up comment from Representative Wilson, he confirmed
that bonds are paid off using the payments received from
veterans.
8:34:45 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG shared that he participated in the Navy
Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) program, from which he
graduated in 1965. He noted that those in military academies
are qualified, and he stated his assumption that is because
people attending those academies are considered on active duty.
He offered his understanding that ROTC participants are also
considered on active duty during their college years, and he
asked if any consideration had been made to include those in the
ROTC.
8:36:38 AM
MR. BUTCHER said he would bring that issue up during the next
conference call between the five aforementioned states and get
back to Representative Gruenberg with a response.
CHAIR LYNN offered his understanding that ROTC participants do
not qualify as being on active duty.
8:38:02 AM
MS. HOLTI, in response to Representative Petersen, said a
qualified veteran could use the program loan for a duplex,
triplex, or fourplex, as long as one unit is occupied by the
borrower.
8:38:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN offered his understand that this is a
good time to have a bond sale, especially considering Alaska's
"credit worthiness." He said he supports HB 291 and thinks a
majority of Alaskans will vote to continue supporting this
program.
8:39:22 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON questioned if the language in bill
should be changed to reflect that the veteran who borrows money
may do so for a multi-unit dwelling. She said, "So, what we're
really saying is we're helping them start a business."
8:40:10 AM
MR. DUBLER responded that the vast majority of loans given in
this program are for single-family homes. The definition of
residence for this purpose is "less than a fourplex". He stated
his understanding that that language is found also in federal
law. He said AHFC's first-time homebuyer program includes the
same stipulation. He concluded, "So, it's a federal issue, I
believe."
CHAIR LYNN proffered that sometimes the ability to get income
from the other units helps a person qualify for a home loan.
MR. DUBLER confirmed that is correct.
8:41:46 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON asked if there is any state subsidy in
this program.
MR. DUBLER replied yes. He relayed that the current interest
rate is 4.625 percent.
8:42:24 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked if there would be an explanation
of the proposed ballot measure in the election pamphlet.
MR. BUTCHER said he believes there was an explanation in the
2002 election information.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said he wants a definition of
"veterans" and "residences" provided to voters.
8:45:13 AM
MR. BUTCHER said AHFC could provide those definitions.
8:45:36 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON stated that even though this is related
to a federal program, the State of Alaska will be funding it
and, therefore, will be responsible.
MR. BUTCHER responded that that is correct. He clarified that
there are federal restrictions. Federal law allows the state to
choose whether to participate in the program.
8:46:18 AM
CHAIR LYNN, after ascertaining that there was no one else who
wished to testify, closed public testimony.
8:46:39 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON moved to report HB 291 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being no objection, HB 291 was reported out of the
House State Affairs Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 01 HB0291A.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 291 |
| 02 HB 291 Vets Bonds Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 291 |
| 03 HB291 AHFC Vets Sec Analysis.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 291 |
| 04 Updated AHFC Vets Loan Activity.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM |
|
| 05 HB291-DOR-AHFC-2-10-10.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 291 |
| 06 HB0291-1-1-011910-GOV-Y.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 291 |
| 01 HB 289 - Full Text.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 2/25/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 289 |
| 02 HB 289 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 2/25/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 289 |
| 03 HB 289 Sectional.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 2/25/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 289 |
| 04 Proposed Reg Changes.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 2/25/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 289 |
| 05 Legal Opinion 2-12-10 - Exec Ethics.HB 289 pdf.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 2/25/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 289 |
| 01A CS for HB 289.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 289 |
| 01B Explanation of Changes HB 289.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 289 |
| 06 HB289-OOG-EO-2-19-10.pdf |
HSTA 2/23/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 289 |