Legislature(2023 - 2024)GRUENBERG 120
03/13/2024 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB358 | |
| HB254 | |
| HB278 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 358 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 254 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 278 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 254-PROHIBIT PORNOGRAPHY TO MINORS
1:43:57 PM
CHAIR VANCE announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 254, "An Act relating to liability for publishing
or distributing pornography to minors on the Internet."
1:44:20 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 1:44 p.m. to 1:47 p.m.
1:47:21 PM
CHAIR VANCE passed the gavel to Representative Carpenter.
1:47:49 PM
CHAIR VANCE, prime sponsor, presented HB 254. She paraphrased
the sponsor statement [included in the committee packet], which
read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
House Bill 254 stands out as a crucial legislative
initiative, addressing the growing public health
crisis related to the influence of pornography on
minors. It serves as a proactive measure to disrupt a
tool employed by traffickers, preventing easy access
to young would-be victims through explicit content.
Recent years have witnessed an alarming exposure of
minors to pornography, facilitated by advances in
technology and the widespread availability of explicit
content on the internet. This early exposure
contributes to the hyper-sexualization of young minds,
promoting bullying in schools and setting unreasonable
self-expectations, necessitating urgent legislative
action.
House Bill 254 recognizes the disturbing connection
between pornography and exploitation. It acknowledges
that individuals involved in pornography may be
victims of exploitation, blurring the line between
consensual adult participation and sex trafficking.
Some are forced into participating against their will,
revealing a sinister aspect of the adult industry.
The bill also addresses the link between the demand
for pornography and the demand for commercial sex,
including trafficking victims. The normalization of
explicit content in society is argued to contribute to
an increased demand for sexual services, perpetuating
sex trafficking. Organized crime networks profit from
both pornography and exploitation, utilizing explicit
content as a lure to manipulate and control vulnerable
individuals.
One alarming aspect necessitating urgent legislative
intervention is the role of pornography in the tactics
employed by human traffickers. By restricting minors'
access to explicit material, House Bill 254 serves as
a crucial tool in the fight against human trafficking,
contributing to the overall well-being and safety of
the next generation.
In conclusion, passing House Bill 254 is an urgent and
necessary step in safeguarding the mental, emotional,
and physical health of our youth. It reflects a
collective responsibility to create a secure and
nurturing environment, allowing minors to develop into
healthy, well-adjusted individuals free from the
corrosive influence of explicit material.
CHAIR VANCE concluded that HB 254 would establish civil
liability for the intentional publication or distribution of
pornography without utilizing a commercially reasonable age
verification method. In short, the bill would require age
verification before accessing [pornography] websites. She said
passing HB 265 is a crucial step towards safeguarding the
mental, emotional, and physical health of [Alaska's] youth.
1:51:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER cautioned the public that the
committee's conversation may not be appropriate for all age
groups.
1:52:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY shared his understanding that although [a
similar] law passed in Texas, the courts blocked the
legislation. He cited the reason for that decision, which
quoted Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, and asked how
Alaska would maneuver [if the courts were to strike down HB
265].
1:53:25 PM
BOB BALLINGER, Staff, Representative Sarah Vance, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Vance, prime sponsor of
HB 265, pointed out that the Texas ruling was overturned, adding
that the state has a legitimate interest in protecting children
from pornography.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked how the bill would prevent the use of
virtual private networks (VPNs) to circumvent this law.
CHAIR VANCE stated that the bill would not prevent the use of
VPNs and that morality cannot be legislated.
1:55:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY shared his understanding that the third-
party commercial software would require users to upload a
government identification (ID), credit card information, or the
use of facial recognition to verify age. He expressed concern
that people who follow the law could be at risk of having their
identities compromised.
MR. BALLINGER said most of these websites require credit card
information regardless. He added that the bill specifically
prohibits websites from retaining the information used for
identity verification.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY pointed out that Pornhub is free;
furthermore, he stated that websites like X [formerly Twitter]
and Reddit contain graphic pornography. He asked how the bill
would restrict access to that.
MR. BALLINGER explained that if a platform itself is not
creating [the pornographic content] or purposefully providing
it, then it would not be held liable.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked whether the intent of the bill is to
catch "bad guys" or prevent minors from viewing [pornographic]
material.
CHAIR VANCE explained that the bill would prevent minors from
accessing pornography, and by doing so, act as another roadblock
to prevent offenders [from accessing children].
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER opened invited testimony.
2:02:43 PM
RICHARD DARR, Executive Director, National Decency Coalition,
gave invited testimony during the hearing on HB 254. He shared
a quote from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and discussed
similar legislation enacted in Louisiana, which resulted in an
80 percent decrease in access to Pornhub. In addition, he
discussed the technology used in Louisiana that required a
government ID and a biometric face scan. He stated that the
bill would implement "base level" age verification in Alaska and
could go further by empowering the enforcement arm of the state.
2:06:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER asked whether platforms, like [X] or
Instagram, could be considered publishers by engaging in in some
level of content moderation.
MR. BALLINGER directed attention to page 2, line 16, which
provided a carveout for certain Internet platforms. He
reiterated that if the platforms are not creating or
distributing the pornography, they would not be held liable.
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER asked whether pornography websites would
fall under this exemption.
MR. BALLINGER answered no.
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER said he could see the carveout applying to
Google as well and asked whether extensive content moderation
would essentially place [the content] under control of the
entity.
MR. BALLINGER remarked, "If what you're doing is providing a
platform, but you're not distributing it, you have no intent to
do it, you're not controlling it to the point where you can
police all that material, then you wouldn't be liable for it."
2:10:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH requested further explanation of the
carveout for news and journalism and asked whether this
particular provision had been raised for litigation by other
states.
CHAIR VANCE shared that her intent is not to interfere with the
free speech of journalists and to instead, target those who have
purposefully made it their business to provide pornography. She
deferred to Mr. Ballinger to speak to any litigation surrounding
this issue.
MR. BALLINGER did not know the answer.
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER asked Mr. Darr whether there would be
any legal implications for this kind of legislation.
MR. DARR said subsection (c) [on page 2, lines 8-10] features
identical language to both the Utah and Louisiana bills. He
added that the challenges brought against both the [Louisiana
and Utah] bills were dismissed.
2:13:16 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER asked which of the categories listed in
subsection (d) [on page 2, lines 16-18] would capture Instagram
or [X].
MR. BALLINGER suggested that they could be considered search
engines. He offered to follow up with the requested
information.
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER directed the question to Mr. Darr.
MR. DARR shared his understanding that they could be considered
a "provider."
2:15:57 PM
CHAIR VANCE highlighted the qualifier on page 1, line 6, which
indicated that a substantial portion of the platform's content
must be pornography to require age verification.
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER opined that the ability to carry out
significant and targeted moderation, while not moderating other
content, would establish an intent to publish.
2:18:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY referenced a Washington Examiner Article
that discusses a spike in VPN searches as pornography sites
blocked access in Virginia. He noted that per the article, the
same spike occurred in Utah before similar legislation was
passed. He asked whether the bill sponsor would advise adults
to use a VPN if they don't want to share their ID or credit
cards.
CHAIR VANCE said she would advise them not to view pornography
and would not make a recommendation on how they can skirt the
law.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked whether it is against the law to use a
VPN.
CHAIR VANCE said not to her knowledge.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY conveyed the argument that "not all
pornography is created equal." He suggested that in an attempt
to circumvent the age verification, the bill might inadvertently
lead minors to view illegal websites with worse content that may
not implement the same standards as mainstream [pornography]
websites.
CHAIR VANCE said the same argument is made for the legalization
of prostitution, adding that she highly disagreed.
2:21:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked whether the bill sponsor would outlaw
pornography if she could.
CHAIR VANCE acknowledged that pornography is protected by the
First Amendment. She added that while pornography is
inadvisable for anyone's health, she swore an oath to uphold the
constitution.
2:22:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER announced that HB 254 would be held
over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 358 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFSH 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB 358 - v.A.pdf |
HFSH 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB 358 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB 358 - Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB 358 - Alaska Broadcasters Association - Support of Policy.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB 358 - Backup Document Articles & Research.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB 254 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 254 - v.A.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 254 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 254 - Slideshow Presentation.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 254 - Letters of Support.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 254 - Top 13 Age Verification APIs in 2023.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 254 - Age Verfication Petition.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 278 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HSTA 4/23/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 278 |
| HB 278 - v.A.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HSTA 4/23/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 278 |
| HB 278 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HSTA 4/23/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 278 |
| HB 278 - Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HSTA 4/23/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 278 |
| HB 254 - Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |