03/03/2014 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SJR15 | |
| Big Game Commercial Services Board | |
| Board of Fisheries | |
| Commissioner, Department of Natural Resources | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 287 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SJR 15 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE RESOURCES STANDING COMMITTEE
March 3, 2014
1:13 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Peggy Wilson, Vice Chair
Representative Mike Hawker
Representative Craig Johnson
Representative Kurt Olson
Representative Paul Seaton
Representative Scott Kawasaki
Representative Geran Tarr
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Eric Feige, Co-Chair
Representative Dan Saddler, Co-Chair
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 15
Opposing any international designation of Alaska land or water
as an international park, world heritage site, biosphere
reserve, Ramsar site, or other classification of land or water
that affects the use of land or water by the state or an Alaska
Native corporation without approval by the United States
Congress and the Alaska State Legislature; requesting the United
States Department of State and the United States Department of
the Interior to cease all further action related to an
international designation for land and water in the state until
the action is approved by the United States Congress and the
Alaska State Legislature; requesting that the United States
Congress pass legislation requiring Congressional approval of
any international designation that affects the use of land or
water by the state or the United States; requesting that the
governor be involved in the process and development of any joint
action plan; requesting that the state, including the
departments responsible for the management of fish and wildlife
and other natural resources, be an integral part of any
discussion, agreement, understanding, or other process that
affects the use or development of fish and wildlife and other
natural resources in the state; and urging the governor and the
attorney general to reserve all legal remedies for a taking of
the natural resources of the state by an international
designation of land and water in the state.
- MOVED HCS SJR 15(RES) OUT OF COMMITTEE
CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
Big Game Commercial Services Board
Michelle Metz
Gene Peltola
- CONFIRMATION(S) ADVANCED
Board Of Fisheries
Frederick "Fritz" Johnson
- CONFIRMATION(S) ADVANCED
Commissioner - Department Of Natural Resources
Joe Balash
- CONFIRMATION(S) ADVANCED
HOUSE BILL NO. 287
"An Act approving and ratifying the sale of royalty oil by the
State of Alaska to Tesoro Corporation and Tesoro Refining and
Marketing Company LLC; and providing for an effective date."
- SCHEDULED BUT NOT HEARD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: SJR 15
SHORT TITLE: OPPOSE INTERNATIONAL DESIGNATING OF LAND
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) GIESSEL
01/22/14 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/22/14 (S) RES
02/08/14 (S) RES AT 9:00 AM BUTROVICH 205
02/08/14 (S) Moved SJR 15 Out of Committee
02/08/14 (S) MINUTE(RES)
02/10/14 (S) RES RPT 5DP
02/10/14 (S) DP: GIESSEL, MICCICHE, BISHOP, DYSON,
FAIRCLOUGH
02/18/14 (S) TRANSMITTED TO (H)
02/18/14 (S) VERSION: SJR 15
02/19/14 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/19/14 (H) RES
03/03/14 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
JANE CONWAY, Staff
Senator Cathy Giessel
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: On behalf of the prime sponsor, Senator
Giessel, explained the changes in the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for SJR 15, Version N.
SENATOR CATHY GIESSEL
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as prime sponsor of SJR 15.
STAN LEAPHART, Executive Director
Citizens' Advisory Commission on Federal Areas (CACFA)
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SJR 15.
DEANTHA CROCKETT, Executive Director
Alaska Miners Association, Inc. (AMA)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SJR 15.
MARLEANNA HALL, Projects Coordinator
Resources Development Council (RDC)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SJR 15.
MICHELLE METZ, Appointee
Big Game Commercial Services Board (BGCSB)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as an appointee to the Big Game
Commercial Services Board.
GENE PELTOLA, Appointee
Big Game Commercial Services Board
Bethel, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as appointee to the Big Game
Commercial Services Board.
FREDERICK "FRITZ" JOHNSON, Appointee
Board of Fisheries
Dillingham, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as appointee to the Board of
Fisheries (BOF).
JOE BALASH, Commissioner Designee
Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as commissioner designee to the
Department of Natural Resources.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:13:37 PM
VICE CHAIR PEGGY WILSON called the House Resources Standing
Committee meeting to order at 1:13 p.m. Representatives Hawker,
Johnson, Olson, Seaton, and P. Wilson were present at the call
to order. Representatives Kawasaki and Tarr arrived as the
meeting was in progress.
SJR 15-OPPOSE INTERNATIONAL DESIGNATING OF LAND
1:14:12 PM
VICE CHAIR PEGGY WILSON announced that the first order of
business would be SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 15, Opposing any
international designation of Alaska land or water as an
international park, world heritage site, biosphere reserve,
Ramsar site, or other classification of land or water that
affects the use of land or water by the state or an Alaska
Native corporation without approval by the United States
Congress and the Alaska State Legislature; requesting the United
States Department of State and the United States Department of
the Interior to cease all further action related to an
international designation for land and water in the state until
the action is approved by the United States Congress and the
Alaska State Legislature; requesting that the United States
Congress pass legislation requiring Congressional approval of
any international designation that affects the use of land or
water by the state or the United States; requesting that the
governor be involved in the process and development of any joint
action plan; requesting that the state, including the
departments responsible for the management of fish and wildlife
and other natural resources, be an integral part of any
discussion, agreement, understanding, or other process that
affects the use or development of fish and wildlife and other
natural resources in the state; and urging the governor and the
attorney general to reserve all legal remedies for a taking of
the natural resources of the state by an international
designation of land and water in the state.
1:15:16 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER moved to adopt Version U as the working
document.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON objected for discussion purposes.
1:15:48 PM
JANE CONWAY, Staff, Senator Cathy Giessel, Alaska State
Legislature, stated the current version of the proposed
committee substitute (CS) for SJR 15 is Version N.
SENATOR CATHY GIESSEL, Alaska State Legislature, clarified that
the original version of SJR 15 was Version U.
1:16:16 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER withdrew his motion.
The committee took a brief at-ease.
1:17:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON moved to adopt the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for SJR 15, Version N, [labeled 28-LS1192/N,
Bullock, 2/28/14] as the working document.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON objected for discussion purposes.
