Legislature(2011 - 2012)BUTROVICH 205
03/29/2012 09:00 AM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB206 | |
| HB316 | |
| HB271 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 206 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 316 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 271 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 271-COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE REQUIREMENTS
9:59:55 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI announced that the next bill before the
committee would be HB 271, which changes the definition of
commercial vehicles.
REPRESENTATIVE WES KELLER, sponsor of HB 271, introduced the
bill. He related that the bill changes the definition of
commercial vehicles to adapt to the new and better vehicles of
today. It modernizes the law and reduces regulation on small
businesses and owners of commercial vehicles.
JIM POUND, staff, Representative Wes Keller, summarized HB 271.
He said that the bill would make doing business in Alaska a
little easier and less costly. Transporting goods in pickup
trucks and step vans is typically done by small business owners
in Alaska. Those vehicles are currently classified as commercial
vehicles. HB 271 will increase gross vehicle weight restrictions
from the current 10,000 pounds to 14,000 pounds. Today's light-
to-medium trucks are larger than when the original language in
the law was written in 1999.
He gave an example of where a small business owner, currently
classified as commercial, would run into problems under the
current language with additional costs such as insurance,
registration, inspections, and the cost of a medical exam for
the vehicle operator. Change in the weight allocation makes the
average one-ton pickup truck non-commercial.
He noted that the same rules apply for pilot vehicles. Many
younger Alaskans are looking to get into the trucking industry
and this bill would give them an opportunity to operate a more
efficient one-ton vehicle as a pilot vehicle.
10:02:24 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI requested an explanation of the technical
changes.
MR. POUND reported that Section 1 deals with regulations in
statutes in conjunction with federal law.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked about page 1, lines 8-10, and the
purpose for removing regulations that are necessary to avoid
loss or withholding of federal highway money.
DAN BREEDEN, Director, Division of Measurement Standards &
Commercial Vehicle Enforcement, Department of Transportation,
provided information related to HB 271. He explained that the
removal of that language is to prevent the loss of federal
highway funding and to make regulations that would withstand
court challenges.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked what was being amended.
MR. BREEDEN clarified that the language was not clear and was
challenged in court. The intent is to avoid the loss of federal
highway funding.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked if the intent is to prevent Alaska from
being potentially at risk for loss of federal highway funds.
MR. BREEDEN said it was a moot point.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI summarized that the current statute says that
the state can only adopt regulations regarding size, weight, and
load provisions, and adopting those regulations might cause the
state to lose federal highway funding.
MR. BREEDEN replied that some interpret it that way.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI restated that HB 271 would change that and
give the state more flexibility in allowing the state to adopt
regulations regarding size, weight, and load provisions that may
or may not affect federal highway funds.
MR. BREEDEN said yes.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI requested clarification of Section 2.
10:07:00 AM
MR. POUND explained that on page 1, line 14, the words "for
commercial purposes" were added to clarify that it was for
commercial motor vehicles. On page 2, line 7, the words "is used
in the transportation of materials found by the United States
Secretary of Transportation to be hazardous for purposes of 49
U.S.C 5101 - 5128" were deleted.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked why the change on page 1, line 14, was
necessary.
MR. POUND explained that it clarifies that the vehicles are
specifically being used for commercial purposes.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked why that was important.
MR. BREEDEN explained that there were vehicles that were not
being used in commerce that are being forced to be regulated
when they would not need to be.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked for the practical implication of that
change.
MR. BREEDEN clarified if a person is not in commerce, then their
vehicle should not be considered a commercial vehicle.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked why the word "intrastate" is used if it is
referring to commerce. He suggested it should be "intrastate"
and "interstate".
MR. BREEDEN said bill would only affect intrastate vehicles,
because the definition of interstate commerce is still 10,000
pounds.
SENATOR PASKVAN pointed out that it was meaningless to limit it
to intrastate. He reiterated that commercial purposes include
interstate commerce.
MR. BREEDEN said the Federal Motor Carriers Safety
Administration (FMCSA) has a clear definition of the difference
between "intrastate" and "interstate". This legislation would
affect intrastate vehicles only because of vehicle weight
standards.
10:09:57 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI agreed with Senator Paskvan's point. He
pointed out that Supreme Court has a very broad definition of
"interstate", which is any commercial transaction that has been
deemed by the Supreme Court to be an "interstate" transaction.
He suggested having an attorney from Legislative Legal address
the issue.
MR. POUND continued to explain changes in Section 2. On page 2,
line 7, language was deleted because it is redundant with
federal law. That same change is also made on page 3, in
Section 3.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked for the rationale behind removing the
words, "is used in the transportation of materials found by the
United States Secretary of Transportation to be hazardous for
purposes of 49 U.S.C 5101 - 5128."
MR. BREEDEN related that all hazardous material operations are
under federal law already.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked why the words were included in bill in
the first place.
MR. BREEDEN thought it was due to a lack of understanding.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI inquired about the addition of the word
"motor" on page 2, line 12.
MR. POUND said it was a technical change.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked about the change on page 2, line 20,
the deletion of the word "recreational."
MR. POUND explained that it was a reference to motor homes which
are not commercial vehicles.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked for the definition of recreational
vehicles.
MR. BREEDEN said that the definition of recreational vehicles
lies with the Division of Motor vehicles and they are exempt
from all things associated with commercial motor vehicles.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked for a practical implication for
removing recreational vehicles from Section 3.
MR. BREEDEN clarified that the reason is simply to exempt
recreational vehicles from the requirements of commercial
vehicles.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI inquired if recreational vehicle owners are
currently required to pay commercial fees.
MR. BREEDEN explained that they were considered a commercial
vehicle when used for deliveries, but three years ago the FMCSA
clarified language making recreational vehicles exempt from
commercial regulations.
10:14:19 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked if it would result in recreational
vehicle owners not having to buy insurance.
MR. BREEDEN said the removal of the language was further
clarification to remove recreational vehicles from any
commercial arena.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked if there was any practical change.
MR. BREEDEN said no.
MR. POUND referred to Section 3 as "the meat of the bill." It
adds words to distinguish between vehicles greater than 10,000
pounds used for interstate commerce and vehicles greater than
14,000 pounds used for intrastate commerce in order to show the
separation of the two classes of vehicles.
SENATOR MEYER said he appreciated the list of classes of
vehicles which are not commercial vehicles. He asked if Class 3
trucks would also be exempted.
MR. POUND said Class 3 trucks would be exempted up to 14,000
pounds.
SENATOR MEYER gave an example of a plumber who would need a Ford
450 truck weighing 16,000 pounds in order to do business.
MR. POUND thought it would be rated as a commercial vehicle.
SENATOR MEYER suggested that the limit be raised to 16,000
pounds for non-commercial vehicles.
MR. POUND noted that the legislation was based on considering
one-ton trucks and doolies.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER added that he followed the recommendations
of the Alaska Trucking Association when drafting the
legislation.
10:17:53 AM
SENATOR MEYER wondered how difficult it is to obtain a DOT
number.
MR. BREEDEN replied that the process of getting a U.S. DOT
number for intrastate use is easy to do on line or in person.
The difference between an interstate and intrastate number is
$300, with the forms being the same.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked Mr. Pound if there were any other
changes in Section 3.
MR. POUND responded that redundant language was removed.
MR. BREEDEN stated support for HB 271.
10:19:34 AM
SCOTT HICKS, Vice President-Operations, Alaska West Express, and
Vice President, Alaska Trucking Association (ATA), testified in
support of HB 271. He related that a legislative priority of
ATA's was to change the definition of intrastate commercial
vehicle to reduce the regulatory burden on small businesses. He
justified the need to change motor vehicle weight requirements.
He talked about the current requirements for pilot vehicles,
which would be changed for the better by the legislation. He
urged the committee to act favorably on the bill.
10:22:32 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI noted that someone from the Department of Law
could address a previous question on the bill.
ANMEI GOLDSMITH, Assistant Attorney General, Transportation
Section, Department of Law, answered questions related to HB
271. She addressed the issue of intrastate versus interstate
commerce. She referred to a case that found that commerce that
happens within a state affects commerce that happens across
state boundaries; therefore, Congress can regulate intrastate
commerce. She explained that statutes that cover commercial
motor vehicles make a distinction between interstate commerce
and intrastate commerce. Congress says that interstate commerce
will be regulated by federal law, but intrastate commerce will
not be governed by federal law. The State of Alaska can regulate
intrastate commercial motor vehicles.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked if HB 271 would create a conflict with
federal law for vehicles between 10,000 and 14,000 pounds.
MS. GOLDSMITH said the intent of the bill is to raise the gross
vehicle weight for vehicles used only for intrastate commercial
business, so she did not think so.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked what the lower weight limit is.
10:27:51 AM
MS. GOLDSMITH said she would have to double check weight
regulations.
MR. BREEDEN responded that federal regulations allow states to
regulate vehicles under 26,000 pounds.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked if anything in the bill could result in
Alaska losing federal highway money.
MR. BREEDEN said he did not know.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked if the bill deletes statutory language
regarding commercial licenses for vehicles carrying hazardous
materials.
MR. BREEDEN said no. All hazardous material laws would apply
regardless of the size of the vehicle.
10:30:12 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI said HB 271 would be held in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 206 Full Text.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB206-DNR-MLW-03-23-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 IMCC Back-Up - What We Do.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 - Memo of Understanding.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 IMCC Back-Up - Background.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 Support Document-AMA Letter.PDF |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 IMCC Back-Up - Member States.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 IMCC Back-Up - Welcome.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| 1- HB0316 ver I- Bill.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| 2- HB 316 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| QA on HB316 memo.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316-Fiscal Note-DMVA-MVA-CO-02-13-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316-DOR-AHFC-02-10-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316-DCCED-AIDEA-02-10-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316-DCCED-AIDEA-02-28-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| 7- HB 316- Rep Saddler Testimony.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB0316A.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| CSHB 271 (TRA).pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| CSHB 271 Fiscal.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| CSHB 271(TRA) H. Floor amend 1.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| CSHB0271-1-2-022212-ADM-N.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| CSHB271 Support Renovators.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| Hb 271 Ak Truck support.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Fed Standard CMV.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 NFIB Support.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| Hb 271 Norcom Operations.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Norcom.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| Hb 271 St. John support.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Vehicle classes.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HHB 271 Support enstar.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB271 AGC Letter.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB0271A.PDF |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 SPONSOR.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB271-DOA-DMV-2-17-12 (3).pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |