Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 17
02/21/2012 01:00 PM House TRANSPORTATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB271 | |
| HB258 | |
| HB270 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 271 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 258 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 270 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 271-COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE REQUIREMENTS
1:09:02 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 271, "An Act relating to the state highway
system and commercial motor vehicle requirements."
1:09:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WES KELLER, Alaska State Legislature, stated that
HB 271 will expand the gross vehicle rate (GVR) weight rating
from 10,000 to 14,000 pounds to allow newer pickups to operate
without being considered commercial vehicles. As an aside, he
mentioned he holds a commercial vehicle license. He pointed out
that newer pickups and the GVR is over the 10,000 pound limit
for noncommercial vehicles. He related that the Alaska Trucking
Association (ATA) suggested these changes and the bill received
favorable comments thus far. He has also worked with the
Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (DOT&PF) on the
matter.
1:11:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE Munoz moved the proposed Committee Substitute
(CS) for HB 271, labeled 27-LS1158\I, Martin, 2/10/12, as the
work draft. There being no objection, Version I was before the
committee.
1:11:35 PM
JIM POUND, Staff, Representative Wes Keller, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Keller, stated that the
current law was written in 1999 at a time when pickup trucks
were smaller. He related that some pickup trucks are used as
pilot trucks and this bill would allow them to include a "one-
ton dually," which a vehicle with an extra set of rear tires, in
a noncommercial status. These dual-wheel vehicles put more tire
on the road to spread out the weight so there is less wear and
tear on the roads. He admitted while is not an expert on
trucking that several testifiers are present to answer
questions.
1:12:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked him to address any cost savings.
MR. POUND deferred to the DOT&PF to address any cost savings.
He reported that many individuals driving pilot cars are under
18 years of age and are not eligible for commercial drivers'
licenses. This bill would allow them to drive one-ton vehicles
while still working towards their commercial vehicle
certification. He suggested that sometimes workers on
construction sites are asked to run errands such as to pick up
something at a lumber yard and this will allow them to do so.
1:14:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE asked for clarification on the changes
contained in Version I.
MR. POUND answered the primary change made was to remove
language that pertained to federal hazardous materials that the
state must comply with [under the Hazardous Materials
Transportation Act (HMTA)], often referred to as HAZMAT.
1:14:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE related his understanding one reason the
HAZMAT placards are placed on vehicles is to notify first
responders of the impending issue of hazardous materials. He
asked for any compelling reason to remove this requirement.
MR. POUND answered that the placards are federally managed but
are state inspected.
1:15:29 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE referred to page 2, which read, "(A) used
to transport passengers or property for intrastate commercial
purposes;" which relates to commercial vehicles. He asked how
this language would apply to interstate commercial purposes and
whether this vehicle would be considered a commercial vehicle.
MR. POUND offered his belief that it would not be considered a
commercial vehicle if the vehicle is under 14,000 pounds. He
suggested the same rules would apply to any vehicle under 14,000
pounds GVW.
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE asked for an explanation of adding the
phrase. He referred back to page 3, line 1, to the language
that increases the weight from 10,000 to 14,000 pounds.
DAN BREEDEN, Director, Division of Measurement Standards &
Commercial Vehicle Enforcement, Department of Transportation &
Public Facilities (DOT&PF), responded that the bill would
deregulate the operations in intrastate commerce under those
specific rules. He said that all federal rules would apply as
usual to any interstate commerce.
1:17:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE related his understanding that the intent
of HB 271 is to allow F-350 trucks normally driven as personal
vehicles to be used on construction sites. He questioned
whether that goal can be accomplished simply by changing the
weight requirements. He further questioned whether a vehicle
would be considered a private noncommercial vehicle based solely
on the vehicle weight falling below 14,000 pounds.
MR. BREEDEN answered that the minimum weight is being raised
from 10,000 to 14,000 pounds for intrastate commerce to
accommodate and not regulate those vehicles. The division has
previously treated commercial vehicles the same whether they
were used for interstate or intrastate purposes. He explained
that currently drivers under 18 years of age are not allowed to
operate commercial vehicles. He added that other requirements,
such as rules associated with hours of service would also apply;
however, it would be unacceptable to regulate interstate
commerce due to the federal requirements. He characterized the
federal regulations as being overreaching ones.
1:18:37 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON paraphrased that in Alaska the state would raise
the standard for younger drivers and allows them to use vehicles
that weigh more than 10,000 pounds, but limited to 14,000 pounds
or less; however, federal rules would continue to apply for
interstate use.
MR. BREEDEN concurred.
1:19:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE inquired as to whether HAZMAT rules would
apply to commercial vehicles used in intrastate commerce.
MR. BREEDEN answered absolutely yes. The HAZMAT rules would
apply to any HAZMAT transport regardless of the size or weight
of the vehicle. He stated that the federal interstate rules
would also apply since HAZMAT is a federal program. He
explained that the DOT&PF adopts and enforces the federal law.
He reiterated that the federal law applies with respect to
HAZMAT.
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE referred to page 2, line 9, and also to
page 3, lines 4-7 of the bill. He questioned the reason to
include this specific language in statute.
MR. BREEDEN responded that the language is redundant. The rule
applies without this added statutory language so the language
was removed for clarity.
1:20:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN recalled earlier testimony that people
under the ages of 18 were driving pilot cars. He said based on
his experience of having hired numerous drivers in his business
career that the first requirement is drivers must be 18 years or
older in order to obtain insurance coverage. He questioned the
safety factors of using drivers under the age of 18 to operate
pilot vehicles, assuming the vehicles following the pilot
vehicle are carrying extremely large loads and are ones that
will require oversize permits.
MR. POUND was aware some drivers under the age 18 hold a
commercial driver's license (CDL) and operate pilot vehicles.
He offered his belief that the CDL requirement "kicks in" at
10,000 pounds. He suggested it was possible for someone to
drive a pilot vehicle, but not obtain a CDL to drive a truck.
1:22:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN recalled earlier testimony with respect
to less road wear by trucks. He was unsure of the context.
MR. POUND clarified that he was referring to dual-wheel trucks
and not the smaller F-110 trucks.
1:22:58 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE referred to Section 3 and to the
definition. He expressed concern that this language would
remove the authority of the state to inspect vehicles under this
section involved in interstate commerce.
MR. BREEDEN responded that the interstate regulations are
adopted in 17 AAC, Chapter 25. He explained that the DOT&PF
adopts these federal regulations by reference so all the rules
would apply, but this section would eliminate the state's
oversight of intrastate operations for vehicles weighing less
than 14,000 pounds.
1:24:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE asked whether this section would only apply
to Title 19, but would not apply to Title 17.
MR. BREEDEN asked for clarification on the question.
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE referred to page 2, beginning on line 24,
and asked whether the state has the authority to inspect
interstate commerce other than in Title 19.
MR. BREEDEN answered yes. He referred to the Alaska
Administrative Code (AAC) Title 17, which adopts the interstate
requirements under 49 CFR 300-399, almost entirely.
1:25:03 PM
AVES THOMPSON, Executive Director, Alaska Trucking Association
(ATA), Inc., stated the ATA is a statewide organization that
represents the interests of nearly 200 member companies from
Barrow to Ketchikan. He related that freight movement
represents a large segment of the state's economy and affects
everyone each and every day. He said, "The simple truth is that
if you got it, a truck brought it." He also said that as
vehicles have gotten larger they now fall under the current
definition of intrastate commercial motor vehicles, which have
historically not been considered commercial vehicles, such as
pickup trucks, small step vans, and small trailers. Version I
would change the definition of intrastate commercial vehicles to
those vehicles under 14,000 pounds to reduce the regulation.
This bill is aimed at small contractors, such as small delivery
vehicles, vans, small step vans, and trailers. He related one
of the ATA's legislative priorities is to change the definition
of intrastate commercial vehicle to reduce the regulatory burden
on small business. He elaborated that for purposes of
commercial vehicle regulation and inspection Version I would
raise the weight threshold on intrastate commercial vehicles
from 10,000 to 14,000 pounds GVW rating for inspection and
safety regulation purposes.
MR. THOMPSON said HB 271 would affect small contractors, such as
lawn care workers, carpenters, plumbing and heating
professionals, small delivery vehicles, and pilot cars who use
those types of vehicles. Pickup trucks and small step-vans are
getting larger and heavier and have been exceeding the current
10,000 pounds GVW rating and by definition are designated as
commercial vehicles for safety and inspection purposes. Pilot
cars are vehicles that accompany oversize load to serve as an
extension of the warning system for oversize loads. Their work
is almost always designated as intrastate commerce and would
fall under the bill. He related that the "bump" over the 10,000
mark requires drivers to obtain medical certification, complete
daily vehicle inspection reports, perform annual inspections,
and submit several other items to DOT&PF for compliance.
Additionally, vehicles over the 10,000 pound threshold are also
subject to federal regulations adopted into the DOT&PF's Alaska
Administrative Code. This bill would exclude commercial
vehicles no more than 14,000 pounds GVW rating from unnecessary
regulation. This bill would not change the commercial status of
intrastate vehicles for the purposes of registration with the
Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV). Further, this bill has no
fiscal impact on the state. He emphasized that these vehicles
do not need this level of scrutiny since they typically operate
in a limited geographical area and are not subject to the wear
and tear that other larger commercial vehicles experience. He
urged members to act favorably on this bill.
1:28:43 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON asked him to elaborate on any costs associated
with the DOT&PF's requirements.
MR. THOMPSON acknowledged that some costs are associated with
acquiring forms, but not for registering with the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT) to obtain a DOT number.
Additionally, other regulations require annual reporting on the
number of vehicles, drivers, and insurance updates. These
inspections can be time-consuming, taking anywhere from 5 to 15
minutes each day to inspect a vehicle, prepare and submit the
necessary reports to the dispatcher or management of the
company. Those forms must be held and are subject to audits.
Further, annual medical certifications are also required. Each
of these requirements has associated costs. The ATA finds these
requirements unnecessary regulation and this bill will lighten
the burden on small businesses and pilot car operators.
1:30:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN asked when a commercial vehicle is
required to submit to weight scales.
MR. THOMPSON answered that currently commercial vehicles
weighing 10,000 pounds must submit to weigh scales. He stated
that under this bill a 14,000 pound noncommercial vehicle would
not be required to stop at a weigh station.
1:31:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT noted that having a lower weight limit for
noncommercial vehicles will affect a significant number of
people, including independent delivery drivers. He emphasized
that it is time consuming for these vehicles to submit to weigh
stations. He related a scenario in which a small delivery van
may be subjected to a 5-45 minute delay in order to stop at a
weigh station. Additionally, some employees of smaller
companies may only be employed for six months, but must submit
to the requirements for commercial vehicle drivers. He offered
his belief that this bill will help small business owners and
independent operators who should not be subjected to the added
requirements. He suggested improved technology of the vehicles
and what they can withstand has also increased.
1:32:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said this is a good bill and he is a
cosponsor of the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN asked for DOT&PF's position on the bill.
MR. BREEDEN responded that the DOT&PF is very much in favor of
the bill as written.
1:33:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG referred to the bill title, which
relates to the state highway system. He suggested the committee
may wish to tighten the title. He asked whether the sponsor
would agree to an amendment.
MR. POUND answered that the sponsor would have no problem
tightening the title.
1:35:33 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON, after first determining no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 271.
1:35:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG made a motion to adopt a Conceptual
Amendment 1, to narrow the title as narrowly as possible.
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ suggested adding language to the existing
title, "and the weight threshold limits for commercial motor
vehicles."
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG related that the specific language
would suffice for the second half of the title, but he remained
concerned that the first half of the title is broad enough to
allow activities such as naming bridges, which he found as
acceptable language. He asked the committee to allow the bill
drafters to develop language to tighten the title.
There being no objection, Conceptual Amendment 1 was adopted.
1:37:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ moved to report the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 271, Version 27-LS1158\I, Martin,
2/10/12, as amended, out of committee with individual
recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being
no objection, CSHB 271(TRA) was reported from the House
Transportation Standing Committee.
1:37:49 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 1:37 p.m. to 1:39 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| CSHB 271 draft.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Fed Standard CMV.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 SPONSOR.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Vehicle classes.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB0271A.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB271-DOA-DMV-2-17-12.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB0270A.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 270 |
| HB 270- Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 270 |
| HB 270- Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 270 |
| HB 270 Changes in Airport Passenger Screening.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 270 |
| HB 258 vB.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/1/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |
| HB 258 INE study.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/1/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |
| HB258-DEC-AQ-02-16-12 Naturally Occurring Asbestos Fiscal Notes.msg |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/1/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |
| HB258-DHSS-EPI-02-17-12.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/1/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |
| HB258-DOLWD-LSS-2-17-12.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/1/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |
| HB258 Sponsor Stmt.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |
| Hb 271 Ak Truck support.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 NFIB Support.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| Hb 271 Norcom Operations.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB271 AGC Letter.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 258 CS Sectional Ver E.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |
| HB 258 CS Sectional Ver E.pdf |
HTRA 2/21/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 258 |