Legislature(2013 - 2014)BARNES 124
02/06/2014 01:00 PM House TRANSPORTATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB271 | |
| HB260 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 260 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 271 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 271-APPROP: RAILROAD FEASIBILITY STUDY
1:09:24 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 271, "An Act making a special appropriation to
the University of Alaska Fairbanks for a study of the
feasibility of constructing a railroad between Fairbanks and
Deadhorse; and providing for an effective date."
1:09:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON, speaking as sponsor, stated that HB 271
is timely given the catastrophic news of Flint Hills Resources
(FHR) refinery shutting down. Historically, FHR has
significantly contributed to the Alaska Railroad Corporation's
(ARRC) revenue. In the early 2000s, FHR provided over 55
percent of the railroad's revenues, but it is now down to 15-20
percent and soon it will be less. He reminded members that this
committee assists Alaskans to make connections to communities,
resources, opportunities, and markets. He recalled during his
time serving as mayor of North Pole asking ARRC's president &
CEO Pat Gamble and later Roald Aadnesen whether the railroad
should be expanded north, west, or south. He reported their
responses were that the railroad should have gone north from the
beginning. He said that an expanded railroad could be the
engine of prosperity for Alaska, especially with so much
resource activity in northern Alaska. He referred to a study in
members' packets entitled "Economic Impact of a North Slope Rail
Extension on Northern Energy and Mineral Development" by Paul
Metz, Colin Brooks, and Mike Billmire that reviews the impacts
of a North Slope rail extension on northern energy and mineral
development.
1:13:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON remarked on construction activity,
including that Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority
(AIDEA) is currently working to construct a road to the Ambler
Mining District. Further, North Slope oil and gas and mineral
activity between Deadhorse and Fairbanks could be put into
production. He stated that Ted Leonard, Executive Director,
AIDEA, said that the role of the state is to prove the
feasibility and conduct Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
prior to the private sector investing and developing in
projects. For example, Red Dog is currently buying back a road
that AIDEA initially financed, he said.
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON offered his belief that the
transportation of the heavy sand, steel, cement, equipment, and
fuel necessary to bring shale oil development to Alaska's oil
fields and is estimated to be over 2 million tons. That
potential rail transportation equals approximately five 10,000
ton-freight trains per week, which translates to one hundred
cars per train or 336 eighteen-wheel commercial vehicles per
day. Currently, the haul road can't withstand that type of
activity. Further, it is estimated that an expanded railroad
could bring a 30 percent return on investment based on one
activity alone.
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON stated that HB 271 would provide $2
million to the University of Alaska Fairbanks to perform an
economic feasibility study to substantiate these findings before
proceeding with a more costly EIS. This study would identify
whether it is feasible to extend the railroad north. Other
substantial benefits would include connecting communities,
improved delivery of goods, providing a stronger financial base
for our railroad, and providing access to additional mineral
deposits. Rail would increase the viability of development and
lower operational costs while providing greater safety in
transporting materials. The UAF is best suited to conduct the
study due to its world class researchers, who excel in a number
of pertinent disciplines. Additionally, the UAF has the ability
to build on current and previous research and to provide the
commissioned information economically and quickly. He asked
members for their support.
1:16:28 PM
DANIEL M. WHITE, Ph.D., Associate Vice-Chancellor for Research,
University of Alaska Fairbanks; Director, Institute of Northern
Engineering, stated that he has served as an administrator at
the UAF since 1995. He asked to testify in support of HB 271.
He said that compared to other states in the U.S., Alaska's
infrastructure is very underdeveloped. Infrastructure leads to
access, which leads to economic development. Oil and gas and
mining development represent a global market. Companies base
their decisions on costs in Alaska and costs often hinge on the
ability to move goods to market. He emphasized that the North
Slope, in particular, faces high transportation costs and higher
capital and operating costs than other areas in Alaska and the
U.S. Additionally, moving oil, natural gas and minerals and
other materials to Alaska, including concrete, steel, food, and
people make North Slope development expensive. Construction
costs and operating costs factor for the North Slope are three
to five times higher than the national average, he stated.
DR. WHITE said that according to the aforementioned study by
Paul Metz, Professor, Geological Engineering, UAF, developing a
railroad system between the North Slope and major access points
would allow for new project development and lower project
development costs, which would make a variety of new projects
more viable. The cost of rail freight in shale oil development
alone would be roughly one-tenth the cost of trucking.
Additionally, northern mineral development would also benefit
since trucking costs are estimated to be 36 percent of mineral
concentrate values when considering moving freight from the
Ambler Mining District to Port MacKenzie. However, by rail the
cost would be reduced to approximately 12 percent of the
concentrate value at the mine, which is three times less cost.
