Legislature(2023 - 2024)GRUENBERG 120
03/13/2024 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB358 | |
HB254 | |
HB278 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ | HB 358 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 254 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | HB 278 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 278-ADMIN. REGULATION REVIEW DIVISION 2:29:14 PM CHAIR VANCE announced that the final order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 278, "An Act establishing the administrative regulation review division." 2:29:32 PM REPRESENTATIVE BEN CARPENTER, Alaska State Legislature, on behalf of the House Special Committee on Ways and Means, sponsor by request, chaired by Representative Carpenter, presented HB 278. He paraphrased the sponsor statement [included in the committee packet], which read as follows [original punctuation provided]: According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, Alaska's economic growth is the worst in the nation. It is imperative that we grow the private economy. One way to do this is by decreasing the high regulatory burden Alaskan's have when doing business. In current law, AS 44.62 (Administrative Procedures Act) allows for the Governor or Lieutenant Governor's review of regulations, requires the Department of Law to advise agencies on regulations, and requires public notice and public comment. There is no specific requirement for Legislative review of proposed regulations, nor any action that the Legislature can take on them. Also included in As. 44.62, government corporations are exempt from the Administrative Procedures Act. HB 278 would establish an Administrative Regulation Review Division, a vital mechanism to ensure transparency, accountability, and efficiency in the regulatory process within the State of Alaska. It also Removes the Government corporations' exemptions from regulatory review from law. The Administrative Regulation Review Division will serve as a permanent staff agency under the oversight of the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee. Its primary function is to facilitate thorough legislative review of administrative regulations filed by the Lieutenant Governor. This will be achieved through comprehensive assessment of proposed regulations, ensuring alignment with legislative intent, statutory authority, and consistency with applicable laws. The administrative regulation review division will be tasked with several key responsibilities: 1. Reviewing all administrative regulations to ensure they properly implement legislative intent. 2. Providing comments and recommendations to the governor and state agencies on proposed regulations. 3. Investigating findings transmitted by standing committees regarding regulations inconsistent with legislative intent. 4. Promoting needed amendments or repeals of regulations deemed inappropriate or outdated. 5. Recommending legislative action to annul regulations found to be inconsistent with legislative intent. Furthermore, the Division will have the authority to examine all administrative regulations, including proposed adoptions, amendments, or orders of repeal. It will provide expert commentary and recommendations to the governor and state agencies, promoting necessary amendments or repeals when regulations deviate from legislative intent or fail to meet statutory standards. HB 278 aims to simplify regulatory compliance process, ensure regulatory compliance with legislative intent, and provide a mechanism for continuous improvement in our regulatory framework. This will in turn create a better business environment for our State. 2:35:30 PM KENDRA BROUSSARD, Staff, Representative Ben Carpenter, Alaska state Legislature, on behalf of the House Special Committee on Ways and Means, sponsor by request, chaired by Representative Carpenter, presented the sectional analysis [included in the committee packet], which read as follows [original punctuation provided]: Section 1 Adds language to conform to new Administrative Procedures language added by this bill to the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) adjudication section of law. Section 2 Removes the exemption for the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation from the APA. Section 3 Amends the Legislature statute to require the legislature to review every proposed regulatory action before the date the regulation is scheduled to be adopted, amended, or repealed. Section 4 Adds a language to the Legislature statute to require standing committees to review proposed regulatory actions and transmit its findings to a new division under the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee (LB&A) established by this bill. Section 5 Amends Fiscal Note statute to include LB&A in agencies deadline reporting requirements. Section 6 Adds new language to the Legislature statute allow the Legislative Affairs Agency to review proposed regulations and to assign an attorney for such review. Section 7 Adds new sections to the Legislature statute to create a permanent staff agency responsible to the LB&A Committee for the purpose of providing legislative review of administrative regulations filed by the Lieutenant Governor, named the Administrative Regulation Review Division. Allows the LB&A Committee to hire staff and requires the Legislative Affairs Agency to provide legal assistance to the new Division. Gives the following powers to the Division: (1) Require state officials to give full cooperation to the Division, (2) Examine all regulations to determine whether they would properly implement legislative intent, (3) Prepare and distribute reports and materials, (4) Investigate findings submitted by a standing committee, and (5) If necessary, recommend that LB&A introduce legislation to annul adoption of regulations. Section 8 Removes the exemption for the Alaska Aerospace Corporation from the APA. Section 9 Removes the exemption for the Adak Reuse Authority from the APA. Section 10 Removes the exemption for the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation from the APA. Section 11 Removes the exemption for the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation from the APA. Section 12 Conforming language for DNR state lands statute APA requirements. Section 13 Adds to Public Records statute exemptions legal communications between the Executive and Legislature regarding regulatory review. Section 14 Conforming language. Section 15 Conforming language. Section 16 Adds to the Governor's requirements under the APA to add issues raised by Administrative Regulatory Review Division to reasons the Governor may return a proposed regulation to an adopting agency. Section 17 Adds to public notice requirements under the APA that copies of proposed regulations be furnished to the LLA when distributed to the public. Section 18-20 Conforming language. Section 21 Adds a new section to APA statute to require the Lieutenant Governor to submit filed regulations to the Administrative Regulatory Review Division along with their fiscal notes, requires agencies to submit proposed regulations to the Review Division when submitted to the Governor, and gives the Review Division 10 days to submit comments to the Governor. Section 22-26 Conforming language. Section 27 Removes the exemption for the Alaska Energy Authority from the APA. Section 28 Adds to uncodified law that this Act applies to adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation that is first proposed on or after the effective date of this Act. 2:39:45 PM REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER explained that the legislature, while in session, is mostly consumed with bills drafted during session and has little time for regulatory review. He noted there would likely be a fairly substantial fiscal note associated with setting up a permanent division to do this task. Nonetheless, he said if better, more efficient governance is the goal, there should be a permanent division to review regulations that can be costly in time and action within the public sector. 2:41:51 PM REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER said he liked the legislation. He sought asked whether Sections 3 and 4, which directed standing committees to take certain action, would be considered intent language. REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER confirmed that the Regulatory Review Division would not have the authority to direct legislators within a standing committee to take action. 2:42:48 PM REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked how the proposed legislation relates to the "sunset commission bill." REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER said the two entities would be completely different. The proposed sunset commission, composed of commissioners appointed by the governor and the legislature, would be created underneath the Office of the Lieutenant Governor to review departments over time. Conversely, this division would fall underneath the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee for the purpose of reviewing new regulations. REPRESENTATIVE GRAY speculated that the staff would be entrusted to do the work. He asked what would be expected of the legislators and full-time staff. REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER explained that if [the Regulatory Review Division] were created, there would be staff, similar to [Legislative Finance Division], with a mission and a director. The division's work would be reported to the chair [of the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee]. He likened the proposed division to a standing committee with a full-time staff existing under Legislative Budget and Audit Committee for interim supervision to pursue regulatory review. REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked whether there would be a framework for the division of labor. REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER said the sooner it starts, the sooner it's finished. He acknowledged that there would need to be a division of effort and prioritization. 2:48:40 PM REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER shared his understanding that there used to be a special House committee for regulatory review. He suggested creating a special or permanent standing committee for regulatory review. REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER said the focus of the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee is work during interim, whereas for standing committees, it's not. He argued that with a standing committee, it could be a challenge to find initiative during the interim. REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER suggested that there could be value in creating a standing committee to receive referrals for bills promulgating the creation of new regulatory structures in statute. REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER acknowledged that, arguably, the same effect could be achieved by creating a standing committee, but there would still need to be full-time staff to do the work. 2:52:39 PM REPRESENTATIVE C. JOHNSON recalled that the problem with the [Administrative Regulation Review Committee] was the change in membership every two years; consequently, certain vendettas against certain things politicized the committee and hindered its functionality and efficiency. 2:54:07 PM CHAIR VANCE questioned the current process for regulation review by the legislature. REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER said the process is spelled out in AS 04.25.182. CHAIR VANCE questioned how the bill would impact the length of time it takes to adopt new regulations. She asked the bill sponsor to clarify the relationship between the proposed division and the process of reviewing regulation in the next bill hearing. [HB 278 was held over.]
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 358 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFSH 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
HB 358 - v.A.pdf |
HFSH 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
HB 358 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
HB 358 - Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
HB 358 - Alaska Broadcasters Association - Support of Policy.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
HB 358 - Backup Document Articles & Research.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
HB 254 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
HB 254 - v.A.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
HB 254 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
HB 254 - Slideshow Presentation.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
HB 254 - Letters of Support.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
HB 254 - Top 13 Age Verification APIs in 2023.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
HB 254 - Age Verfication Petition.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
HB 278 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HSTA 4/23/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 278 |
HB 278 - v.A.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HSTA 4/23/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 278 |
HB 278 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HSTA 4/23/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 278 |
HB 278 - Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HSTA 4/23/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 278 |
HB 254 - Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |