Legislature(2017 - 2018)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/05/2018 01:30 PM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB287 | |
| HB286 | |
| HB285 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 286 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 287 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 285 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 287(brf sup maj fld)
"An Act making appropriations for public education and
transportation of students; and providing for an
effective date."
2:38:02 PM
Vice-Chair Bishop MOVED to ADOPT proposed committee
substitute for HB 287, Work Draft 30-LS1229\R (Wallace,
3/23/18).
Co-Chair MacKinnon OBJECTED for discussion.
2:38:33 PM
AT EASE
2:40:06 PM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair MacKinnon relayed that the House had proposed
early funding for education and transportation The Senate
agreed that instability of educators, superintendents, and
students that were trying to learn. The proposed Committee
Substitute (CS) addressed that issue.
Co-Chair Hoffman thanked the House for its work on the
bill. He noted that the committee had not taken up the bill
until it had received the operating budget.
2:41:33 PM
PETE ECKLUND, STAFF, SENATOR LYMAN HOFFMAN, discussed the
proposed CS.
Mr. Ecklund looked at page 2, Section 1, which were
elements of K-12 aid that were held in the other body's
version of the bill. He stated that it was aid to different
school districts, and to Mt. Edgecumbe. He announced that
pages 3 and 4 were the funding sources contained in Section
1. He shared that page 5, Section 4 was the legislative
intent. He paraphrased that the intent instructed the
Department of Revenue (DOR) and the Permanent Fund
Corporation to work together to utilize the constitutional
budget reserve (CBR) borrowing language. The language was
in the FY 18 budget, and would appear in the FY 19 budget.
The language allowed the CBR to be used for cashflow
purposes in anticipation of general fund revenue. The
intent was for the permanent fund to make cash transfers to
the general fund in the most prudent way possible
throughout t the fiscal year. He looked at line 11, Section
5, which contained a 5.25 percent draw from the Earnings
Reserve Account (ERA). He explained that it was an
unstructured draw, because there was no current statute
that would instruct the draw. He remarked that there was
another bill, SB 26, which had a 5.25 percent draw. That
bill would have taken effect in FY 18, so the language
reflected the language in SB 26. He remarked that there was
a $726 million dividend paid in the prior year, so the
language took a 5.25 percent from the ERA, and subtracts
the dividend payment. The remainder was $1.792 billion,
which went to the general fund in FY 18. That money became
FY 18 revenue.
2:45:22 PM
Co-Chair MacKinnon asked if the budget from the House
contained a percentage draw.
Mr. Ecklund answered in the affirmative, and specified that
that the effective rate was a 4.21 percent effective rate.
Mr. Ecklund drew attention to Line 20 in Section 6, which
was fund capitalization for K-12 Base Student Allocation
(BSA) funding for FY 19. He stated that $1.89 billion was
fully funding the BSA for FY 19. He looked at Section B,
which was $78.1 million for transportation FY 19. He
remarked that Section C was fully funding the BSA for FY
20. He shared that Section D was fully funding
transportation for FY 20. He remarked that page 6, Section
7 was a standard lapse. He stated that Section 8 was
contingency, which referred to Section 6 that held the FY
20 appropriations for K-12 education and people
transportation. Those two sections would go into effect
upon the enactment of SB 26. He shared that Sections 9, 10,
and 11 were effective dates.
Co-Chair MacKinnon WITHDREW her OBJECTION. There being NO
further OBJECTION, the proposed committee substitute was
ADOPTED.
Co-Chair MacKinnon stated that Alaskans wanted assurance
that there was protection for the corpus of the permanent
fund. She asked for comments on the bill.
ANGELA RODELL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALASKA PERMANENT FUND
CORPORATION, stated that the CS being considered would
protect the corpus of the fund. She emphasized that the
corpus of the fund was protected constitutionally, and the
bill did not touch the corpus of the fund. She shared
observations that generated questions for the Alaska
Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC). She stressed that there
needed to be a statutory framework. She remarked that the
fund should not be placed in a political discussion, but
rather provide a working framework to plan each year
accordingly. She stated that work would be done with the
treasury to plan the draws over the course of year. She
encouraged the body to continue to work. She referenced the
contingency language.
Co-Chair Hoffman asked if it was fair to say that the
corporation was concerned about potential unstructured
draws that might compromise the earnings.
Ms. Rodell answered in the affirmative.
2:51:33 PM
MIKE BARNHILL, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
thought it seemed as though the salient provisions of the
bill were set out in Section 4, which called on the
department to use the CBR as a backstop to the general
fund. He stressed that there would be assistance to the
permanent fund in maximizing its investment revenue. He
stated that, presently, DOR worked internally to schedule
transfers from the CBR into the GF periodically throughout
the year. There was a model to predict when the daily
balance of the GF would go below $400 million, and that was
the moment to draw from the CBR. That model would be used
at the end of FY 18 to assist in providing a schedule to
the permanent fund appropriately to hopefully maximize
investment revenue.
2:53:39 PM
Co-Chair MacKinnon informed that she would be setting the
bill aside and taking it up again the following day and the
committee would be hearing public testimony.
Co-Chair MacKinnon handed the gavel to Co-Chair Hoffman.
2:54:10 PM
AT EASE
2:58:23 PM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair MacKinnon discussed forward-funding of education.
The house had provided a separate bill for funding
education. The bill was being considered separately at the
House's request.
HB 287 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 287 Resolution Kenai.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 Support Spangler.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 Sen FIN 2-23-2018.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 Letters of Support.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 Summary of Changes.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 Support Letter.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 SCSHB 287 work draft version R.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 286 Numbers and Language Spreadsheet Supporting Document A.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 286 |
| HB 286 Summary of Changes version N.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 286 |
| HB 287 Supporting Document A.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 286 SCSforCSHB work draft version N.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 286 |
| HB 285 SCSforCSHB 285 work draft version R.pdf |
SFIN 4/5/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 285 |