Dr. Metz provided the economics for a number of projects. He
emphasized that the railroad would carry large amounts of bulk
freight and lowering the cost of production could make the state
and North Slope development competitive with other producers in
the industry. This will allow the state to achieve an
appreciable return on investment from shale royalties alone. He
offered his belief that UAF is the best place to conduct the
research for the feasibility of building a railroad between
Fairbanks and Deadhorse since researchers at the Alaska
University Transportation Center have a long history of working
with DOT&PF, the oil and gas industry, and the broader
transportation industry across the nation.
1:20:14 PM
DR. WHITE said that the studies the Institute of Northern
Engineering has been involved in include the Alaska/Canada Rail
Link Project, the Port MacKenzie Rail Link Project, and the
proposed rail connection through Alaska, Yukon, and Northern BC.
The Water and Environmental Research Center has conducted
transportation research for a variety of roads in the Roads to
Resources programs (R2R), including the Ambler road project, the
road to Umiat, the North Slope Foothills road, the Bullen road,
and ice roads across the oil field exploration areas. The
Institute of Northern Engineering's Water Center has developed
logistics planning tools for North Slope ice road construction,
operations and maintenance. The Alaska Center for Energy and
Power (ACEP) has conducted economic feasibility studies on
energy for nearly all communities in the state. The UAF can
draw on a wide range of technical specialists, including
researchers in geology, economics, engineering, and social
science. Anthony Scott, one of the state's leading resource
economists, was recently hired by the university to work with
ACEP. Mr. Scott previously worked for the Division of Oil &
Gas. He lauded Dr. Paul Metz as the leading geological
engineering researcher in mineral development and freight
logistics. He noted that all of the previous rail studies have
taken advantage of Dr. Metz's expertise. The UAF has the
knowledge and the resources to undertake a feasibility study
such as this under the timelines anticipated to further develop
the economic prosperity of Alaska and lower the cost of
production on the North Slope. He said that improving the
ability to move bulk materials across Alaska will increase the
viability of new projects, particularly in mining and those of
the small oil producers. He concluded that HB 271 is not just a
feasibility study, but represents an investment in the economic
development of Alaska.
1:22:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN asked how much difficulty it would to be for
the railroad to traverse the Brooks Range at Atigun Pass. He
understood this is part of the feasibility study but asked for
general comments.
DR. WHITE responded that the goal of the feasibility study is to
look at the economics, land ownership, right-of-way issues,
grade, and access points. Certainly, railroads across the
western U.S. cross similar boundaries, thus, he believed that
the railroads have experience in this area.
1:23:49 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON asked for the timeline and proposed completion
date of the proposed rail extension.
DR. WHITE answered that he didn't know, but the timeline would
be addressed in the feasibility study. He remarked that some
delayed projects in Alaska have been due to permit and land
access issues rather than construction issues.
1:24:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON, in response to earlier questions,
responded that some of the information in in the data banks. He
referred to a study in members' packets entitled, "Alaska
Transportation Corridor Study, March 1972." He indicated the
transportation corridor hasn't changed much since this study was
conducted and much of the source information is available. He
explained the requested funding in HB 271 will be for compiling
information, examining it from modern standpoint, and ensuring
the ability to make a business case by taking into consideration
studies and facts.
1:25:47 PM
CLARK HOPP, Vice-President, Engineering, Alaska Railroad
Corporation (ARRC), in response to Chair P. Wilson, said he was
unsure of the timeline. He indicated the ARRC has had some
experience with the Northern Rail Extension project and the Port
MacKenzie project. The permitting and environmental process
ranged from two to four years for permitting and environmental.
Since this project is an even larger project, he estimated that
it would probably be "north" of that timeline.
1:27:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON pointed out that AIDEA has built other
roads and that it is not likely that the road will be built with
general funds. The project would likely be built using revenue
bonds or private investment, although the funding sources would
be identified in the feasibility report.
[HB 271 was held over].
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB260 sponsor statement.pdf |
HTRA 2/6/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 260 |
| CSHB 260 ver o.pdf |
HTRA 2/6/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 260 |
| Sectional on CSHB260.pdf |
HTRA 2/6/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 260 |
| HB260-DOT-MSCVE-1-31-14.pdf |
HTRA 2/6/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 260 |
| HB0260A.pdf |
HTRA 2/6/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 260 |
| HB 260 Wandler - letter of support.pdf |
HTRA 2/6/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 260 |
| HB 271 RR - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HTRA 2/6/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB0271A.pdf |
HTRA 2/6/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| Economic Impact of a North Slope Rail Extension.pdf |
HTRA 2/6/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB271_Transportation Corridor Study 1972.pdf |
HTRA 2/6/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |