Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
01/30/2024 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB279 | |
| HB182 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| *+ | HB 182 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 279 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 279-LOCAL BOUNDARY COMMISSION
8:03:54 AM
CHAIR MCCORMICK announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 279, "An Act relating to the Local Boundary
Commission; and providing for an effective date."
8:04:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE CRONK, Alaska State Legislature, prime
sponsor, presented HB 279. He shared the sponsor statement
[included in committee packets], which read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
House Bill 279 is adding language to existing statute
to accomplish three goals.
1. To ensure commissioners appointed from each of the
four Judicial Districts actually live and vote in
the Judicial District from which they are appointed.
2. To ensure that at least one of the five
Commissioners is from the unorganized Borough.
3. To ensure the Local Boundary Commission keeps an
updated record of the population of each community
in the state.
Note: The effective date is selected so the present
LBC makeup is retained until the next LBC seat
becomes open. At that time a person from the
unorganized borough will be selected.9
CHAIR MCCORMICK sought questions from committee members.
8:05:35 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked whether the updated population
record was an issue.
8:05:54 AM
DAVE STANCLIFF, Staff, Representative Mike Cronk, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Cronk, prime sponsor of
HB 279, said he did not know it was an issue. He shared an
anecdote in which the community of Tanana was asked to provide
data from the U.S. Census Bureau to the Local Boundary
Commission (LBC). He reasoned that it would be wise to make
census data available through the LBC rather than burdening
communities by requiring them to provide it.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT questioned the language on page 1, line
12 of the bill, which provided that the governor shall designate
the chair of the LBC.
MR. STANCLIFF indicated that it was a drafting decision to allow
the governor to select the most qualified individual.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked how the chair was selected on
other boards and commissions.
MR. STANCLIFF shared his understanding that typically, the body
at large determines the chair. However, since the LBC was a
constitutionally required commission, it was decided that the
governor should make that determination, as opposed to the
commissioners.
8:10:03 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MEARS asked whether there had been any discussion
with the LBC about the bill and its implications.
MR. STANCLIFF said [the bill sponsor's office] had made contact
with the Department of Commerce, Community & Economic
Development (DCCED) and asked for feedback. At this time, the
department had not communicated any concerns.
REPRESENTATIVE MEARS said she often utilized community data
through DCCED, which includes census data. She opined that the
requirement for the commission to hold census data seemed like a
duplication of effort.
MR. STANCLIFF said he felt that way too until it appeared that
[DCCED] needed to receive data from the communities as opposed
to another agency.
REPRESENTATIVE MEARS suggested that it would be appropriate for
the department to testify at a future hearing.
8:13:34 AM
REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE asked whether there was an anticipated
cost to maintaining this record.
MR. STANCLIFF responded that there should be no cost, as the
data can be sent electronically to the LBC at any time.
REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE stated, "Them maintaining the record
does not require them to use the record." He questioned what
would prevent the commission from still requiring communities to
obtain their own data. He suggested including language that
states, "Maintain for each community a record and then use that
record."
MR. STANCLIFF indicated that the bill sponsor preferred an
unambiguous approach to statute changes. He added that
Representative Ruffridge's comments made sense.
8:17:24 AM
CHAIR MCCORMICK announced that HB 279 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 279 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HCRA 1/30/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 279 |
| HB 279 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HCRA 1/30/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 279 |
| HB 182 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HCRA 1/30/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 182 |
| HB 182 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HCRA 1/30/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 182 |
| HB 182 Zero Fiscal Note DOA-DMV.pdf |
HCRA 1/30/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 182 |
| HB 182 Fiscal Note DPS.pdf |
HCRA 1/30/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 182 |
| HB 279 Fiscal Note DCCED DCRA.pdf |
HCRA 1/30/2024 8:00:00 AM |
HB 279 |