Legislature(2013 - 2014)BARNES 124
02/04/2014 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB199 | |
| HB223 | |
| HB275 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 199 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 223 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 275 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 275-ELECTRONIC DISTRIB. OF REPORTS/NOTICES
8:18:11 AM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 275, "An Act relating to electronic
publication of certain municipal notices and to publication and
electronic distribution of reports by state agencies."
8:18:22 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE HAWKER, Alaska State Legislature, speaking
as sponsor of HB 275, informed the committee that a couple of
years ago House legislation similar to HB 275 died in the final
committee of referral in the Senate. This legislation, HB 275,
mandates that certain reports prepared by state agencies are
distributed electronically rather than published in a paper
format and are readily accessible on the state's online public
notice system. He acknowledged that the legislature created
this problem by mandating that the state agencies produce
reports. Rather than doing an inventory of the reports and
determining what is or is not of continuing relevance, HB 275
proposes to make publishing of the reports more efficient,
effective, and less expensive by using electronic publishing.
Municipalities in the state, specifically the Municipality of
Anchorage, have requested the second component of HB 275, which
allows municipalities to adopt ordinances that would allow the
municipality to post their own public notices on a web site
available to the public rather than having to print them in a
newspaper of general distribution. Representative Hawker then
directed attention to the sectional analysis and reviewed that
Sections 1-3 are about the aforementioned municipal provisions.
Section 4 adds the electronic reports of state agencies to the
list of items to be placed on the state's online public notice
system maintained by the lieutenant governor. Section 5
addresses the electronic distribution and posting. He then
emphasized that it's difficult to know the impact of the mandate
in HB 275 on each state agency. Therefore, the legislation
includes particular exceptions on page 5, lines 1-6. The
language on page 5, lines 13-17, specifies that the use of a
professional contracted photographer [for the graphic design and
photographs] of the report is only allowed if no other qualified
agency employee is available or if it would be cheaper to hire a
contractor. He then reviewed the definitions provided on page
5, lines 18-26. He noted that HB 275 includes two fiscal notes,
including one from the Office of the Lieutenant Governor that
specifies HB 275 can be implemented with no additional changes
for use of the online public use system. The second fiscal note
specifies that HB 275 creates no cost to the state, but will
have cost savings albeit an unknown amount.
8:28:42 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON related his understanding that HB 275
implies that municipalities can publish both the newspaper and
electronic public notice.
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER explained that the concept is to empower
municipalities to make the decision because statute already
specifies that municipalities must publish notice in newspapers
of general circulation. He stated his belief in the state not
making mandates. This legislation doesn't mandate that every
municipality in the state subject to these publication notices
establish an Internet web site. In specific response to
Representative Herron, Representative Hawker confirmed that
municipalities can both [publish the notice in a newspaper and
electronically].
8:30:18 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON referred to the language on page 2, lines
23-24, which read: "a municipality may by ordinance provide for
electronic publication by posting the notice for three
consecutive weeks on a municipal Internet website accessible to
the public". He then asked if the language could be changed to
refer to 21 consecutive days.
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER answered that [the committee could change
the language] to whatever suits its pleasure.
8:30:48 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON asked if there has been any push back from
small businesses in terms of a reduction in the advertising of
small businesses.
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER pointed out that this is the first
committee of referral for HB 275 and he hasn't received any push
back at this time. However, he noted his expectation to hear
from those entities that run the publishing corporations as it's
in their best interest to have special interest legislation
supporting their business, although he wasn't sure it's in the
[state's] best interest to do so.
8:31:41 AM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD characterized HB 275 as a positive step,
noting that the private sector has already been addressing such
matters.
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER commented that HB 275 addresses just the
tip of the iceberg, but is a realistic and appropriate place to
start.
8:32:27 AM
REPRESENTATIVE FOSTER agreed with the sponsor regarding the
thick annual reports and fancy photographs that aren't
necessary. However, he expressed concern with those rural
communities that don't have access to the Internet. Therefore,
he inquired as to the sponsor's thoughts on the aforementioned
situation and perhaps exempting those communities of certain
smaller size.
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER said although he shares Representative
Foster's concern, he believes the permissive nature of HB 275
accommodates that concern. The legislation exempts those
communities that want to be exempted while empowering those that
wish to utilize the Internet for online publications.
Representative Hawker clarified that he doesn't want to guess
the needs or wishes of any communities, which is why HB 275 is
permissive and doesn't impose a mandate on either side of the
issue.
8:35:49 AM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX posed a scenario in which there is a foreclosure
and related her assumption that the individual who is being
foreclosed on would receive written notice through the postal
service not just Internet notice.
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER clarified that HB 275 only addresses the
municipal entity that might be foreclosing posting notice of
redemption periods and such and has nothing to do with the legal
process of executing a foreclosure. He further clarified that
all of the legal actions and notices required to be delivered to
the involved parties are unaffected by HB 275, only
municipalities' publishing public notices regarding that
activity are impacted.
8:37:17 AM
REPRESENTATIVE FOSTER then expressed concern that the proposal
in HB 275 changes public notice to a public search.
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER said that he holds that concern as well.
In conversations with [the operator of] the online public notice
system, he said the concept would be that they would publish the
notice and maintain an index that would make it easier to locate
and identify these reports. He emphasized that it's incumbent
upon the state to continue to recognize the need to make this
information readily accessible to the public in a format that is
intuitive and easy to access.
8:39:41 AM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX opened public testimony.
8:42:06 AM
KATHIE WASSERMAN, Executive Director, Alaska Municipal League
(AML), thanked Representative Hawker for sponsoring HB 275,
particularly as it provides communities the ability to decide
what works best for them. She acknowledged Representative
Foster's concerns, but pointed out that the smaller the
communities, the more contact the city employees have with the
public on a day-to-day basis. Therefore, when something isn't
properly posted [in smaller communities], one suffers mightily
for it. Ms. Wasserman noted that the majority of her job is
spent helping municipalities operate more efficiently and
effectively. She opined that although the proposal in HB 275
may be ahead of its time for some of the smaller communities, it
is needed and AML stands ready to help communities work through
this proposal. In conclusion, Ms. Wasserman related support for
HB 275.
8:44:56 AM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX, upon determining no one else wished to testify,
closed public testimony.
8:45:13 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER noted his appreciation for the committee's
consideration of HB 275.
8:45:30 AM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX remarked that she really likes HB 275.
8:46:14 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER, speaking to an amendment included in the
committee packet, acknowledged that the language "without a
specific request" on page 5, lines 20-21, is a bit vague. The
language is meant to address those things agencies generate that
one doesn't call up and request. There was the thought that the
language might be redundant because the language on page 5,
lines 5-6, provides the head of an agency or its designee to
operate its agency. Representative Hawker said he had no
problem with passing the amendment.
8:47:40 AM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD moved to adopt the following amendment,
labeled 288-LS0999\C.1, Nauman, 1/31/14:
Page 5, lines 20 - 21;
Delete "without a specific request"
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX objected for discussion purposes. There being
no discussion, Co-Chair LeDoux withdrew her objection.
There being no further objection, the amendment was adopted.
8:48:12 AM
CO-CHAIR NAGEAK moved to report HB 275, as amended, out of
committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying
fiscal note. There being no objection, CSHB 275(CRA) was
reported from the House Community and Regional Affairs Standing
Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 199 ver U.pdf |
HCRA 1/28/2014 8:00:00 AM HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HCRA 1/28/2014 8:00:00 AM HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB199 fiscal Note DPS.pdf |
HCRA 1/28/2014 8:00:00 AM HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 DPS Draft Revised VPSO Regs.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Information Hearing Supporting Documents.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Informational Meeting Summary 9 26 2013.pdf |
HCRA 1/28/2014 8:00:00 AM HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Information Hearing Supporting Documents.pdf |
HCRA 1/28/2014 8:00:00 AM HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Supporting Document ADN Article.pdf |
HCRA 1/28/2014 8:00:00 AM HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Supporting Document ADN Editor Letter.pdf |
HCRA 1/28/2014 8:00:00 AM HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Supporting Document Alaska Dispatch.pdf |
HCRA 1/28/2014 8:00:00 AM HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Supporting Document Letter Robert Claus.pdf |
HCRA 1/28/2014 8:00:00 AM HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Supporting Document Letters.pdf |
HCRA 1/28/2014 8:00:00 AM HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Supporting Document McCarthy Letter.pdf |
HCRA 1/28/2014 8:00:00 AM HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Supporting Document Coons.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Supporting Document Wasserman.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 199 Supporting Document Kamai.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| HB 223 ver A.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 223 |
| HB 223 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 223 |
| HB 223 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 223 |
| HB 223 Letter of Support FEDCO.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 223 |
| HB 223 Letter of Support FNSB.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 223 |
| HB 223 Support docs.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 223 |
| HB 275 ver C.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 275 |
| HB 275 sponsor statement.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 275 |
| HB 275 Sectional.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 275 |
| HB 275 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 275 |
| HB 275 Amendment C.1.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 275 |
| HB 275 Legal memo.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 275 |
| HB 275 OMB Doc.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 275 |
| HB 275 letter of support MOA.pdf |
HCRA 2/4/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 275 |