Legislature(2013 - 2014)BUTROVICH 205
04/14/2014 01:30 PM Senate HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB134 | |
| HB361 | |
| HB281 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 134 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 281 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 361 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 281-PRESCRIPTION WITHOUT PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
2:05:19 PM
CHAIR STEVENS announced the consideration of HB 281. [CSHB
281(L&C) was before the committee.] He said it was the first
hearing on the bill. The intent is to have the sponsor introduce
the bill, take public testimony, and look to the will of the
committee.
2:05:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN GATTIS, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau,
Alaska, sponsor of HB 281. She said HB 281 is the companion bill
to SB 80 and is, essentially, Section 2 of that bill. She noted
that she has provided a comparison table of HB 281 and SB 80.
She related that HB 281 clarifies in statue that physicians may
not be sanctioned for dispensing or administering prescription
medications without a physical examination of the patient. This
practice is called telemedicine.
She explained that telemedicine-based medical care would be
delivered by primary care physicians located in Alaska. Anyone
needing medical care would be a candidate for this system. She
gave examples of who might benefit and be able to attain over-
the-phone or online consultations where physicians can diagnose
an ailment and, if necessary, provide a prescription. This bill
stipulates that physicians would not be able to prescribe
controlled substances.
She listed the benefits of telemedicine: convenience for the
patient, affordability, rapid access, higher productivity from a
healthy workforce, and primary care access for rural residents.
The efficient quality comes down to cost and access. She pointed
out that telemedicine does not replace the relationship with a
primary care provider. By requesting a consultation and filling
out an intake form, consent and medical history forms, a person
is entering into a doctor/patient relationship. If a patient
does not have a primary care provider, they may designate a
telemedicine provider as such. Patient privacy, the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability act (HIPA), and privacy
laws apply to telemedicine.
She noted that telemedicine already exists and is working in
Alaska. Alaska has been one of the pioneers of telemedicine. The
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, the Veterans
Administration, and the military, use telemedicine. Outside of
the state, major employees like Home Depot and Costco use
telemedicine.
She gave examples of medical conditions of people who seek
telemedicine: acute respiratory illness, uterine track
infections, skin problems, abdominal pain, and back and joint
problems. She said 20 percent of Alaska's population lives in
rural areas and needs quick and economical medical care.
2:09:56 PM
CHAIR STEDMAN noted that the committee is familiar with the
concept of telemedicine.
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS said the bill has not been heard in the
Senate Health and Social Services Committee. She emphasized that
there is a difference between the two bills. She explained that
HB 281 requires physicians to be located in Alaska. Another
difference is SB 80 required that physicians bill insurance
companies, a provision not included in HB 281.
CHAIR STEDMAN noted one zero fiscal note from Department of
Commerce, Community and Economic Development (DCCED).
2:11:56 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE asked why out-of-state doctors cannot be used.
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS replied that the bill has gone through
various House committees and Alaska doctors said they wanted to
protect Alaskan doctors.
SENATOR MICCICHE reported that currently there are several
thousand people using doctors who would no longer be allowed to
use them.
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS said the Native Health Consortium has a
federal exemption that allows them to go out of state for
telemedicine.
SENATOR MICCICHE said several companies also use out-of-state
physicians.
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS deferred to Dr. DePhillips to discuss
Costco and Home Depot.
SENATOR MICCICHE said they were not the only companies.
2:13:56 PM
DR. HENRY DEPHILLIPS, Corporate Chief Medical Officer, Teladoc,
Nashville, Tennessee, answered questions related to HB 281. Dr.
DePhillips responded to Senator Micciche's question by
explaining that there a three large telemedicine companies and
two of those three have put together a national network of
physicians. He said Teladoc has several Alaska physicians. He
noted Teladoc has a difference in interpretation of the Alaska
Medical Board rules than the Board does, which is what prompted
the bill. He said Teladoc has been operating in Alaska for a
while under the "cross coverage exemption." He said Teladoc and
other companies are looking for regulatory coverage through the
bill, which would include Alaska licensed and resident
physicians. He reported that Teladoc worked closely with the
Alaska Medical Association and agreed that the care of Alaskans
should be rendered by Alaska physicians.
2:15:52 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE asked why telemedicine is limited to
physicians, especially in rural areas.
DR. DEPHILLIPS said nurse practitioners, physician assistants
and others, are not included because Teladoc made a conscious
business decision to keep the standard of patient care very
high. He said they knew they would be a target and they have
been a target over the last 12 years. Toledo's model is a
physician-only model, as are the other two companies. Another
reason is because the Medical Board censured physicians doing
telemedicine, which is the reason behind the need for the
legislation. He thought lower level providers were regulated by
a different board.
SENATOR MICCICHE inquired about dispensing controlled substances
via telemedicine. He brought up a concern regarding post-op care
medications.
DR. DEPHILLIPS said that is a topic that has been discussed with
the Department of Corrections and others during the evolution of
the bill. He stated it is a balancing act. The concern was with
past history of internet prescribing controlled substances. He
said it was Toledo's decision not to allow DEA controlled
substances. He believed the other two companies also have that
policy. It keeps the abuse issue at bay and makes the Medical
Boards happy. He noted the Department of Corrections allows DEA
controlled substances to be prescribed via telemedicine because
there is a clinically trained person on site. The bill provides
for that exception.
2:19:38 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE used an example of a post-op patient in rural
Alaska who requires medication back in the village. He asked if
there is a way for controlled substances to be prescribed.
DR. DEPHILLIPS said there is currently not a way for controlled
substances to be prescribed using telemedicine. He observed that
if someone post-op in a village requires pain control requiring
a controlled substance, they would also need an in-person
assessment. He concluded that there is currently not a vehicle
to dispense a controlled substance.
2:21:30 PM
JENNIFER MEYHOFF, Alaska Association of Health Underwriters,
Anchorage, Alaska, testified in support of HB 281. She opined
that telemedicine has the potential to help contain high health
care costs.
SARA CHAMBERS, Director, Division of Corporation, Business, and
Professional Licensing, Department of Commerce, Community and
Economic Development (DCCED), Juneau, Alaska, answered questions
related to HB 281.
CHAIR STEDMAN asked if the department has any concerns about the
bill.
MS. CHAMBER said the department does not have concerns. She said
she believes the State Medical Board has gone on record with
their concerns.
CHAIR STEDMAN closed public testimony.
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS concluded that HB 281 is not a catch-all
and not a hospital, but brings Alaska into the 21st Century and
will provide access to low-level health care. She shared a story
about her experience with telemedicine.
2:25:20 PM
At ease
2:28:03 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE moved to report CS for HB 281 from committee
with individual recommendations and attached zero fiscal note.
CHAIR STEDMAN announced that without objection, CSHB 281(L&C) is
reported from the Senate Health and Social Services Standing
Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 361 Version A.pdf |
SHSS 4/14/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 361 |
| HB 361 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SHSS 4/14/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 361 |
| HB 361 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SHSS 4/14/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 361 |
| HB 361 cost benefit estimates.pdf |
SHSS 4/14/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 361 |
| HB0361-1-2-031914-DHS-Y.pdf |
SHSS 4/14/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 361 |
| HB0361-2-2-031914-CED-Y.pdf |
SHSS 4/14/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 361 |
| HB 361 - Connecticut cost comparison.pdf |
SHSS 4/14/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 361 |
| HB 361 - CCEIBISEChildrenAutism4.pdf |
SHSS 4/14/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 361 |