1:17:49 PM
MS. CONWAY explained that Version N makes three small changes:
On page 2, line 26, changes "National Park Service" to "the
federal government"; on page 3, line 8, changes "would" to
"potentially could evolve into" and on page 4, line 6, changes
"would" to "could." In response to a question, stated that
these changes do not at all alter the message of SJR 15.
1:18:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON removed his objection. There being no
further objection, Version N was before the committee.
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON opened public testimony on SJR 15.
1:19:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON requested a brief overview of the
resolution for the public.
SENATOR GIESSEL stated that SJR 15 is similar to a resolution
that several committee members sponsored in 2007 that passed the
legislature. She noted this is not a new issue. She explained
that Beringia is a designated international park in Northwest
Alaska. She advised that this represents another taking of
Alaska land. She acknowledged the committee is familiar with
the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA).
The third element in ANILCA indicates that Alaska has given its
share of lands for federal conservation units. She related that
ANILCA also contains a "no more clause" noting that Alaska need
not give any more land. However, after ANILCA passed in 1985,
the National Park Service (NPS) began to capture land to create
the Bering Land Bridge National Preserve thereby taking more
land. In the early 1990s informal discussions between President
George Bush and President Gorbachev were held proposing an
international park designation that would consist of land from
Russia and land in Alaska. In 2013, Russia formally established
the Beringia National Park on the Chukotka Peninsula in Russia.
This would be joined with the Beringia Land Bridge National
Preserve on the Seward Peninsula and Cape Krusenstern National
Monument just north of Kotzebue. She summarized that this is
Russian land and Alaska's land creating an international park
designation.
1:22:05 PM
SENATOR GIESSEL noted that in October 2013 another Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) was developed and is now awaiting signature
of the president to finalize this international designation.
The purpose of the park would be to consider culture,
environment, and conduct research in the protected area. While
this may sound nice, Governor Parnell has not been a party to
these discussions, nor has the legislature, and Congress has not
been invited to discuss or chime in on this designation. This
designation falls under the United Nations Educational,
Scientific, and Cultural Organization. After Cape Krusenstern
National Monument and the Bering Land Bridge National Preserve
designations, further United Nations organizations' criteria
applied to other areas. For example, she pointed out that a
proposed road that would go through the Izembek [National
Wildlife Refuge], which is a Ramsar Convention [list of wetlands
of international importance] site, but it was declined due to
concern about grasses and birds. She reiterated that this has
been designated a Ramsar Convention site by the United Nations.
SENATOR GIESSEL related that Alaska World Heritage sites, also
designated by the United Nations include Glacier Bay and
Wrangell-St. Elias Park, as well as Denali National Park, which
is a biosphere reserve. She stated there is an "ongoing push"
for a buffer zone around Denali National Park and Preserve. She
stated that pushing for a buffer zone is one path taken to
expand the size of a preserve.
1:24:07 PM
SENATOR GIESSEL pointed out although these designations seem
harmless, similar ones have curtailed resource development
around the world. This resolution expresses her concern that
terms such as "sustainable development" that are commonly stated
by the United Nations and the federal government will mean
restricted development. She advised that the governor has sent
letters to [former] Secretary of State Hilary Clinton,
expressing his concern. U.S. Senator Murkowski and Congressman
Don Young have asked U.S. Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell
and Secretary of State John Kerry to stop and listen to the
State of Alaska on this issue. Similarly, the leadership in the
other body has written a similar letter and the Citizens'
Advisory Commission on Federal Areas (CACFA) has listed this
international park as a primary priority concern.
SENATOR GIESSEL stated that the purpose of SJR 15 is to raise an
awareness that this proposal has not gone away, but has moved
forward. She reported that an MOU signed by Russia and the
Secretary of State is awaiting President Obama's signature to
finalize the document.
1:25:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER pointed out the final resolve clause urges
the governor and the attorney general to seek legal remedies,
but they are not on the list of people who will receive copies
of this resolution. He suggested they should be added.
SENATOR GIESSEL agreed that is a good suggestion.
1:26:58 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI requested a specific example of how this
designation has hampered development of natural resources in
Alaska.
SENATOR GIESSEL deferred to her staff, Jane Conway.
MS. CONWAY answered that the most recent example is the Izembek
Road from Cold Bay to King Salmon. She remarked that this road
as a Ramsar site was touted as a reason for denial. This
decision cited the Black Headed Brant and the protection of the
eel grass in the area [as the basis for the denial.] The
purpose of this resolution is that it could possibly hamper
development in the state if the international designations are
allowed without Alaska's or Congressional approval.
1:28:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI asked for some of the benefits to Alaska
and Russia in having an MOU in place regarding the Beringia.
SENATOR GIESSEL said she cannot think of a single benefit of
having this MOU in place. It is an additional international
taking that has no benefit.
1:29:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR pointed out that the lands in question are
federal lands. She referred to a map in members' packets
entitled "Proposed Transboundary Area of Shared Beringian
Heritage" and to the proposed contributions to International
Protected Area - Pending Designation. She said these lands
appear to all be federal and native lands so it may be
appropriate for the federal government to have these
deliberations about federal lands. She asked whether any state
lands are included.
SENATOR GIESSEL answered yes; naming the Bering Land Bridge
National Preserve and the Cape Krusenstern National Monument
north of Kotzebue. She outlined the challenge, that the NPS web
site describes Beringia by latitude and longitude and
geographical location. Beringia actually extends to the top of
Alaska and to the Mackenzie River in Canada, to the bottom of
the Kamchatka Peninsula, about parallel to the Aleutian Islands.
This essentially would encompass the entire state. She noted
the significant oil and mining resources. The road from the Red
Dog Mine to tidewater had to cross Cape Krusenstern and required
an act of Congress to build the road. She expressed concern
that if this becomes internationally designated, Alaska would
have significant barriers to resource development.
1:32:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR understood the concern is related to the
larger designation.
SENATOR GIESSEL explained that these designations tend to expand
over time. This is U.S. land, so she did not understand the
reason to relinquish it to international jurisdiction.
1:33:33 PM
STAN LEAPHART, Executive Director, Citizens' Advisory Commission
on Federal Areas, testified in support of SJR 15 from the
following written statement [original punctuation provided]:
I appreciate the opportunity to testify today in
support of SJR 15.
The Commission shares the concerns expressed in SJR 15
regarding the designation of lands under various
internal initiatives such as that reflected in the
proposed memorandum of understanding between the
United States and the Russian Federation to
"symbolically link" U.S. National Parks in the Bering
Strait Region to form an international protected area.
The proposed MOU states that it is legally nonbinding
and is not an international agreement and does not
create any rights or obligations under international
law. Based on past experience, however, the terms of
this MOU could complicate the ability of the National
Park Service to manage national park lands in this
region. It could also potentially affect the ability
of the State of Alaska and the private land owners in
the region to develop and utilize their lands.
While somewhat different in scope, the recent decision
by the Secretary of the Interior to not approve the
construction of a road in the Izembek NWR was based in
no small part on the 1986 designation of the refuge as
a Wetland of International Importance under the Ramsar
Convention, even though the convention is non
regulatory and has no sanctions for violating treaty
commitments.
In the 1990s the designation of Glacier Bay National
Park & Preserve as both a United Nations World
Heritage Site and a biosphere Reserve was a factor in
the phased elimination of a 100 year old state-managed
commercial fishery in the park.
The Commission notes that the National Park Service
Shared Beringian Heritage Programs has funded numerous
projects over the last 12 years in the Bering Straits
region. These projects have collected useful
archeological, cultural, historical, natural resource
and environmental data. We also note that many of the
projects are undertaken not in the Alaskan park units
for which the National Park Service has statutory
management responsibility, but in the Russian
Federation.
Both the Cape Krusenstern National Monument and the
Bering Land Bridge National Preserve (which are the
two U.S. National Park units that would be
"symbolically linked" under this MOU) were created by
ANILCA to protect archeological sites and provide for
the study of the historic migration of peoples across
the Bering Straits, as well as to preserve natural and
cultural resources in these two areas. We believe
that the increasingly scarce funds used for the
administratively created Shared Beringian Heritage
Program could better be utilized to meet the National
Park Service's statutory responsibilities for these
two park units.
1:36:48 PM
MR. LEAPHART pointed out that ostensibly under the MOU the
management decisions would only directly affect the National
Park Units. He asked to read a short excerpt from a recently
released report, as follows [original punctuation provided]:
A recent report by the Science Committee of the
National Park System Advisory Board contains the
following statement: "Confronted with continuous and
dynamic change and the goal of preserving ecological
integrity, NPS management strategies must be expanded
to encompass a geographic scope beyond park boundaries
to larger landscapes and to consider longer time
horizons. Specific tactics include improving the
representation of unique ecosystem types within the
National Park System, prioritizing the protection of
habitats that may serve as climate refugia, ensuring
the maintenance of critical migration and dispersal
corridors, and strengthening the resilience of park
ecosystems."
MR. LEAPHART submitted that this language means the NPS looks
outside its management responsibilities to develop management
strategies and emphasizes the possible threat from creation of
this Beringian Heritage Area.
1:38:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR inquired whether SJR 15 would have an impact
on the MOU, which is what is moving forward and if the
resolution should specifically address the MOU.
MR. LEAPHART offered his belief that the intent of SJR 15 is in
opposition to the MOU and he would hope the result would be that
the president would not sign it.
1:40:02 PM
DEANTHA CROCKETT, Executive Director, Alaska Miners Association,
Inc. (AMA) spoke in favor of SJR 15. She read from the
following written statement [original punctuation provided]:
Good afternoon. My name is Deantha Crockett, and I am
Executive Director of the Alaska Miners Association.
AMA began in 1939 (so 2014 celebrates our 75th
Anniversary!) and is the umbrella association for
Alaska's mining industry. Our members include small,
family-run placer operations, to large-scale hard rock
mines, to coal mines, to exploration projects, and all
vendors and contractors that support Alaska's mines.
AMA does not support actions that decrease or prevent
access to Alaska's lands. In 1980, the Alaska National
Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) designated
millions of acres within Alaska as conservation system
units, and more importantly, issued a promise that "No
More" lands would be precluded from a multiple-use,
fully accessible classification. The Federal
government today should keep that promise, and block
no further acreage from access, exploration, and with
hope, development of all uses.
Separately, land designations should only be made with
full Congressional approval, the Alaska Legislature,
and the Governor, as well as the various private
landowners in this area. Governor Parnell, as well as
Senator Murkowski and Congressman Young have expressed
concerns that the federal government has not consulted
the State of Alaska on this land designation. While on
a technical note, designations don't create regulatory
authority over lands, it is a consideration taken into
account by land managers who evaluate activities on
those lands, and it is certainly noticed by potential
developers who may sense additional risk by such a
land designation when evaluating whether or not to
invest in Alaska.
We believe passage of SJR15 will send a message that
the State of Alaska takes the multiple-use standard
seriously, and that designations of lands within our
state must be done in consultation with our state
lawmakers.
Thank you for hearing this resolution and I encourage
you to pass it as soon as possible.
1:42:06 PM
MARLEANNA HALL, Projects Coordinator, Resources Development
Council (RDC), paraphrased, as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
The Resource Development Council for Alaska, Inc.
(RDC) is writing in support of SJR 15, a resolution
opposing any international designation of Alaska land
or water as an international park, world heritage
site, biosphere reserve, Ramsar site, or other
classification of land or water that affects the use
of land or water by the state or an Alaska Native
Corporation without approval by the U.S. Congress and
the Alaska State Legislature.
RDC is an Alaskan business association comprised of
individuals and companies from Alaska's oil and gas,
mining, forest products, tourism, and fisheries
industries. Our membership includes all of the Alaska
Native regional corporations, local communities,
organized labor, and industry support firms. RDC's
purpose is to expand the state's economic base through
the responsible development of our natural resources.
It is a policy of RDC to advocate for access to and
across lands in Alaska for resource and community
development. RDC is concerned that the proposed
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the creation of
the Beringia International Park (Beringia) will create
another level of bureaucracy inhibiting access to
areas in Alaska.
The area under consideration in this proposed MOU is
vast and surrounds many rural communities. The MOU
lacks consultation and coordination with local and
state government, as well as ignores possible impacts
to resources, such as oil and gas, and mining
exploration and development.
It is also a policy of RDC to advocate for multiple
use of lands, and resource development in the area
could provide economic benefits to the region where
well-paying jobs are scarce, as well as improved or
added infrastructure and access to areas for multiple-
users.
RDC maintains that multiple uses should include mining
(exploration, leasing, development) for oil and gas,
coal, and minerals, as well as recreational and other
potential uses. With less than one percent of Alaska
in conventional private ownership, access should be
available on other lands, and should not be restricted
by an unprecedented one-size fits all MOU that will
likely add another layer of federal bureaucracy.
SJR 15 is timely, given the MOU has yet to be signed
by the President. Input from those most knowledgeable
about Alaska and Alaska's resources should not be
ignored. This MOU could seriously jeopardize the
ability to access resources that fall in and around
Beringia. In addition, past federal government
promises assured access to allow resource development
in this area and others not set aside through the
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act
(ANILCA)
The passage of ANILCA in 1980 set aside 106 million
acres of federal lands in Alaska as conservation
system units. Today, Alaska accounts for 70 percent
of all national park lands in the United States, as
well as 53 percent of federally designated Wilderness
for all of the U.S.
RDC thanks Senator Giessel for introducing this
resolution, and urges the Alaska Legislature to pass
SJR 15 and to continue to assert the State of Alaska's
rights, and consult with the State of Alaska on this
and any future designations of the State's lands and
resources.
1:43:46 PM
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON, after first determining no one else wished
to testify, closed public testimony on SJR 15.
1:44:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI recalled that many members took the
megaprojects seminar several years ago and it was enlightening
to understand that part of the problem with resource development
is having prospective developers know the confines of the
development. Sometimes MOUs have a positive impact, he said.
He was unsure about this one in particular, but he does not
object to moving the resolution at this point.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON pointed out that the last further resolved
urges the attorney general to reserve all legal remedies, which
he said is an important part of SJR 15.
1:45:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER moved to adopt Conceptual Amendment 1, to
add "Governor Parnell and Attorney General Geraghty" to the
addressees of the resolution.
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON objected for discussion purposes.
1:45:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER said he wanted to ensure that even though
the resolution will pass the governor's desk for signature, it
doesn't mean it will be assimilated by the governor. He
respectfully asked for the sponsor's consent to make the
amendment to add Governor Parnell and Attorney General Geraghty
to the list of addressees.
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON said she noted the sponsor was nodding her
assent.
SENATOR GIESSEL agreed.
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON removed her objection. There being no
further objection, Conceptual Amendment 1 was adopted.
1:46:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON moved to report SJR 15, Version N, labeled
28-LS1192/N, Bullock, 2/28/14, as amended, out of committee with
individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal note.
There being no objection, the HCS SJR 15(RES) was reported from
the House Resources Standing Committee.
1:47:09 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 1:47 p.m. to 1:49 p.m.
^CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
^Big Game Commercial Services Board
Big Game Commercial Services Board
1:49:49 PM
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON announced that the next order of business
is confirmation hearings for the Big Game Commercial Services
Board (BGCSB), the Board of Fisheries, and Commissioner of the
Department of Natural Resources.
1:50:33 PM
MICHELLE METZ, Appointee, Big Game Commercial Services Board,
stated that she serves as a manager for the Sealaska Corporation
based out of Juneau. This will be her first reappointment to
this board. She recalled that she initially served a partial
term. She explained that a substantial amount of learning is
necessary. She said the former Chair of the BGCSB, Paul
Johnson, recommended to the governor that she serve on the
board. She occupies the seat as the large, private landowner.
The Sealaska Corporation has had guides operating on its land.
She expressed an interest in serving since guiding offers
employment opportunities in rural communities. Many rural
residents are familiar with the outdoors, hunting, and so it
seems to be a natural fit for them to assist guides.
1:52:39 PM
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON opened public testimony. After determining
no one wished to testify she closed public testimony on the
confirmation hearing for Ms. Metz.
1:53:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER moved to forward the name of Michelle Metz
as nominee to the Big Game Commercial Services Board to the
joint session of the House and Senate for consideration. There
being no objection, Ms. Metz's name was forwarded to a joint
session of the House and Senate for consideration.
The committee took a brief at-ease.
1:54:00 PM
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON related that the next confirmation hearing
would be for Gene Peltola, Appointee to the Big Game Commercial
Services Board.
1:54:40 PM
GENE PELTOLA, Appointee, Big Game Commercial Services Board,
stated that like Ms. Metz, this is a reappointment to the BGCSB.
He has served the remaining year of a three-year term and was
recommended to serve on the board by the current Chair. He just
retired after spending 25 years as the Chief Executive Officer
and President of the Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation. He has
always had an interest in natural resources, the state has been
good to him, and in his retirement, he would like to provide
services back to the State of Alaska.
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON opened public testimony. After determining
no one wished to testify she closed public testimony on the
confirmation hearing for Mr. Peltola.
1:55:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER moved to forward the name of Gene Peltola
as a nominee to the Big Game Commercial Services Board to the
joint session of the House and Senate for consideration. He
reminded members that signing the reports regarding appointments
to boards and commissions in no way reflects individual members'
approval or disapproval of the appointees, and that the
nominations are merely forwarded to the full legislature for
confirmation or rejection.
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON concurred. There being no objection, Mr.
Peltola's name was forwarded to a joint session of the House and
Senate for consideration.
^Board of Fisheries
Board of Fisheries
1:56:49 PM
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON announced that the next order of business
would be the confirmation hearing for Frederick "Fritz" Johnson
as appointee to the Board of Fisheries.
1:56:58 PM
FREDERICK "FRITZ" JOHNSON, Appointee, Board of Fisheries, stated
that Bristol Bay has been his home since 1979 when he started
fishing commercially, and Bristol Bay is fish country, like much
of Alaska. He has crewed or captained various boats in salmon,
herring, and halibut fisheries. He related that his first
winter job was working for the 1980 federal census and he
visited nearly every community in the region, from Pedro Bay to
the Chignik, and he got to know the people and the region.
Additionally, he spent a dozen years managing a weekly
newspaper, from 1980 to 1992, and through that process became
familiar with many issues important to residents of Southwest
Alaska. Between fishing seasons he has also worked for various
nonprofit organizations, but five years ago he signed on as the
regional fisheries coordinator for the Bristol Bay Economic
Development Corporation, which is a local community development
quota entity in Southwest Alaska. He characterized this job as
"all fish all the time." He said he is familiar with board
processes and procedures. He further said he is ready to make
the time and commitment for the Board of Fisheries mandate for
sustainability of Alaska's fisheries while providing
opportunities to the various user groups in the state.
1:58:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER offered his thanks and admirations to Mr.
Johnson, noting he has received many letters of support for the
nominee. He inquired whether he can fairly represent all user
groups beyond commercial fisheries, for example, if he could
also represent the sport fisheries perspective.
MR. JOHNSON replied he would not be applying for this
appointment if he felt he could not represent all the user
groups. He has also sport fished although his principal
background is in commercial fishing, but he understands the
Board of Fisheries must represent all user groups.
2:00:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR inquired whether any groups are opposing Mr.
Johnson's appointment to the Board of Fisheries.
MR. JOHNSON responded he is unaware of any opposition to his
appointment. He said he has participated in seven Board of
Fisheries' meetings thus far since October so he has discovered
it isn't always easy to make everyone happy.
2:01:16 PM
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON opened public testimony. After determining
no one wished to testify she closed public testimony on the
confirmation hearing for Mr. Johnson.
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER said that the absence of public testimony
"screams" volumes about Mr. Johnson's qualifications to serve on
this board.
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER moved to forward the name of Frederick
"Fritz" Johnson as a nominee to the Board of Fisheries to the
joint session of the House and Senate for consideration. He
reminded members that signing the reports regarding appointments
to boards and commissions in no way reflect individual members'
approval or disapproval of the appointees, and that the
nominations are merely forwarded to the full legislature for
confirmation or rejection. There being no objection, Mr.
Johnson's name was advanced to the joint session of the House
and Senate for consideration.
The committee took an at-ease from 2:02 p.m. to 2:04 p.m.
^Commissioner, Department of Natural Resources
Commissioner - Department of Natural Resources
2:04:44 PM
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON announced that the next order of business
would be the confirmation hearing for Joe Balash as appointee to
serve as commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources.
2:05:00 PM
JOE BALASH, Commissioner Designee, Department of Natural
Resources (DNR), stated that Alaska has been his home since
1986. His family moved to Alaska and his father was stationed
at Eielson Air Force Base. He indicated Alaska is where he
wants to make his home and have his own family. He began
working in the capitol 17 sessions ago and he has seen a number
of events come and go. He learned that DNR is the premier
agency in state government in terms of what makes this state
operate, what brings in the money, and what allows the state to
do all that is spectacular in Alaska. It's an honor and a
privilege for him to have the opportunity to lead DNR with the
responsibilities that come with the job.
2:06:52 PM
MR. BALASH said that Alaska has 100 million acres of upland, 60
million more acres in tidelands, and submerged lands. He
acknowledged it is a really big job. He pointed out that Alaska
has world-class resources and it requires world-class
management. He did not envision doing this job without the fine
employees that staff the agencies, numbering more than 1,100
employees. He offered his belief that these people manage the
resources on a day-to-day basis, while the commissioner
functions as an asset manager rather than a resource manager.
He further thought that the commissioner needs to look at ways
to leverage the resources and assets in Alaska to create
additional value and opportunities. He acknowledged many
employees follow the regulations and procedures and issue
permits on a daily basis; however, the commissioner must keep an
eye out for opportunities.
2:07:46 PM
MR. BALASH explained that Alaska has the largest park system in
the country, yet there is a backlog of deferred maintenance in
the parks that exceeds $50 million. The state's ability to
overcome that backlog is limited by all the same budget
challenges that the legislature must wrestle with. He suggested
an untapped opportunity exists in Alaska's parks. The
legislature has taken some steps to get started on an approach
that really could be the key, which is identifying private
concessions that can be leveraged to create revenue streams.
For example, in south Denali, the state has started to develop a
new alternative to provide visitor opportunities and partner
with the visitor industry in the form of a long-term concession
and agreement to create a revenue stream that could be "plowed"
back into parks. He envisioned that this wouldn't be limited to
the high-traveled high-density parks, but ones the families use
for picnics, barbeques, and weekend campouts, such as in Chugach
State Park. He said similar opportunities also exist in Wood-
Tikchik Park to make sure that nothing is inconsistent with park
values or management but to have a controlled planned and
orderly method for visitors to "see these treasures" and at the
same time create a revenue stream that can help sustain the park
system for all Alaskans.
2:10:21 PM
MR. BALASH, regarding oil and gas, noted that much time has been
spent discussing how to leverage the existing proven resource
base at Prudhoe Bay to create additional opportunities for years
to come by developing additional potential resources. He
pointed out a place in which the state got it wrong - in the
developments at Alpine and Badami, which were developed without
roads. The state missed out on extending its reach. The state
is limited in its exploration by the radius of ice roads that
can extend beyond the existing year-round infrastructure. Thus,
the state still has only the same radius as it had in 1989, yet
the state should be able to reach that much further east and
west. He said, "That's something that I think is a shame. It's
something that's probably cost us opportunities as a state in
the last 20 years." Those are the types of things he hoped to
avoid, he said.
2:12:01 PM
MR. BALASH, addressing public rumblings he has heard about his
[young] age and experience, said he didn't see this as a
problem. He stated that the reality is he is young enough that
he will see the consequences of the decisions the Commissioner
makes, which he views as an incredible responsibility.
2:12:52 PM
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON, with respect to his comments on ice roads
to Alpine and Badami fields, asked what expansion he envisioned
of additional roads and if he meant ice roads or other roads.
MR. BALASH answered that those fields were developed without
permanent roads. Had they been developed with permanent roads
additional reach with the ice roads would be further out than
today. In terms of development at Point Thomson, the field is
large enough to warrant development, but the state misses out on
smaller opportunities. He said that the "home runs" will take
care of themselves. The state needs to string together a few
"base hits."
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON concurred.
2:14:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER offered his appreciation for Mr. Balash's
passion, intelligence, and deep commitment. He remarked that he
has worked with Mr. Balash on challenging issues with many ups
and downs and questioned the appearance of Mr. Balash's
relationship with TransCanada as being extremely close. He said
he took note of TransCanada's lobbyist sitting in the audience,
with the vast majority of the other audience being staff. He
concluded that makes him want to know what TransCanada's
interest is in Mr. Balash's confirmation. He asked if appointed
whether Mr. Balash can be objective in his decisions and the
counsel he provides the governor in terms of dealings with
TransCanada or any other [oil and gas] company.
MR. BALASH responded that the counsel he has given to the
governor along the way will likely remain confidential.
However, the question raised is an important one. He described
his association with TransCanada as being purely through his
work at the state and advised that he has no personal financial
ties to TransCanada. He acknowledged the state's relationship
with TransCanada through the partnership wasn't perfect. In
fact, in some instances the state's relationship with
TransCanada has been questioned and reconsidered. He surmised
that will likely happen again in the future depending on the
legislature's actions. For example, the MOU will require
further agreement and further consideration. The specific
"gates" are big ones and the state must proceed with "our eyes
wide open."
2:17:47 PM
MR. BALASH acknowledged that TransCanada's performance has
impressed him to date; however, he believed TransCanada's
ability to help the state is limited. In fact, if the current
oil and gas discussion was limited to monetization of Prudhoe
Bay and Point Thomson, without any other concerns, the state
wouldn't need TransCanada as a financial partner. However, what
drives his interest in seeing TransCanada included has been
their ability to bring additional gas producers to the table to
move Alaska's resource through the infrastructure. He hoped he
has answered the question.
2:19:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER stated Mr. Balash has not answered his
question. He characterized Mr. Balash's response as a defense
of his relationship with TransCanada. He rephrased his
question. He asked if Mr. Balash is confirmed as commissioner
of DNR, whether he could be objective in his dealings with
TransCanada or any other individual commercial parties.
MR. BALASH agreed Representative Hawker is right. In response
to whether he can be objective, he offered his belief that one's
experiences with a company inform his/her decisions. He said
the challenge is to try to be objective. He asked what
objective measures could be used to evaluate any given proposal
or opportunity dealing with any company. He said the state has
an obligation to look for external benchmarks when considering
proposals whether to the governor or the legislature. The
question becomes how the state knows it is delivering value or
providing the right opportunities to move the state forward. He
went on to say he personally seeks this in all of the
department's transactions. He hoped the state would be
considering a royalty sale contract for oil soon and agreed the
state's deliberations must be objective. Further, objectivity
must come but not with blinders, and it must take into account
the experiences the state has had with the company to ensure
that the right features, terms, and conditions are met.
2:21:56 PM
MR. BALASH contrasted that with the settlement of Point Thomson
since litigation clouded the title of the gas. The state had to
identify benchmarks for the initial development of the field as
well as commitments for further development. Further, the state
needed to take into account the context and history of its
relationship with the operator. He concluded that this approach
will need to be taken with each particular case.
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON said she has a feeling that Representative
Hawker was seeking a "yes or no" response.
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER agreed that Mr. Balash has provided a
thorough answer. He maintained that he still has not received a
clear "yes or no" answer.
MR. BALASH answered, "I'm happy to do that. I can be objective.
I believe that I have been." He explained that the point he
wanted to make was that part of the decision-making process is
informed by our own experiences.
2:23:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON inquired whether at end of project life
the department should consider transferring any roads that were
built to the North Slope Borough or other municipal entity
rather than requiring dismantlement, removal, and restoration
(DR&R) in the leases.
MR. BALASH answered the department will consider the role
infrastructure has on the local government most impacted by oil
and gas activities. The DR&R specifically imbedded in leasees
requires the lessee to return the property to a condition
acceptable to the commissioner at the time of abandonment. He
suggested opportunities may exist to sever an easement and road
from the rest of the lease obligation. Certainly this could be
explored up front, he said. However, he pointed out practical
limitations may exist in order to preserve the obligation and
not absolve lessees from their obligation.
2:26:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON agreed that the state shouldn't absolve
the leases, but he asked whether the department will hold any
discussions with the "surface owners" to determine interest in
preserving the assets derived from production or if it is within
the commissioner's authority to make decisions and not impose
the DR&R even though it is part of the lease. He further
wondered if the lease should contain a provision to specifically
allow the commissioner to negotiate terms for surface facilities
acceptable to the municipality and the state.
MR. BALASH pointed out that in most instances on the North
Slope, the surface and subsurface owner is the state. Most of
the discussions he has held with the North Slope surround
whether to garner additional acres to fulfill the North Slope's
municipal entitlement. In fact, this has been and continues to
be a struggle, he said. In terms of split estate situations,
which occur most often on the Kenai Peninsula, it would vary
depending on the surface owner. Certainly from a municipal
standpoint, the opportunity to sort out how to pursue the DR&R
is something he hopes future commissioners will take into
account. His goal as commissioner would be to keep long-term
goals in mind in abandonment instances. He concluded, in many
cases, it would be beneficial to preserve pads and roads so long
as they are clean.
2:29:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI shared a camp anecdote from 1992 that
illustrated he has known Mr. Balash since they were children.
He then said that in 2006 and 2007, part of the Alaska Gasline
Inducement Act (AGIA) dealt with basin control and who owned the
basin. During AGIA and referring to the issue of access and the
issue of basin control, Mr. Balash's predecessor, Tom Irwin,
said, "If I were producer I might have the same trouble too, if
I wanted to control Alaska's gas basin." He asked him to
highlight his position and indicate whether it has changed.
MR. BALASH answered that he continues to have concerns around
basin control and seeks to find solutions, although he noted the
challenges are more difficult for oil than for gas, in part,
because the state is starting fresh on gas issues. In fact,
some terms in the Heads of Agreement were included due to prior
battles. However, he offered his belief that the oil and gas
companies want to avoid conflicts and desire solutions, too. He
viewed one challenge will be how to structure new development in
a truly efficient way. He characterized the amount of resources
in current fields and in the ground as "mindboggling."
Typically in Cook Inlet, big legacy assets have been
consolidated by Hilcorp [Energy Company]. Hilcorp has paid
attention to the "little bits" and has been "stringing them
together" to create an impressive "turnaround" in Cook Inlet
production. However, he was unsure this transition could occur
on the North Slope since the infrastructure is so big and
expensive. The challenge on the North Slope will be to attract
smaller operators to achieve what the bigger companies can't do
because they can't attract the investment within the corporation
to accomplish or are not interested for other reasons. He hoped
the state will be able to maintain a respectful and positive
dialogue with the incumbents since a good relationship will be
necessary.
2:35:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI asked how Mr. Balash would improve
relationships with the smaller independents in order to get more
oil in the pipeline.
MR. BALASH suggested the natural tendency is to over-generalize
by calling any company an independent that is not one of the
"big three" oil and gas producers: ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
(Conoco), BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. (BP), and ExxonMobil
Alaska Production, Inc. Often times problems arise when it is
perceived all companies will receive the same treatment.
However, in his experience, some companies have great ideas but
do not have financial ability to live up to their commitments in
terms of unit agreements and development plans. He contrasted
this with his observations from Repsol, which has fulfilled its
drilling obligations in units. He emphasized the DNR has been
working to rectify this situation with "non-incumbents" - a
label he prefers over "independents." He acknowledged the DNR
must work harder to assess whether a company is capable of
fulfilling its commitments. In response to a question, he said
Tom Kelly helped identify the state's selections on the North
Slope.
2:38:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI identified former Commissioner Kelly as
a DNR commissioner under former Governor Walter Hickel, who was
selected since he was an "oil man" the governor felt could work
with the industry. He provided some details on Mr. Kelly's
background to highlight the juncture he believes the state is at
in terms of natural gas development. He recalled Mr. Kelly
indicated that when dealing with the public resource, the
highest price is the fairest price since the state has the
fiduciary responsibility to maximize the state's value of its
resources. He asked Mr. Balash what that statement means to
him.
MR. BALASH responded that "the highest price is the fairest
price" is a pretty good rule to use. He identified one
challenge is to maximize the state's share by getting the
highest price for the state's royalty. He acknowledged some
Fairbanksans want reductions in the state's royalty share since
they believe it will result in reduced costs for heating oil,
gasoline, or that it will keep the [Flint Hills] refinery
operating. However, he agreed he must look beyond this narrow
constituency to fulfill his obligations as commissioner. He
agreed the challenge will be to get the highest price for the
resource the state owns and manages.
MR. BALASH highlighted the distinction between the derivation of
the share of the state's ownership - the royalty interest - and
the state's share of the production tax. He cautioned that the
state must be very careful when it assesses production taxes
since ultimately production taxes will affect the state's
royalty interest. Although the legislature has struggled with
this question in the past several years the state has worked
itself to "a pretty good spot all in all," he said.
2:42:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON asked for Mr. Balash's perspective on
public involvement and the public process in terms of state
assets ranging from agriculture leases to oil and gas leases.
He noted the state has experienced reductions in the public
process, whether it was coastal zone management or under HB 77.
MR. BALASH viewed the challenge in managing public lands as
striking the "sweet spot" between routine and unique processes.
For example, he viewed a difference between the public process
in long-term land disposal and short term situations that don't
have a lasting effect on the resource. Granted, transparency
when granting permits and authorizations is important, but the
state must also focus on today's tools and not on outdated
processes and systems. In fact, how the public can participate
changed dramatically over time and yet people still complain
that they didn't know a permit was being granted or that a
project was happening in their neighborhood. He favored a "more
is better" approach in terms of public involvement with land
disposal, but he believes the department can trust resource
managers to identify and apply the rules in a specific way on
routine matters. He remarked that some provisions in HB 77 may
actually require more public notice than the state presently has
for some key and routine authorizations.
2:46:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON asked what Commissioner Balash's
philosophy is on temporary water use permits being sequentially
offered. He wondered what the balance would be in terms of
issuing a water rights permit for the life of a long project as
compared to using temporary water permits to accomplish this
without public process.
MR. BALASH acknowledged this issue has received a lot of
interest but ultimately it might not be up to the commissioner
to decide. Additionally, other permits and review processes are
necessary for most projects, not just a water permit in order
for a project to move forward. Thus, he would advocate for more
involvement in terms of public noticing and comment in instances
in which other permits and review processes weren't being used.
Although providing the public access to a list of water use
permits in an area could happen, it shouldn't be necessary to
formally notice each water use permit in the newspaper or at
U.S. Post offices.
2:50:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON recalled that under the AGIA process,
ExxonMobil Corporation (Exxon) joined with TransCanada. Now,
Exxon and TransCanada operate, but Exxon, BP, and Conoco also
operate in the state. He asked him to comment on the
contractual relationships. He further asked whether he could
just declare AGIA non-economic and the state could pursue the
best partners. He further asked whether Exxon and TransCanada
make the best partners for the state.
MR. BALASH responded that the steps taken by Exxon in 2009 to
align with TransCanada in the AGIA framework were critical.
While ExxonMobil aligned closely with TransCanada, it did not
take on all the AGIA obligations or fully become part of the
license. Instead, Exxon aligned closely with the licensee in a
commercial relationship. That alignment provided an opportunity
and dialogue. The companies were prepared to acknowledged that
the state had certain key interests that were critical to the
state's long-term goals surrounding resource develop and
commercialization of Alaska North Slope (ANS) gas in particular.
He couldn't imagine arriving at this juncture or reaching the
Point Thomson settlement without that alignment having taken
place. He pointed out the history in 2007 and 2008, but in 2009
the dialogue occurred in how to advance the state's interests at
the same time recognizing the interests and key factors that
would affect decision-making on the part of one of the lessees,
in this case, the one that holds the largest interest in gas on
the North Slope.
2:54:54 PM
MR. BALASH, in terms of the current relationship between the
licensee and Exxon, stated that last year during the concept
selection agreements that exist between all parties, the
relationship broadened out to include BP and Conoco. He
characterized the AGIA license as a vehicle of convenience for
everyone, one that has helped keep everyone moving along in a
path that works for everyone. At the same time, the state has
been able to create a path forward that allows the state an
opportunity to step out of the license and move into a new
framework that fully recognizes everyone's interests moving
forward. He asked for further clarification on the contract
reference between Exxon and TransCanada.
2:55:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON clarified it would be the commercial
agreement where Exxon aligns itself with TransCanada. He
recalled TransCanada said that no one is happy unless Exxon is
happy. He asked whether Exxon is "double dipping" due to its
agreement with TransCanada.
MR. BALASH answered he is unaware of any side deals between
Exxon and TransCanada with respect to the equity interest that
is represented by the state's gas share in the Heads of
Agreement (HOA).
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON requested further clarification on the
commercial agreement Exxon has under AGIA.
MR. BALASH agreed. In further response to a question, he agreed
this is still the "law of the land."
2:56:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON suggested that somewhere the state is
partnered with Exxon and TransCanada in the state's 25 percent.
He was unsure of the percentages that Exxon and TransCanada have
discussed. He acknowledged the commissioner would not be aware
of the commercial agreement between TransCanada and Exxon.
Again, he asked whether the state is partnering with TransCanada
and Exxon and thereby giving up negotiation rights to them.
MR. BALASH answered that the partnership with Exxon, BP, and
Conoco to get to Alaska's 25 percent is embodied in the HOA. As
far as any parties the state partners with further on the 25
percent is a function of the agreement with TransCanada in the
body of the MOU. He said he is unaware of any further dilution
or interest that Exxon might have in or through TransCanada for
the midstream interests in the project.
2:58:25 PM
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON inquired whether it is possible given the
confidentiality of TransCanada and Exxon's agreements.
MR. BALASH answered that the agreement that aligned those two
parties in 2009 - the Interim Project Agreement - is one the
state did have access to review. Further, the Project Funding
Agreement was associated with it and that agreement specifically
was in place to identify how the parties would pay for their
respective shares of work under the license in order to fulfill
the license, even though the work was legally being conducted by
an entity that was not the licensee. However, TransCanada does
have an obligation to inform the state of any further agreements
between the parties and the state has not been informed of any
other agreement.
MR. BALASH explained that over time, as the concept agreements
were struck, and subsequently BP and Conoco were involved there
were some refinements made to the way reimbursements flowed;
however, that is something the state has monitored.
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON inquired whether DNR has actually asked the
questions.
MR. BALASH offered to call this evening.
3:00:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON asked whether two TransCanada's are in play
in Alaska.
MR. BALASH answered yes; that is correct in terms of which
corporate entity is playing specific roles.
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON inquired whether his previous comments
would apply to both TransCanada companies.
MR. BALASH asked for further clarification on whether he meant
the relationship between TransCanada and Exxon. He clarified
that in previous comments he was referring to TC Alaska, which
is the Alaska U.S. entity that is the licensee.
3:01:29 PM
VICE CHAIR P. WILSON opened public testimony. After determining
no one wished to testify she closed public testimony on the
confirmation hearing.
3:01:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER said he appreciates the latitude members
were given to ask questions. He remarked he could not help but
be concerned by the comment that called the AGIA license a
vehicle of convenience. He might suggest "an inconvenient
vehicle of questionable necessity."
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER moved to forward the name of Joe Balash as
commissioner designee for the Department of Natural Resources to
the joint session of the House and Senate for consideration. He
reminded members that signing the reports regarding appointments
to boards and commissions in no way reflect individual members'
approval or disapproval of the appointees, and that the
nominations are merely forwarded to the full legislature for
confirmation or rejection.
3:02:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked whether Commissioner Designee Balash
could be before the committee at the next hearing.
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER pointed out a motion is on the table.
3:03:37 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 3:03 p.m. to 3:05 p.m.
3:05:02 PM
There being no objection, Mr. Balash's name was advanced to the
joint session of the House and Senate for consideration.
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER remarked that he believes Mr. Balash is
willing to speak to Representative Tarr at any time.
3:06:02 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Resources Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 3:06 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SJR15 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Map.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Sponsor Statement HRES.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Support Letters.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 AK Heritage Site List.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 AK Land Ownership Map.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Biosphere List.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Governor Letter to US Secs of State.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 MOU US and Russia.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Murkowski - Young letter to Secs of State.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Murkowski Young response.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Promise of ANILCA.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Sen. Majority letter to Kerry & Jewell.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Version U.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Don Young Letter.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 NPS Letter.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Version N.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| SJR15 Changes Vsn U to N.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| Balash Bio & Photo.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Balash Resume.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Big Game - Metz #3.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Big Game - Peltola #3.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Fisheries - Johnson #3.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
|
| KPFA Letter - Johnson.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB 287 Briefing Paper and Sectional.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 DNR Fiscal Note.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 DNR Presentation.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 Tesoro Letter.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 Transmittal Letter.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 Version A.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| HB 287 Speaker Chenault Letter.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 287 |
| Johnson BOF Confirmation - ATA Letter.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Johnson BOF Confirmation - SEAFA Letter.doc.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Johnson BOF Confirmation - UFA Letter.pdf |
HRES 3/3/2014 1:00:00 PM |