Legislature(1997 - 1998)
04/28/1998 01:35 PM Senate TRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CSHB 290(TRA) - LICENSE PLATES: RANCHES, FARMS, AND DAIRY
JEFF LOGAN, legislative assistant to Representative Joe Green,
sponsor of HB 290, explained the measure as follows. HB 290
broadens the definition of who can qualify as a person for the
purpose of qualifying for an agricultural license plate. Language
on lines 12-13 refers to AS 01.10.060, which defines a person as a
corporation, company, partnership, firm, association, organization,
and a few other entities. HB 290 was introduced at the request of
one of Representative Green's constituents. The constituent was a
farmer who formerly qualified for the agricultural license plates
by registering his vehicles under his company name. The Division
of Motor Vehicles (DMV) changed its interpretation of the statute
and required that people registering under the company name pay the
more expensive commercial fees. To pay the less expensive
agricultural fees, he would have to register the vehicles under his
personal name. Representative Green believes it is not up to any
state agency to tell any Alaska business how it will organize the
business, whether it be a corporation, sole proprietorship, etc.,
in order to get something that the business owner previously got
anyway. After about one year of trying to get DMV to change its
procedures, Representative Green introduced the bill.
SENATOR HALFORD stated he agrees with Representative Green's
intent, but he noted this restriction is abused in another area
which could be fixed under this bill. He explained that farmers
who have a bad year and seek seasonal employment elsewhere are
forced to register their farm vehicles outside of the agricultural
program if they did not earn their primary source of income from
farming during the year. Senator Halford said he would like to see
the language that requires the person's primary source of income be
from farming deleted so that the statute would read, "vehicles
under 16,000 pounds, owned by a person deriving income from the
operation of a ranch, farm, or dairy where the person resides full
time ...." He thought farm vehicles should not all of a sudden
become illegally registered because the farmer took winter work.
MR. LOGAN pointed out that agricultural vehicles are not on the
road as often as commercial vehicles, as they are seasonal
vehicles.
CHAIRMAN WARD asked if the sponsor would object to Senator
Halford's proposed amendment.
MR. LOGAN said he did not think the proposed amendment is
inconsistent with the goal of the legislation.
SENATOR HALFORD moved to delete the words, "the person's primary
source of" on line 7.
SENATOR LINCOLN questioned whether anyone who gets any income from,
and lives on, a farm or ranch would be eligible to get license
plates for a lower fee.
Number 520
SENATOR HALFORD explained the requirement is still restrictive in
that a person can register a vehicle under the agricultural
provision provided the vehicle is used exclusively to transport the
person's own ranch, farm or dairy products to and from market, or
to transport supplies, commodities or equipment to be used on a
person's ranch, farm or dairy.
SENATOR LINCOLN said that section would also allow a person with a
few chickens on his/her land to register any vehicle used to
transport chicken feed as agricultural. She objected to the motion
because she stated the current language requires the person's
primary source of income to be from agriculture, but not one's
exclusive source of income. She believed the amendment would open
up the reduced fee provision to many it is not intended for.
MR. LOGAN showed committee members a picture of a 16,000 pound
vehicle and stated, in regard to Senator Lincoln's concern, that it
would not be necessary to use a 16,000 pound vehicle to transport
chicken feed.
SENATOR LINCOLN clarified the bill requires vehicles to not exceed
16,000 pounds, therefore a person could be using a regular pick-up
truck. She maintained her objection to the amendment.
The motion to adopt Senator Halford's amendment carried with
Senators Halford, Wilken, Green, and Chairman Ward voting for the
motion, and Senator Lincoln voting against it.
SENATOR LINCOLN commented HB 290 is accompanies by a zero fiscal
note that contains an asterisk signifying an indeterminate cost.
She echoed Senator Halford's concern about not knowing the actual
cost of a piece of legislation.
SENATOR GREEN questioned whether the definition in the bill of
"agricultural" includes greenhouse nurseries.
MR. LOGAN replied under the definition given in AS 29.45.060(c),
greenhouses are included.
SENATOR GREEN moved SCSHB 290(TRA) from committee with individual
recommendations and its accompanying fiscal note, and a letter to
the Senate Finance Committee asking it to request an updated fiscal
note. There being no objection, the motion carried.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|