Legislature(2005 - 2006)SENATE FINANCE 532
05/06/2006 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB381 | |
| HB240 | |
| HB381 | |
| HB240 | |
| HB381 | |
| HB266 | |
| HB403 | |
| HB304 | |
| HB409 | |
| HB150 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 381 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 266 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 403 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 304 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 409 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 240 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 150 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 266(FIN)
"An Act relating to penalties for violation of vehicle
weight limitations; prohibiting the use of a violation of a
vehicle weight limitation for certain personal automobile
insurance actions; amending Rule 43.6, Alaska Rules of
Administration; and providing for an effective date."
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
JENNIFER BAXTER, Staff to Representative Jim Elkins, Chair,
House Transportation Committee, which sponsors this bill,
explained the bill would modify existing laws pertaining to the
penalty structure for overweight vehicle violations. These
penalties have not increased since their establishment in the
1970s.
Ms. Baxter professed current penalties do not deter commercial
shipping companies and others from violating vehicle weight
limitations. In addition, the bill would protect drivers cited
for overweight vehicle violations from insurance companies,
which might otherwise penalize those drivers' private automobile
insurance coverage. Oftentimes, drivers of commercial vehicles
have little control of the weight loaded on the commercial
vehicles they are assigned to drive. Thus, the bill would
protect drivers who are unknowingly in violation of weight
limits on the State's road system.
9:37:54 AM
Senator Dyson asked whether both the owner of an overweight
truck and its non-owner driver could be cited for an offense.
Ms. Baxter affirmed.
Senator Dyson understood therefore that the aforementioned
insurance coverage provision would serve to protect the driver
by prohibiting his or her private vehicle coverage insurer from
taking punitive action. In other words, the driver of an
overweight vehicle would not be excused from operating a safe
and legal vehicle.
Ms. Baxter stated that was correct.
9:39:06 AM
Co-Chair Wilken recognized Aves Thompson, Director, Division of
Measurement Standards & Commercial Vehicle Enforcement,
Department of Transportation and Public Facilities as being in
attendance. Mr. Thompson consistently acted in a fair and
responsible manner during the numerous occasions Co-Chair Wilken
met with him about private business matters.
Co-Chair Wilken stated that under Mr. Thompson's tenure, the
Division has used federal transportation funds to upgrade its
weights and measures equipment. Commercial trucks are no longer
required to pull into weigh stations as scales imbedded in
roadways could now transmit weight information to a scale as
trucks travel along at 55 miles per hour. The readings are
accurate and are furthering the effort to prevent overweight
vehicles from damaging State roads.
9:40:56 AM
AVES THOMPSON, Director, Division of Measurement Standards &
Commercial Vehicle Enforcement, Department of Transportation and
Public Facilities, affirmed Ms. Baxter's testimony on the bill.
The Division worked with the bill's sponsor, the Alaska Trucking
Association, the Alaska Teamsters, and numerous other entities
to develop a bill with "reasonable ground" that would recognize
the Division's role in trying to protect the State road
infrastructure and deter the operation of overweight vehicles.
This would be the first increase in associated penalties since
the early 1970s. At that time, the penalties were amongst the
highest in the nation; now they are some of the nation's lowest.
The proposed penalties "are a reasonable increase" and would
position the State at the mid-range level. The bill would
protect drivers from unfair insurance increases, would generate
a "fair increase" in penalty revenue, and would deter overweight
vehicles' operation.
9:42:46 AM
Senator Stedman communicated the ease at which a truck could
experience an overweight axel, particularly a front axel in the
case of a dump truck. Thus, he asked how such a situation would
be accommodated, specifically with the onset of imbedded scales.
In addition, he asked whether weight offenses in the range of
5,000 or 10,000 pounds were common.
Mr. Thompson stated that the Division would attempt to address
these concerns in a couple of ways. First would be the graduated
penalty structure proposed in this bill. A truck marginally
overweight would not receive a hefty fine; however a severely
overweight truck would be fined "pretty heavy". Overweight
vehicles with a "low-end" violation of between zero and 2,000
pounds overweight could avoid a citation were they able to shift
the load weight to the legal limits before leaving the weight
station. The Division provides some leeway as it does recognize
that loading trucks is not "an exact science" and "sometimes
honest mistakes are made".
Mr. Thompson stated that the imbedded scales were a work in
progress. They would assist in speeding up the flow of traffic,
and they would allow the focus to be on unsafe and illegal
trucks rather than those that are safe and legal.
9:45:06 AM
Senator Dyson appreciated the Division's "enlightened position",
as from personal experience he found that not to have been their
position in the past.
Senator Dyson ascertained that the majority of the bill
addressed penalty levels. The insurance coverage provisions must
have been included to address the insurance methodology that
counts the number of citations a driver accumulates against
their insurance record; the fact that these citations were not
traffic or safety related is not recognized. To that point, he
asked whether this issue has been a "widespread problem" in
Alaska.
Mr. Thompson responded that the Division has received reports of
this occurring. The Alaska Trucking Association could better
respond to the question.
Co-Chair Green understood that the insurance industry does not
object to the inclusion of the provision in the bill.
Mr. Thompson appreciated the Committee's efforts in regards to
the bill, as it is important to the Division.
Co-Chair Green acknowledged.
9:47:04 AM
MICHAEL BELL, Director, Alaska Trucking Association, testified
via teleconference from an offnet location in support of the
bill. The provision in the bill that would prohibit overweight
citations from affecting a driver's personal automobile
insurance is important as drivers are seldom "responsible for
loading their vehicles and have very little opportunity to
adjust a load if they are overweight on an axel or gross"
weight. Roadways would also benefit from the bill, as it would
discourage continual overweight violations. It would encourage
the proper loading of a truck before it arrived at a scale.
Senator Stedman disclosed having a commercial driver's license
(CDL).
Co-Chair Green acknowledged there being a need for such a bill.
Co-Chair Wilken moved to report the bill from Committee with
individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, CS HB 266(FIN) was REPORTED from
Committee with three previous fiscal notes: zero fiscal note #4
dated January 23, 2006 from the Department of Commerce,
Community and Economic Development; zero fiscal note #5 dated
January 20, 2006 from the Department of Transportation and
Public Facilities; and zero fiscal note #6 dated January 25,
2006 from the Department of Law.
9:49:07 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|