Legislature(2003 - 2004)
03/08/2004 01:33 PM Senate HES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 282-UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE RESEARCH CONTRACTS
REPRESENTATIVE HUGH FATE, the bill sponsor, testified that HB
282 allows the president of the university to contract with an
employee of the university for intellectual property specific to
the research done by that employee. This contractual
arrangement benefits not only the university, but also the state
because of the potential for accrued proceeds from these
business relationships through profit and royalties. This takes
pressure off of recruitment and helps to retain top professors;
it supplements their incomes, but also supplements the income,
regard, and prestige of the university for which they work. The
bill has been held up before because of regulations concerning
ethics, as it's not allowed under current statute and
regulation. Many universities have done this. For example,
there were over 500 patents from Stanford alone, this past year.
This also takes pressure off of the general fund in the event
that business enterprises are wildly successful.
SENATOR LYDA GREEN expressed concern. She referred to the third
paragraph of President Mark Hamilton's letter of support and
read as follows: "Such constraints tend to force researchers to
choose between exporting their intellectual property without
continuing support, and giving up their university employment.
This climate provides little incentive for researchers to focus
on technologies that are subject to commercialization." She
said it seems simple that during an employee's tenure as a
professor or researcher - whether through grant, federal, or
state funding - that the information gained would certainly be
the university's property as well. She remarked that the issue
is that an employee can leave with that intellectual property
without the university accruing anything. "I have an idea that
problem is bigger than we are, and that's probably a subject of
debate all across universities in the world." She pointed out
that in the private market this would never be allowed.
REPRESENTATIVE FATE said he couldn't specifically answer that
concern, but those items would probably be taken up in the
contracts and agreements. "In our particular case because we
have not done much of this, it would be uncertain in my mind."
SENATOR GREEN responded that this was a very important issue to
be taking up, emphasizing that the protection of that
information and the benefit accruing to the university - if it's
done in the university lab, on computers, with help, with the
whole thing that goes with it - was her main concern.
CHAIR DYSON asked if contrary or negative testimony had been
heard on this bill.
MR. JIM POUND, Staff to Representative Fate, responded that
negative comments had not been offered in the other body's
committee process.
SENATOR GARY WILKEN moved to report HB 282 from committee with
individual recommendations [and zero fiscal notes, as mentioned
by the Chair].
CHAIR DYSON asked if there was any objection. Seeing and
hearing none, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|