Legislature(2013 - 2014)CAPITOL 120
02/11/2014 01:00 PM House MILITARY & VETERANS' AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB212 | |
| HJR21 | |
| HB286 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HJR 21 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 286 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 212 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 286-VETS' RETIREMENT/LOANS/HOUSING/EMPLOYMENT
1:50:00 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 286, "An Act relating to the Teachers'
Retirement System, the Judicial Retirement System, and the
Public Employees' Retirement System for qualified military
service; relating to the definition of 'veteran' for purposes of
housing, eligibility for veterans' loans, and preferences in
state employment hiring; and providing for an effective date."
1:50:34 PM
CURTIS THAYER, Commissioner, Department of Administration (DOA),
introduced HB 286 on behalf of the House Rules Committee by
request of the governor. Commissioner Thayer informed the
committee that the governor's administration has recently found
items in statute that are not current. For example, there are
over 64,000 veterans living in Alaska and 25,000 military
members and their families "call Alaska home." Under Alaska
law, veterans are eligible for special loan, housing, and
employment preferences; however, current statutory language
limits preferences to veterans of foreign wars up to and
including the Vietnam War. The state is currently unable to
extend these preferences to veterans of recent conflicts. In
recognition of our service men and women, the bill amends the
preference eligibility statutes by updating the periods of
service to include the veterans of the most recent wars and
conflicts and extending eligibility for veterans' preferences to
veterans of the 1991 Gulf War, and veterans who have served
under Operation Iraqi Freedom and includes provisions should
future conflicts arise. The bill also ensures military families
receive full survivor benefits for fallen soldiers implemented
under the Heroes Earning Assistance and Relief Tax Act (HEART
Act) enacted by Congress in 2008. The HEART Act also addresses
differential wage payments - compensation for service members
that they would have received from the employer during the
service member's period of active duty had the employee been
called up to active duty. Commissioner Thayer further explained
that when a state employee reservist is called to active duty
and is killed in action, their employment with the state will
revert back to the day before they died, thus they would receive
the same death benefit as a current state employee, and vesting,
if any, would be credited to them for their families. Also,
there is a provision for the definition of veteran for the
purposes of Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC). Attached
to HB 286 is a zero fiscal note. Commissioner Thayer observed
that the state has been very lucky that no reservists that have
been called for active duty have been killed; however, the
administration seeks to bring the state law up to date with
federal law.
1:54:07 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX opened public testimony on HB 286.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG surmised the bill extends private
benefits, but not governmental benefits.
COMMISSIONER THAYER responded that the bill extends state
benefits, such as state death benefits.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked why there is no fiscal note to
reflect that.
1:55:11 PM
KATHY LEA, Deputy Director, Central Office, Division of
Retirement and Benefits, Department of Administration, responded
that her division requested its plan actuary to value the effect
of the bill on the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS),
the Teachers' Retirement System (TRS), and the Judicial
Retirement System (JRS) [plan]. The actuary determined that
since there have been no such deaths since [2009], the bill has
a de minimis effect on the plan, thus there is a zero fiscal
note. In further response to Representative Gruenberg, she said
the state does not expect no one will be affected, but it does
not expect to see large numbers affected, that would influence
the liabilities of the plan.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG stated that he and especially the House
Special Committee on Military and Veteran's Affairs need to know
an estimate on how many would be affected.
COMMISSIONER THAYER pointed out, thankfully, in six years no one
has been killed under these circumstances. In further response
to Representative Gruenberg, he agreed that the bill is
prophylactic because the federal law changed in 2008, and the
state is currently out of compliance. He said, "This is for
audit purposes ... we're expecting a 2015 audit."
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG inquired as to whether the state will
face potential sanctions for being out of compliance.
MS. LEA said at this point her division does not anticipate any
sanctions from the federal government; if the bill passes as
anticipated, the state will be "in good qualification status" in
a timely manner. In further response to Representative
Gruenberg, she deferred the question of potential sanctions to
tax counsel, but added her understanding is that the division
will not face sanctions if the bill is passed prior to
qualification time.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG restated his question: "Any idea, if
we don't pass it, what we might face?"
2:00:03 PM
MS. LEA acknowledged that if the bill is not passed, when the
state seeks qualifications of PERS, TRS, and JRS, the most dire
consequence would be the loss of tax qualification status and,
at the least, the state could face fines.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG requested that the division forward to
him any further information on this matter.
REPRESENTATIVE HUGHES asked for confirmation that the definition
of "employer" referred to in the bill is the State of Alaska.
COMMISSIONER THAYER said correct. The bill applies to State of
Alaska employees, retirees, and political subdivisions.
2:02:10 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX, after ascertaining that no members of the
public wished to testify, closed public testimony.
2:02:35 PM
HB 286 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HJR 021 Hearing Request.doc |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 21 |
| HJR 021 Sponsor Statement.doc |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 21 |
| HJR 021 Supporting Documents-Article FOX BUSINESS NEWS.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 21 |
| HJR 021 Supporting Documents-Article MILITARY TIMES.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 21 |
| HJR 021 ver U.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 21 |
| 1.28.14 Chenault Transmittal Letter - Veterans.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 286 |
| HB 286 - VeteransBill_Sectional.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 286 |
| HB 286 - Hearing Request.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 286 |
| HB286-VeteransBill_TalkingPointsExt.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 286 |
| HB286-DCCED-DED-01-17-14.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 286 |
| HB286-DOA-DOP-01-20-14.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 286 |
| HB286-DOA-DRB-01-20-14.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 286 |
| HB286-DOR-AHFC-1-21-14.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 286 |
| HB0286A.PDF |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 286 |
| fiscalNote.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 Sectional.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 Supporting Document _ Cathy Randolph_ Jan. 27th 2014.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 Supporting Document _ Kim Nahom_ Jan. 27th 2014.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 Supporting Document _ Tanya Kelly_ Feb. 4th 2014.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 Supporting Document _Shannon and Dave Sieve_ Jan. 31st 2014.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 212 |
| HB0212A.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 212 |
| HB212 list of states.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 212 |
| MSRRA 2-4-2014--signed.pdf |
HMLV 2/11/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 212 |