Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/18/2000 05:45 PM Senate RLS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 272-MUNICIPAL TAX: LOW INCOME HOUSING
CHAIRMAN KELLY announced that a proposed Senate Rules Committee
substitute had been drafted labeled "Version T."
MR. JONATHAN LACK, legislative aide to Representative Halcro,
sponsor of the measure, explained Version T as follows. Version T
is Representative Halcro's preferred version. It says that for
IRS-qualified low income housing, the municipal assessment shall be
based on the actual income derived from the property recognizing
the deed restrictions on that property. The second change says
that the governing body of the local municipality shall determine
by ordinance whether the properties that qualify for the low income
housing tax credits after the date of the act shall be exempt from
the requirements of the assessment procedure in the first section.
For properties that have been exempted by ordinance, the governing
body may determine by parcel which method of assessment will be
used and may not change the manner of assessment if there is
outstanding original debt on that property.
CHAIRMAN KELLY asked if "by parcel," Mr. Lack meant by project.
MR. LACK said yes.
CHAIRMAN KELLY stated that all of the old projects are grand
fathered in and any new projects are local option - project by
project.
MR. LACK agreed.
SENATOR LEMAN clarified, for the record, that the term "actual
income derived" pertains to that market. It does not mean that
someone can, through bad management, actually cause a depression of
the market value of that property. It is actual income derived at
market and that the assessor assumed some type of vacancy factor
for income property that is applied for that particular unit.
MR. LACK agreed that is correct and noted that he spoke with the
state assessor, Steve VanZant. The term "actual income derived
from the property" means at market so if a property has a 60
percent occupancy but the market provides for an 80 percent
occupancy, it will be assessed at 80 percent. That will provide no
incentive for an owner to underfill a unit to get a break on
property taxes. The amendment that came out of the Senate Finance
Committee added "at full occupancy." The intent was to address a
situation in which someone might intentionally underfill a unit.
That amendment was problemative because "at full occupancy" ends up
meaning that if there is a significant downturn in the rental
market, for example if Elmendorf Airforce Base closed, ten percent
would be the market occupancy rate and the unit would still have to
pay taxes on 100 percent occupancy. Version T clears that problem
up.
SENATOR ELLIS moved to adopt Version T as the Senate Rules
Committee substitute. There being no objection, the motion
carried.
SENATOR LEMAN moved to calendar all Senate versions of HB 272 for
calendaring at the Chairman's discretion. There being no
objection, the motion carried.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|