Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120
03/17/2022 03:00 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s):|| Department of Administration, Commissioner|| Confirmation Hearing(s): | |
| SB7|| HB255 | |
| HB271 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 396 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | SB 7 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 255 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 271 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 271-AIDEA: MEMBERSHIP; RESPONSIBILITIES
3:54:57 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the final order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 271, "An Act relating to the Alaska
Industrial Development and Export Authority; and providing for
an effective date."
3:55:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON, Alaska State Legislature, prime
sponsor, introduced HB 271. He paraphrased the sponsor
statement [included in the committee packet], which read in its
entirety as follows [original punctuation provided]:
HB 271 aims to improve upon the governance structures
of the Alaska Industrial Development and Export
Authority (AIDEA) and provides legal mechanisms for
additional transparency and oversight of this public
corporation.
Currently, AIDEA is under considerable scrutiny from
the public and the media. Concerns have been raised
about the integrity of decision-making processes used
by the authority and relating to personnel matters
within the authority. These concerns have been
aggravated by extensive use of executive sessions
during AIDEA board meetings, limited public engagement
on major development projects, a perceived lack of
responsiveness to public comments and little
transparency in AIDEA's business agreements.
First established in 1967, AIDEA has a long and
complex history. Over the years, the role AIDEA plays
in the economy of the state has shifted and its
financing programs have expanded markedly. AS 44.88,
the chapter of statute governing the authority, is a
hodgepodge of various funds, programs, and legal
requirements. There is little in statute to ensure
that AIDEA acts in the best interest of the public and
state economy when financing projects and little
required scrutiny. HB 271 would address these issues
by restructuring the AIDEA Board to be more diverse
and less susceptible to political whims of any given
administration. It would also create a uniform set of
processes for approval of projects requiring $10
million in financing (or more) and would require the
authority to be forthright with the public about
business dealings and contracts.
Additionally, under the framework created by HB 271,
AIDEA would systematically analyze the impacts of
projects at all stages of development and outcomes
after completion to ensure that AIDEA is in fact
achieving the statutory directives of promoting
balanced growth of the economy, creating stable
employment opportunities in the state, and providing
state businesses with adequate financial and technical
assistance.
The need for AIDEA reform has been discussed
perennially and this reform is timely. HB 271 provides
the necessary framework for AIDEA to become a
transparent and trusted development finance
organization, work
4:05:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE thanked the bill sponsor for calling
attention to this issue of transparency and the Alaska
Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA's) tendency
to call sporadic executive sessions for lengthy amounts of time.
She asked how the bill would address that concern and provide
better interface with the public.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON said Representative Vance had
highlighted one issue in the bill that needed further
development. He opined that there were times when executive
session makes sense, such as litigation; however, AIDEA {"the
authority") was in executive session "all the time." He
welcomed a friendly amendment on the matter.
4:07:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN observed that Section 6 updated the 15-
day requirement for notice of proposed action. He suggested
that notice should be posted on AIDEA's website and asked
whether that would be considered a friendly amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON said, "Definitely."
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN inquired about the legal implications of
removing the language "at the pleasure of the governor" [on page
1, line 14].
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON explained that his intention was to
depoliticize the provision, which dealt with public membership
of the authority. He added, "The part that our attorneys
would want to offer you advice on is less that concern than the
confirmation issue."
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked the bill sponsor to speak to the
"confirmation issue."
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON stated that AIDEA was not a regular
government department; therefore, the governor's absolute
appointing authority was in question.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN turned attention to Section 6, which
changed the allotted time for public testimony from "a total
period of at least one hour" to "not less than two minutes". He
asked whether that provision had been abused by AIDEA in the
past. Additionally, he asked whether the new language could
unintentionally limit public testimony.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON recounted receiving many complaints
from members of the public regarding AIDEA's long executive
sessions, insufficient notice, and the inability to participate
from 2019-2021.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN expressed concern that the written
responses to public comment may necessitate a substantial amount
of additional work for the authority. He asked whether the bill
sponsor's intent was for AIDEA to send a general response.
Further, he expressed his hope that the authority would not be
required to respond to each individual comment if there were
thousands.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON directed attention to the language in
question on page 3, line 7, and acknowledged that it could use
some editing.
4:16:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked whether it was customary to delineate
a time limit on public testimony in statute.
4:17:34 PM
ELISE SORUM-BIRK, Staff, Representative Andy Josephson, Alaska
State Legislature, pointed out that the existing AIDEA statute
laid out a one-hour minimum for public testimony. In changing
that language, she said the bill sponsor's intent was to ensure
that every member of the public was heard.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE suggested that AIDEA should be required to
post public notice of the start time for public testimony so
that members of the public weren't missing their chance to call
in.
MS. SORUM-BIRK reiterated that the bill was a starting point.
4:20:03 PM
MS. SORUM-BIRK introduced the PowerPoint presentation, titled
"HB 271; AIDEA Reform and Transparency" [hard copy included in
the committee packet]. She began on slide 2, which highlighted
media headlines concerning AIDEA.
4:21:10 PM
MS. SORUM-BIRK outlined a sectional analysis of the proposed
legislation on slide 3, which read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
? Sections 1 through 3 and 13- Board confirmation and
composition.
? Section 4- Executive Director confirmation and
personnel policies.
? Sections 5 and 6- Processes for adopting regulations
and receiving public input.
? Section 7- AIDEA dividend to state.
? Sections 8 and 9- Project oversight and approval
processes.
? Section 10- Prioritization of projects based on
furthering existing state policies.
? Section 11- Development of performance metrics
related to legislative intent.
? Section 12 - Public access to AIDEA records.
? Section 14- Transitional language.
? Section 15- Effective date.
4:26:23 PM
MS. SORUM-BIRK skipped slides 4-5 and outlined transparency of
records and outcomes on slide 6, which read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
Current Law- AS 44.88.215
? HB 386 (ch 109 SLA 1998) first added the
confidentiality language to statute
? This language was further strengthened by HB 90
(ch 71 SLA 2010).
? Per legislative records- before 1998 loan applicants
had to fill out a waiver.
? Under the Alaska Public Records Act (AS 40.25)
exceptions already exist for financial information
required to be kept confidential under federal law.
4:28:34 PM
MS. SORUM-BIRK skipped slide 7 and proceeded to outline
alignment with state policies and legislative intent on slide 8,
which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
? State Energy Policy (AS 44.99.115)
? Coordinated and comprehensive approach to energy
efficiency and conservation
? Economic development through development of both
renewable and nonrenewable energy resources
? Supporting Applied Research to alternative and
emerging technologies
? State administrative centralization and coordination
with federal initiatives
? State Arctic Policy (AS 44.99.105)
? Development with lens of vibrant communities and
healthy environment
? Positive investment climate through strategic
infrastructure
? Safe and secure maritime transport
? Integration of Indigenous knowledge into
conventional research
? Legislative Intent for Creation of AIDEA
? Creation of year-round employment
? "Balanced growth of economy"
? Business benefiting through financial and technical
assistance
? Supporting/ creating exports
MS SORUM-BIRK concluded on slide 9, which questioned what
Alaskans and the legislature wanted AIDEA to be, whether it be a
development finance organization, a state funded bank, an
economic development authority for the state, an investor in
extraction industries, or a driver for green energy.
4:31:40 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the bill was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Paula Vrana Resume 2022_Redacted.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
|
| SB 7 Explanation of Changes v. A to v. B.pdf |
HJUD 4/13/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7 Sponsor Statement v. B.pdf |
HJUD 4/13/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7 Version B.PDF |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7 Supporting Document - Letters Received by 4.12.2022.pdf |
HJUD 4/13/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7-Fiscal Note 1 DPS-AST-02-27-21.PDF |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7-Fiscal Note 2 DPS-DET-02-11-22.PDF |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7 Sectional Analysis v. B.pdf |
HJUD 4/13/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7 Supporting Document - APD and California Peace Officers Association Policies and Procedures 1.26.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/13/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| HB 271 Background- 2021 AIDEA Annual Report.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Background- Catsi- Economic Development Financing- 2015.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Background- Essayad and Gordon- ISER- Evaluation of Future Purposes- 1990.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Background- Fay- History of Megaprojects- 2003.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Hearing Request 2.24.22.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Presentation 3.16.22.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Sectional Analysis 3.15.22.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Sponsor Statement 2.24.22.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Version A.PDF |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |