Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/20/2000 09:10 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 277
"An Act relating to payment of retirement benefits for
subsequently reemployed retired members of the
teachers' retirement system."
DARROLL HARGRAVES, Executive Director, Alaska Council of
School Administrators commended the Committee for
considering the serious teacher shortage developing in
Alaska. He added that field reports indicate that it is
becoming more difficult to find qualified and certifiable
teachers to enter classrooms, as well as Administrator
slots. He commended the Committee on subsection (b) on
page two as well.
Senator P. Kelly stated that Alaska should seriously
consider alternatives to certification in order to fill
these teaching positions.
Co-Chair Torgerson asked for an explanation related to this
legislation's fiscal note, especially the associated
benefits, which might go up an additional ten percent. He
asked what section of the bill this increase referred to.
GUY BELL, Director, Division of Retirement and Benefits,
Department of Administration responded that actuaries had
looked at the state's cost for a person who, after 20 years
retires and then is rehired. He noted that this reference
reflected a ten-percent increase in the net present value
of the expected life line value of this individual's
benefits. He continued that if half the members decided to
participate the cost to the system would be about .75
percent of Teachers' Retirement System (TRS) payroll, which
would be about $3.6 million. He gave an example of a
teacher with 20 years of service at a high salary of
$50,000 per year. He explained that if a teacher was
rehired back into the system, the second retirement would
be calculated on the teacher's higher salary, while not
affecting their original benefits.
BILL CHURCH, Retirement Supervisor, Division of Retirement
& Benefits, Department of Administration added that an
individual who had participated in a Retirement Incentive
Plan (RIP) and who was rehired would lose the incentive
credit given at their original retirement. He continued
with the example of a teacher first hired under the Tier 1
level of benefits, who retires at age 43 after 17 years of
service. He noted that this individual would not be
eligible to commence this first benefit until they reached
age 55 for a normal benefit or age 50 for an early benefit.
He noted that this would be the penalty for returning to
employment, although this does not prevent anyone who has
retired from being eligible for rehire under this scenario.
Co-Chair Parnell referred to the teacher shortage as
previously noted and asked how many new teachers are
presently needed in the state. He wondered what the annual
gross on average was in Alaska and if this was not enough,
he asked what it should be.
Mr. Guy responded that the state must consider how many
teachers are quitting and how many are retiring. He noted
that about 500 teachers retire each year and guessed that
the same amount of teachers leave for various other
reasons. He added that about the same number of teachers
come into the system for any given year. He generally
stated that there are 10,000 teachers in the system
statewide, with roughly a 10 percent annual turnover.
Co-Chair Parnell stated that it seemed the numbers were
staying level, along with a population decrease statewide.
He wondered if there was a need for this legislation with
these types of projections.
Mr. Church responded that districts were reporting
shortages in some disciplines, something that has been on
going for many years.
Co-Chair Parnell declared that he thought this legislation
was a short-term fix and that it does not look towards the
future, as to recruit and keep teachers.
Tape: SFC - 00 #102, Side A, 10:49 AM
Senator Green stated that this shortage of teachers was
cyclical, just the same as overages. She noted that this
was not an unusual phenomenon.
Co-Chair Torgerson inquired about the advantage or
disadvantage of a teacher who works twenty years and
retires, as versus a teacher that stays on for the same
period of time.
Mr. Bell responded that he could not think of any advantage
one way or the other.
Mr. Church added that either way, after twenty years, an
individual would receive the same multiplier, which
increases after twenty years from two percent per year to
two and a half percent per year.
Co-Chair Torgerson stated that HB 277 would be HELD in
Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|