Legislature(2017 - 2018)CAPITOL 106
03/06/2018 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB351 | |
| HB290 | |
| HB268 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 351 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 290 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 268 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 290-CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION: MEMBERSHIP
4:11:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR announced that the next order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 290, "An Act relating to the membership
of the Alaska Criminal Justice Commission; and providing for an
effective date."
4:11:51 PM
VALERIE DAVIDSON, Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner,
Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS), stated that
favorable consideration for the proposed bill would be
appreciated.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR noted that an additional fiscal note had
been received from the Alaska Judicial Council.
4:12:58 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked Commissioner Davidson how her role
on the advisory committee would be enhanced by status as a
voting member as opposed to that as an advisory member.
COMMISSIONER DAVIDSON stated that a voting membership would
allow the Department of Health and Social Services to weigh in
on policy decisions considered by the Criminal Justice
Commission. Although both voting and non-voting members
participated in the deliberations of the meetings, those with a
vote have a greater opportunity to influence the outcome of the
policy decisions.
4:14:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN moved to adopt Amendment 1, labeled 30-
GH2586\A.2, Radford, 3/2/18, which read:
Page 2, line 15:
Delete "nonvoting member, serving ex officio, who
is a"
Insert "[NONVOTING MEMBER, SERVING EX OFFICIO,
WHO IS A]"
Page 2, line 17:
Delete "nonvoting member, serving ex officio, who
is a"
Insert "[NONVOTING MEMBER, SERVING EX OFFICIO,
WHO IS A]"
REPRESENTATIVE TARR objected for discussion.
4:14:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN stated that the proposed bill would add
two more voting members appointed by the governor to the
commission. He offered his belief that the Criminal Justice
Commission would become more a reflection of the governor's
cabinet, pointing out that the majority of the 13 voting members
of the board were appointed and served at the will of the
governor. He opined that the purpose of the commission was
larger than passing on the agenda of the governor. He suggested
that, as the reasons offered by Commissioner Davidson for a
voting membership were in line with the two non-voting
legislative members, it would be "only proper that we also add
these two legislative members to the voting category." He added
that it would preserve the larger role of the commission for
making recommendations inclusive of the judiciary, the
executive, and the legislative branches.
4:16:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSTON asked about the voting membership of
other boards and commissions with legislative ex-officio
members.
4:17:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN directed attention to a memo from
Legislative Legal Services and stated that it would not be
improper for the Criminal Justice Commission to have voting
members from all three branches of government. He offered an
example of another commission which had voting members from both
the House and the Senate.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSTON emphasized that these were very distinct
commissions with very different missions and asked for another
example. She asked if there were any state policy commissions
on which the legislature had voting members.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN said that he would also like to have that
information. He suggested that there were very few, if any,
similar commissions which, by design, were reflective of all
three branches of government and had more than one
representative from each.
4:19:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER stated that it would take a systematic
review to recognize which commissions and boards had voting
legislative members. He stated that, although this commission
did authorize judiciary votes, it denied that legislative
members have the right to vote, which he deemed to be
inconsistent. He declared his support for the proposed
Amendment 1.
4:19:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KITO shared that he had been appointed, as a
voting member, to an advisory committee to the Department of
Education and Early Development for bond reimbursement and grant
review. He reported that this position was identified very
specifically in statute. He offered his belief that this
commission was "a little bit broader" and that it became a
legislative policy call. He allowed that there could be a
concern if there were recommendations from the Criminal Justice
Commission to the Legislature while there were legislators on
the commission who had already voted, and the Legislature was
aware of the direction of those votes. He offered his belief
that there could be a conflict if legislators were offering
recommendations and having a vote on those recommendations. He
stated that he could see reasons for both allowing and not
allowing members to have voting rights and that it was up to the
committee members to determine whether it was appropriate.
4:21:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN offered his belief that it was a conscious
choice by the commission to not have legislators vote, as these
were policy recommendations to the legislature. The expectation
was that legislators would make their vote in the Capitol. He
offered his belief that the commission appreciated the
perspective from legislators for how things would be received in
the Capitol, and that a vote by legislators on the commission
"would probably unduly impact the commission deliberations." He
declared that he did not support the proposed amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN expressed his agreement that this was a
policy call, and that the proposed policy would be to add two
more voting members to the commission. He suggested that this
would offer the opportunity for the commission to have joint
representation from all three branches of government.
4:23:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR offered her belief that her service on a
council as a non-voting member and a citizen legislator allowed
the council to more easily reach a quorum when she was not
present. She expressed concern that legislative members could
limit or discourage conversation regarding proposals related to
funding as it may be unpopular.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER pointed out that the original premise for
the Criminal Justice Commission did not include the Commissioner
of the Department of Health and Social Services. He mused that
the premise for much of the state criminal policy was that much
of the criminogenic process was based on behavior. He stated
that, to the extent that behavioral health was increasingly a
factor in state correctional policy, the Commissioner of the
Department of Health and Social Services already had tremendous
influence on the dialogue and the policies that were pursued had
far more impact than an advisory position. He added that many
commissioners had multiple responsibilities on boards and
commissions, and that the designee often represented them at
board meetings.
4:28:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSTON asked what the legislators brought to
the table at the commission in order to be voters.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN stated that the question for legislators
interested in service on the Criminal Justice Commission was for
how active they should be, similar to the question for the level
of activity for the Commissioner of Department of Health and
Social Services. He shared that his desire to serve would be
prioritized differently, dependent on the role as a voting or
non-voting member. He declared that the message he wanted to
send was for the "legislators to be just as active as our
Commissioner." He acknowledged that, although legislators could
quash discussion based on funding concerns as non-voting
members, giving legislators the vote "tells them its important
and that it also encourages the Commission as their going
forward and making decisions to fully include the legislators."
4:31:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSTON opined that the commissioner was
bringing access to the department, whereas a legislator was
bringing a political agenda with the possibility to act on that
agenda. She acknowledged that this could go "both ways." She
pointed out that, as voting members, the legislators were
responsible for taking the policy of the commission to their
respective bodies. If they were non-voting members, they did
not have to champion the policy.
4:33:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER stated that it could be argued that
legislators could be some of the most effective members of the
Criminal Justice Commission, based on their broad experience and
perspective for state policy, funding constraints and
opportunities, and the necessity of coordinating different state
policy and law. He pointed out that legislators were a distinct
minority on the commission, and he opined that two voting
legislators would not be able to drive the agenda. He added
that the commission was an advisory commission for
recommendations. He noted that, as the judges would also be
able to take votes on criminal justice policy when cases came
through the judicial system they would also be required to
implement the same policies.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN pointed out that members of the judicial
branch on the Criminal Justice Commission were often declining
and recusing themselves from voting because they believed it was
a policy question that they may be called upon to act in a
judicial capacity. He stated that the judiciary viewed that
these issues "could come before them on the bench and they don't
want to have taken a position."
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER responded that this was the practice and
not the policy, and that this supported his argument.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSTON asked whether, once the commission
adopted a policy, a legislator would be responsible for
championing this policy in the legislature.
4:36:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN offered his belief that passage of the
proposed Amendment 1 would still allow that the now two voting
legislators would still be "outnumbered more than two to one
simply by the governor's cabinet." He declared that it would be
na?ve to assume that the governor's cabinet did not have a
political agenda. He opined that the commission members would
be well qualified and had a concern and passion for the work of
the commission. He stated that this was an opportunity to
encourage that commitment and passion by "making [the
legislators] a full voting member." He stated that having the
legislators as a lively part of the discussion was a value to be
brought back to the legislature after a recommendation had been
made. He opined that no commission member would feel obligated
to support a recommendation from the commission, regardless of
their vote.
4:39:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR maintained her objection to proposed
Amendment 1.
4:39:57 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Eastman and Saddler
(alternate) voted in favor of Amendment 1. Representatives
Tarr, Kito, Claman (alternate), Johnston, and Edgmon voted
against it. Therefore, Amendment 1 failed by a vote of 2 yeas -
5 nays.
4:40:48 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
4:41:23 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR brought the committee back to order.
4:41:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER said that he could not support the
proposed bill.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN said that adding a crime victim to the
commission as a voting member was good and would add to the
diversity of discussion, although he was less convinced to the
necessary addition of the commissioner of Department of Health
and Social Services as a voting member.
4:42:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER said that, as he had overlooked the
addition of a crime victim as a member of the commission, he
would revise his position on the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR pointed out that it was usually necessary to
add two voting members to a commission to maintain an odd number
of members.
4:43:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EDGMON moved to report HB 290, Version 30-
GH2586\A, out of committee with individual recommendations and
the accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection, HB 290
was moved from the House Health and Social Services Standing
Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB0290-1-2-011918-DHS-N.pdf |
HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB290 Fiscal Note DHSS--DSS 2.28.2018.pdf |
HHSS 3/1/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Sectional Analysis Ver A 01 22 18.pdf |
HHSS 3/1/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Transmittal Letter 01 22 18.pdf |
HHSS 3/1/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Supporting document - AK Crim Just Comm 2016 Report.pdf |
HHSS 3/1/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Supporting document - AK Crim Just Comm 2-2018 Recommendation.pdf |
HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB290 draft proposed amendment A.2 3.5.2018.pdf |
HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB290 Fiscal Note JUD--AJC 3.5.2018.pdf |
HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 351 Draft Proposed Amendment R.1 3.5.2018.pdf |
HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/8/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 351 |
| HB351 Sectional Analysis 3.5.2018.pdf |
HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/8/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 351 |
| HB351 Fiscal Note DHS--DJJ 3.5.2018.pdf |
HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/8/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 351 |
| HB351 Sponsor Statement 3.5.2018.pdf |
HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/8/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 351 |
| SSHB268 Sectional Analysis ver O 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Sponsor Statement 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-AK DHSS Opioid Addiction and Treatment Factsheet 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-AK DHSS Opioid Infographic 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-AK DHSS Heroin Use Infographic 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-AK DHSS Pain Treatment Handout 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-AMA Study 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-Article ADN AK Gov. Opioid Declaration 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-Article ADN AK Heroin Problem 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-Article Huffington Post 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-Article New Yorker 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-Article NIDA 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-Article The Star Press Opioids and Foster Care Indiana 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-Article VOX 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-CDC Checklist for Opioid Prescribers 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-New Jersey Legislature Relevant Opioid Statutes Doc 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-Report CDC Long Term Opioid Use 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document-STUFF Online Article on Alternative Pain Treatment in NZ 1.24.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB 268 Fiscal Note DCCED-CBPL 01.29.18.pdf |
HHSS 1/30/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Draft Proposed Blank CS ver R 2.14.18.pdf |
HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Explanation of Changes (O-R).pdf |
HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document--Anne Zink Support Letter 2.21.18.pdf |
HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document--Memos from Leg Legal 2.21.18.pdf |
HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| SSHB268 Supporting Document--Support Letters 2.14.18.pdf |
HHSS 2/22/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 2/27/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 268 |
| HB351 Supporting Document -- Letter from DJJ.pdf |
HHSS 3/6/2018 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/8/2018 3:00:00 PM |
HB 351 |