Legislature(2009 - 2010)BARNES 124
02/15/2010 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB315 | |
| HB280 | |
| HB238 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 315 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 280 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 238 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 280-NATURAL GAS
3:39:35 PM
CHAIR OLSON announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 280, "An Act relating to natural gas; relating to
a gas storage facility; relating to the Regulatory Commission of
Alaska; relating to the participation by the attorney general in
a matter involving the approval of a rate or a gas supply
contract; relating to an income tax credit for a gas storage
facility; relating to oil and gas production tax credits;
relating to the powers and duties of the Alaska Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission; relating to production tax credits for
certain losses and expenditures, including exploration
expenditures; relating to the powers and duties of the director
of the division of lands and to lease fees for the storage of
gas on state land; and providing for an effective date."
3:40:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE HAWKER, Alaska State Legislature, explained
that this is the second hearing in this committee. He related
that HB 280 was introduced at the request of the RCA to provide
clarity and determine whether the legislature intends the RCA to
have regulatory authority over gas storage facilities. Some
technical changes are necessary to "clean up" the bill,
incorporated in an amendment labeled 26-LS1185\S.2, Bullock,
2/13/10.
3:41:06 PM
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN made a motion to adopt Amendment 1,
labeled 26-LS1185\S.2, Bullock, 2/13/10, which read:
Page 2, line 10:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 2, line 13:
Delete "feet of gas each"
Insert "cubic feet of gas a"
Page 2, line 17:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 2, line 18:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 2, line 20:
Delete "operations ceased"
Insert "the gas storage facility ceases
commercial operation"
Page 2, line 25:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 2, line 26:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 2, line 30, through page 3, line 6:
Delete all material and insert:
"(4) "gas storage facility" means a tank,
depleted or nearly depleted reservoir or pool, or
other structure in the state that is available for the
storage of gas;"
Page 3, following line 10:
Insert a new paragraph to read:
"(7) "pool" has the meaning given in
AS 31.05.170;"
Renumber the following paragraph accordingly.
Page 6, line 6:
Delete "with certificates issued under
AS 31.05.032"
Insert "that qualifies for a tax credit under
AS 43.20.046"
Page 6, line 9:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 6, line 10:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 6, line 12:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 6, line 18:
Delete "AS 38.05"
Insert "this chapter"
Page 6, line 25:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 6, line 26:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 6, line 29, following "a":
Insert "rate or a"
Page 7, line 1:
Delete "from"
Insert "of"
Page 7, following line 19:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 7. AS 42.05.990(4) is amended to read:
(4) "public utility" or "utility" includes
every corporation whether public, cooperative, or
otherwise, company, individual, or association of
individuals, their lessees, trustees, or receivers
appointed by a court, that owns, operates, manages, or
controls any plant, pipeline, or system for
(A) furnishing, by generation,
transmission, or distribution, electrical service to
the public for compensation;
(B) furnishing telecommunications service
to the public for compensation;
(C) furnishing water, steam, or sewer
service to the public for compensation;
(D) furnishing by transmission or
distribution of natural or manufactured gas to the
public for compensation;
(E) furnishing for distribution or by
distribution petroleum or petroleum products to the
public for compensation when the consumer has no
alternative in the choice of supplier of a comparable
product and service at an equal or lesser price;
(F) furnishing collection and disposal
service of garbage, refuse, trash, or other waste
material to the public for compensation;
(G) furnishing injection, storage, and
withdrawal services for natural gas that is owned by a
utility regulated under this chapter;"
Page 8, line 3:
Following "facility":
Insert "described in (b) of this section"
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 8, lines 5 - 6:
Delete "beginning after the date the gas storage
facility commences commercial operations"
Insert "in which the gas storage facility
commences commercial operation or the tax year
immediately following"
Page 8, following line 12:
Insert a new subsection to read:
"(b) A gas storage facility qualifying for the
credit in this section must
(1) have a working gas storage capacity of
more than 500,000,000 cubic feet of gas other than
cushion gas;
(2) have a minimum withdrawal capability of
10,000,000 cubic feet a day as certified by the Alaska
Oil and Gas Conservation Commission under
AS 31.05.032;
(3) be available for the storage of gas
that is owned by a utility regulated under AS 42.05;
and
(4) if located on state land and leased or
subject to a lease under AS 38.05.180, be in
compliance with the terms of the lease."
Reletter the following subsections accordingly.
Page 8, line 16, following "capacity":
Insert "and withdrawal capability"
Page 8, line 17:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 8, line 19:
Delete "form"
Insert "application"
Page 8, line 21:
Delete "shall submit the form"
Insert "under (d) of this section shall submit
the application"
Page 8, line 23:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 9, line 12:
Delete "determined"
Insert "the capacity certified"
Page 9, line 18:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 9, line 22:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 9, line 23:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 10, line 5:
Delete "(g) and (h)"
Insert "(h) and (i)"
Page 10, line 13:
Delete "operations within 10 calendar years after
the"
Insert "operation within nine calendar years
immediately following the calendar"
Page 10, line 14:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 10, line 16:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Page 10, line 18:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
Delete "April"
Insert "May"
Page 10, line 19:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation. The notice required in this
subsection is considered a return for purposes of
AS 43.05.260"
Page 10, line 20:
Delete "operations,""
Insert "operation," "commences commercial
operation,""
Page 10, line 26:
Delete "an expenditure or action taken"
Insert "a lease expenditure incurred"
Page 11, line 19:
Delete "AS 38.05.032"
Insert "AS 31.05.032"
Page 11, lines 29 - 30:
Delete "for activity"
Insert "incurred"
Page 12, line 1:
Delete "for activity"
Insert "incurred"
Page 13, line 18:
Delete "expenditure"
Insert "lease expenditure incurred after
December 31, 2010"
Page 13, line 19, following "well":
Insert "lease"
Page 13, line 23, following "well":
Insert "lease"
Page 13, line 27, following "well":
Insert "lease"
Page 14, line 3:
Delete "an expenditure"
Insert "a lease expenditure incurred"
Page 14, line 5, following "well":
Insert "lease"
Page 14, line 15, following "of":
Delete "the"
Insert "a [THE]"
Page 14, line 16:
Delete "AS 43.20.046 or"
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES objected for purpose of discussion.
3:41:31 PM
LARRY PERSILY, Staff, Representative Mike Hawker, Alaska State
Legislature, referred to Amendment 2, which he characterized as
an 8-page amendment that contains "clean up" language and one
substantive issue. He referred to Section 7, to page 3, lines
23 - 31, and page 4, lines 1 - 12, of Amendment 1. In response
to a request by the RCA, who could not determine whether gas
regulation falls under its jurisdiction, this language would
amend the definition of utilities that are subject to RCA
regulation. Thus, if an entity is furnishing storage services
for natural gas that is owned by a utility regulated by the RCA,
the storage service would fall under RCA jurisdiction.
3:42:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN asked for clarification of whether
Amendment 1 would allow rates to utilities to fall under the
RCA.
MR. PERSILY answered yes. He related that the RCA would treat
the natural gas storage like any other utility. The storage
operator would have to present the cost and information, and
obtain approval for the cost of service from the RCA.
3:43:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH asked for further clarification. He asked
whether all gas coming into the gas storage facility would be
from a utility. He asked whether the source of natural gas
would be private sector gas and if the RCA would cover other
gas.
MR. PERSILY answered that if the storage operator is providing
storage service for gas owned by a utility, the storage
operation would be regulated. The fact that the utility may
also have other gas owned by someone else, such as a speculator,
someone marketing gas, or a producer, will not matter. Any
natural gas in a facility owned by a utility is subject to RCA
jurisdiction. In further response to Representative Buch, Mr.
Persily explained that the storage is subject to regulation by
the RCA, not necessarily the natural gas. The RCA is not
involved in setting the rates for natural gas, but would
consider the natural gas being stored. The natural gas being
stored could be owned by a utility or someone attempting to gain
access to the gas marketing business.
3:45:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES related that Amendment 1 amends the
definition section. She said basically any entity furnishing
injection, storage, and withdrawal services for natural gas that
is owned by a utility would be regulated under this chapter.
She said it seems somewhat circular since it defines "utility"
as anyone doing something owned by a utility.
MR. PERSILY answered that the natural gas is owned by a utility,
but the utility would not own the storage operation. For
example, some producers have their own storage but they do not
make it available to third parties, but operate the storage for
their own needs, which is not subject to regulation. The
natural gas being placed into storage is not owned by a utility,
although it may later be sold to a utility. This bill would
apply to storage operations that provide services to regulated
utilities.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES described a scenario in which a non-
utility built a storage facility, whether it could store gas
without being regulated so long as the natural gas is owned by
them.
MR. PERSILY answered that she is correct. He stated that if a
non-regulated producer builds a storage operation and stores its
own natural gas, and does not store gas owned by a utility, that
gas would not be considered as a regulated storage operation.
3:47:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES related a scenario in which gas is owned
by producer, and then sells the gas to a utility, the gas in
question being sold would not be covered by this definition.
MR. PERSILY agreed. The intent of Amendment 1 is to regulate
storage services which are purchased by regulated utilities.
Just as gas supply contracts are currently subject to the RCA,
these gas supply contracts will eventually come before the RCA.
3:47:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN understood at the point the non-native gas
is removed from the storage facility for distribution the gas
would fall under authority of the RCA. He further understood
that the costs for storage would not be passed on as excessive
costs to the customer as a regressive tax.
MR. PERSILY agreed.
3:48:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES asked whether the RCA has reviewed
Amendment 1.
CHAIR OLSON answered that the RCA would be testifying.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES removed her objection.
There being no objection, Amendment 1 was adopted.
3:49:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN made a motion to adopt the next amendment,
which was referred to as Amendment 3, which read [original
punctuation provided]:
Page 2, line 22:
Delete "operations"
Insert "operation"
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES objected for the purpose of discussion.
MR. PERSILY explained that Amendment 3 is a technical amendment
to fix one instance which was previously missed. Thus,
"operations" is changed to "operation".
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES removed her objection.
There being no objection, Amendment 3 was adopted.
3:50:54 PM
CHAIR OLSON asked whether the AOGCC will be able to comply with
the provisions in HB 280.
CATHY FOERSTER, Commissioner, Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation
Commission (AOGCC), Department of Administration, answered yes.
She added that the AOGCC will not have a fiscal note associated
with the bill.
CHAIR OLSON asked whether the process will work.
MS. FOERSTER responded that with respect to the AOGCC, the
process will work and is consistent with the commission's work.
CHAIR OLSON asked whether she thought offshore reservoirs in
Cook Inlet could be used for storage.
MS. FOERSTER suggested that if an operator follows the AOGCC's
regulations for gas storage, it does not matter whether the
facility is offshore or onshore. The AOGCC insures that when an
operator operates a storage reservoir, it is accomplished to
maintain and protect the integrity of the reservoir. This means
the operator must ensure the mechanical integrity of every well
that penetrates the reservoir. She related an incident that
happened in Hutchison, Kansas, in which a storage reservoir at
the Yaggy field, located approximately 5 miles outside of town
caused problems in the town of about 50,000 people. The gas
storage approval process did not take into account the complex
geology of the reservoir until several buildings in the town
exploded. Since then an operator must prove the gas reservoir
has integrity and acts as a closed system, every well has
mechanical integrity, and the gas will not seep into unexpected
places. If an operator met the AOGCC's requirements for gas
storage, the facility would be safe on shore or offshore. She
related that the cost or logistics of the reservoir falls
outside of the AOGCC's jurisdiction.
3:54:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CHENAULT asked whether the AOGCC is the
controller when gas is reinjected into a reservoir. He related
a scenario in which a storage facility is located in an area in
which a private party owns the mineral rights. He offered that
the party may have an expectation for compensation on gas when
it is injected and again when it is removed from the reservoir.
MS. FOERSTER explained that the AOGCC would play a role in
protecting correlative rights. The operator would need to
demonstrate ownership or approval of all owners in the acreage.
3:55:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN remarked that the AOGCC would ensure the
gas fields do not leak.
MS. FOERSTER agreed.
3:56:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES recalled prior testimony that AOGCC
foresees no problems in complying with the terms of the bill.
She asked whether the AOGCC is "already signing off."
MS. FOERSTER offered a scenario in which an operator indicates
it wants to inject gas into a reservoir. The operator must
inform the AOGCC of the anticipated maximum pressure it will
subject the reservoir, provide geological information of the
reservoir boundaries, and prove that every penetration of the
reservoir has sufficient mechanical integrity to withstand the
anticipated pressures. The AOGCC checks the data, and using the
beginning and ending pressure, as well as a good production
history or physical description of the reservoir, the AOGCC can
obtain a good estimate of the amount of gas will be stored. She
stated this is something the AOGCC already performs and their
estimates are very close.
3:59:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES asked whether the requirements in HB 280
are acceptable.
MS. FOERSTER suggested that the AOGCC may need to tweak the
regulations to require operators to provide more information,
similar to the process the AOGCC uses as technology changes.
3:59:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES asked for the gas or reservoir capacity in
the Cook Inlet that is in use, authorized, or pending.
MS. FOERSTER explained that the AOGCC has three physical areas
of approval. She recalled that five or six storage injection
orders have been approved, but these orders encompass three
basic geographical areas. Additionally, two more applications
for storage injections have been received. She detailed that
two of the three areas with approved storage include the Kenai
and Sterling, with 6 billion cubic feet (Bcf). However, given
that the start and end pressure entails only 100 pounds
increment, which is a tiny increment, the reservoir could store
up to 25 Bcf of gas. Thus, every 100 pounds per square inch
(psi) of pressure would yield approximately 25 more Bcf of gas.
She related that at some point the wells would not have
mechanical integrity and the AOGCC would not allow the producer
to go above that amount, noting the AOGCC has not been asked to
do so. The Kenai and Sterling Area comprise 25 Bcf of gas
storage. The Pretty Creek gas storage facility has two
intervals using that same method of determining volume have a
storage capacity composite of 2.5 Bcf. Swanson River has three
reservoirs intervals have a composite of 5.3 Bcf of storage
capacity. The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) may show a
lower capacity based on the operator's intent, but for
authorized pressures the operator has more ability. She noted
that Aurora Gas, LLC, has applied for storage injection order at
Nicolai Creek for another 0.8 Bcf, and another operator has
applied for 3 Bcf at Ivan River, for a total of 36 to 37 Bcf of
gas storage capacity that is approved or in the approval
process.
4:02:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES asked how much gas is being used for
storage at the current time.
MS. FOERSTER related her understanding that a small volume is
being stored, but not near the full capacity.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES expressed interest in the reason gas is
not being stored if the producer has the capacity to do so.
MS. FOERSTER suggested this question is better answered by the
operator.
4:03:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN related his interest in knowing the
mechanics of a scenario in which a development plan was
proposed, but was disapproved by the department. He offered to
pass on the question for now.
4:04:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH understood an agent or producer has been
storing and shipping Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). He inquired
as to whether this is under the AOGCC's purview.
MS. FOERSTER answered that the AOGCC's authority stops at the
wellhead.
REPRESENTATIVE CHENAULT, in response to Representative Buch,
clarified that 32 Bcf of gas per year is being shipped out of
state until 2011.
4:05:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CHENAULT asked to put on the record that without
having the ability to access the storage facility that recently,
at times, not enough gas would have been available to run the
consumer utilities. He related that the LNG facility has been
an integral part to the overall gas storage and distribution
system in the Cook Inlet. He suggested while some people may
believe that if the LNG facility went out of business it would
provide a solution to the Cook Inlet gas supply, their belief is
not based on fact.
CHAIR OLSON pointed out that Representative Chenault is
referring to a process called "peak shaving" when some of loads
destined for Japan have been shorted several times in the past
few years to provide additional gas to Southcentral during the
cold winters.
REPRESENTATIVE CHENAULT, in response to Chair Olson, stated he
did not recall the number of times that has occurred.
4:06:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH clarified he wanted to place on the record
that the state has a mechanism, integral to consumers in a
utility, and gas storage is a component which should also be
considered.
4:07:36 PM
DAN SULLIVAN, Mayor, Municipality of Anchorage, expressed
condolences for the loss of Jim Bowles, President, Conoco
Phillips, who was recently killed in a tragic accident. He
emphasized that HB 280 is important to Anchorage and to
Southcentral Alaska. He had the opportunity, as part of the
Municipality of Anchorage's Energy Task Force, to meet with
Representative Hawker on the bill. The three main areas this
bill covers are essential to the long-term energy future of Cook
Inlet gas, including the ability to create gas storage, provide
incentives to maintain and increase gas production in Cook
Inlet, and to clear any regulatory hurdles that may occur as
these types of contracts are being considered. He stressed it
is also important to keep the consumer in mind during this
process. The Municipality of Anchorage is concerned about the
declining production of natural gas, in particular, as it
relates to pressure. He stated that pressure is the key to
deliverability on cold winter days. He pointed out events in
the last two or last three years that resulted in deliverability
concerns. He characterized the Cook Inlet gas issue as not one
of shortage, but of pressure in the fields. Gas storage
facilities are important since they will help control pressure.
The MOA has taken several steps, including instituting the
Energy Watch Program, which requests consumers turn down their
thermostats for heat and turn off lights to conserve energy.
Initially, the results of this program have been outstanding,
but the state cannot rely on energy conservation alone as a
long-term solution.
4:10:10 PM
MAYOR SULLIVAN recalled during a discussion of the proposed gas
line and bullet line that someone once remarked "the solution to
Cook Inlet is Cook Inlet." He agreed. He surmised that Cook
Inlet holds 10 to 15 years of the necessary natural gas supply,
not counting any new discoveries. This bill, HB 280, does
several things the MOA supports, including the strong
requirement that any financial benefit from incentives in the
bill would flow through to the utilities to the benefit of their
consumers. He offered his belief that the 40 percent credit for
exploration expenses against production taxes provides a great
incentive to garner increased production in Cook Inlet.
Finally, directing the Department of Law to consider the impact
on consumers is important in the event the RCA rejects a
utility's gas supply contract. Thus, these three key elements
in HB 280 are reasons the MOA supports the bill. He related
that he would not go into the financial aspects of the bill.
4:12:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES asked how much of the gas storage capacity
in Cook Inlet is actually being used and any reasons it is not
being used.
KEVIN BANKS, Director, Division of Oil and Gas, Department of
Natural Resources (DNR), offered his belief that Ms. Foerster's
answer is correct, but to obtain a precise answer, it would be
necessary to ask the operators. He suspected the increased
capacity that results in gas storage costs money so an operator
would consider whether to drill another well or add compression
to the existing well. Gas storage may not be needed unless the
operator has customers to purchase the gas. He surmised that if
a producer has a market due to contract supply obligations, the
producer would likely spend to increase the capacity. He
suggested decisions for gas storage thus far may have been made
because it was less expensive to construct gas storage than
drill new wells since new wells might not be as productive as
older wells used to be.
4:14:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES stated that she does not have any specific
objections to the bill. She related that she was considering
many aspects of natural gas in Cook Inlet, including that new
wells are not being drilled, that the current Liquefied Natural
Gas (LNG) facility will be closing, any supply contracts, and
many other factors. She acknowledged the effort made in the
bill and expressed her interest is to be certain that everything
is considered in order to obtain sustainable gas in Cook Inlet.
CHAIR OLSON noted three people from the Department of Revenue
are available to answer tax questions.
4:15:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES asked whether Amendment 1 addresses the
concerns that the RCA had about jurisdiction.
RICHARD GAZAWAY, Advisory Section Manager, Regulatory Commission
of Alaska (RCA), answered that the RCA did ask for guidance on
jurisdiction over gas storage and the intent of the drafters is
clear. He offered that the RCA did not participate in drafting
so while the intent is clear, some improvements could be made in
the drafting.
4:16:35 PM
MR. GAZAWAY, in response to Representative Holmes, suggested
that the DOL could review the language. He referred to page 4,
line 12 of Amendment 1, which read:
(G) furnishing injection, storage, and
withdrawal services for natural gas that is owned by a
utility regulated under this chapter;"
MR. GAZAWAY suggested that the latter clause could use
clarification.
MR. GAZAWAY, in response to Representative Holmes, agreed to the
specific cite in Amendment 1.
MR. GAZAWAY, in response to Chair Olson, agreed that the RCA
could work to improve the specified language at next committee.
4:18:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN asked whether this bill would complement
an industrial user of gas who may need the flexibility to use
different volumes of gas.
MR. BANKS related his understanding that the expectation is that
storage would be similar to when an industrial user would shut
down during peak demand and inject gas to the local market. He
surmised that physically this would happen. Currently,
industrial users such as the LNG facility also do not have
storage relationships with the local consumers of gas. Thus,
unlike the proposed gas storage destined for consumers, with
presumably transparent pricing for the service, a similar
transparent pricing does not exist for the LNG plant.
Additionally, there is not necessarily a market for gas that is
redirected by the producer from the LNG facility. It is part of
their normal supply contract obligation. He restated that the
LNG plant does not participate in the local market in the same
way as the proposed storage facility would participate.
CHAIR OLSON characterized that the proposed storage facility as
operating more like a bank, with the owner having the ability to
pull out its gas when needed, but can also deposit any excess
gas.
MR. BANKS answered that is correct. He said to the extent gas
is owned by the utility, the state has some indication and
regulation over the price of the storage. However, price
indicators are not present in other situations, including the
LNG and producer-owned storage facilities.
4:21:32 PM
CHAIR OLSON, after first determining no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 280.
4:21:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN related his understanding of the need to
regulate gas facilities.
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN moved to report HB 280, Version 26-
LS1185\S, as amended, out of committee with individual
recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, CSHB 280 (L&C) was reported out of the
House Labor and Commerce Standing Committee.
4:24:10 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB280 Fiscal Note-CED-RCA-02-08-10.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 280 |
| HB315 ver A.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB280 Fiscal Note-DOA-AOGCC-02-08-10 (2).pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
|
| HB315 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB315 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB315 Fiscal Note-CED-CBPL-2-11-10.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB315 American Institute of CPAs FAQ.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB315 AICPA Mobility.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB315 AICPA Mobility Table.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB315 ASCPA Resolution.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB238 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 238 |
| HB238 Fiscal Note-CED-COM-2-11-10.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 238 |
| HB238 AHFC Comments.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 238 |
| HB238 HUD Letter 7-18-07.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 238 |
| HB280 Amendment S.2.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 280 |
| HB280 Sectional Analysis ver S as amended by S.2.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 280 |
| HB280 Summary of Amendments ver S.2.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 280 |
| HB280 Gas Storage Map.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 280 |
| HB280 Amendment S.3.pdf |
HL&C 2/15/2010 3:15:00 PM |
HB 280 |