Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 106
03/09/2010 08:00 AM House STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s)|| Commissioner, Department of Military & Veterans' Affairs | |
| HCR20 | |
| HB409 | |
| HB251 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 409 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 251 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HCR 20 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 251-VEHICLE LIENS/TOWING/STORAGE/TRANSPORT
9:53:43 AM
CHAIR LYNN announced that the last order of business was HOUSE
BILL NO. 251, "An Act relating to liens on vehicles; and
providing for an effective date."
The committee took an at-ease from 9:54:02 AM to 9:54:37 AM.
9:54:46 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JAY RAMRAS, Alaska State Legislature, presented
HB 251 as prime sponsor. He said the issue was brought to him
by tow truck operators in his home town. He paraphrased the
sponsor statement, which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Towing companies provide necessary service to Alaskans
through the removal of abandoned, junked, and wrecked
vehicles from public thoroughfares and private
property. Alaskan towing companies follow prescribed
laws in providing these towing services and in most
cases are acting under the authorization or direction
of public safety officers. Alaskan towing companies
should be paid for providing these services to the
public. Providing a statutory mechanism so that these
small towing businesses are first in line for payment
for delivered services will reduce business risk to
these companies. House Bill 251 changes the priority
in which payments may be made to provide for a fairer
business environment to towing companies.
House Bill 251 prioritizes a possessory lien for
services lawfully provided in conformity with AS
28.10.502, and requires towing companies to provide
timely notification. The prioritization of the
possessory lien gives first position to towing
companies for the purpose of recouping costs for
contractual vehicular towing and storage. HB 251 also
adds a layer of consumer protection by requiring a
towing company to notify the registered owner and
primary lienholder of towing and storage of a vehicle
within 7 business days from the date of service.
House Bill 251 corrects a current situation whereby
some owners and lienholders may receive services from
towing companies without paying for all or part of the
charges. Current law does not specifically state a
possessory lien has precedence over other perfected
liens on a vehicle. Nonpayment for service situations
could shift these costs to other Alaskans, raising
prices for all. In extreme cases nonpayment may induce
business hardships and cause business failure. This is
unfair to Alaska's towing companies. Reducing unfair
business risk to small companies is in the best
interest of the state.
9:56:56 AM
MARGARET RABY, Alaska Towing Association (ATA); Badger Towing,
said ATA represents towing industry members from throughout the
state. She said current statute allows towing and storage liens
to be placed against any vehicle that a towing company tows and
stores at the request of a police officer or other person. The
towing company is supposed to receive payment from the person
who has interest in the vehicle, at which point the vehicle is
released to that person. Unfortunately, she said, there is a
loophole in the statute, which says the primary lien holder
against the vehicle has priority over the towing company and can
clear collateral without paying for the services provided by the
towing company. She said towing companies work in partnership
with emergency services of Alaska. The only difference, she
said, is that towing companies expect to be paid directly, not
by taxpayers' money. Ms. Raby opined that it is not appropriate
that towing companies should absorb losses for doing services
for which the rest of emergency workers get paid. She said the
industry would like to see this situation corrected.
9:59:21 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG offered his understanding that the
problem arises because [towing companies] have only a possessory
lien; therefore, there is nothing to prevent a bank from
repossessing a vehicle and destroying the towing company's
possessory lien.
MS. RABY confirmed that is the problem.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG explained that a towing company loses
its lien once the vehicle leaves the lot. He said he is not
familiar with the language of Title 28. He asked if the towing
companies have a right to retain possession of the vehicle until
payment is made or if the proposed legislation should be crafted
so that the lien would "follow the vehicle."
MS. RABY opined that the lien should be one that follows the
vehicle. She stated, "We utilize the possessory lien ... to
make sure they get paid, and it works, except in this one
situation where a perfected lien takes priority."
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG suggested that the House Judiciary
Standing Committee can address that issue, and that the
legislature might want to consider making the lien one that
would follow the vehicle. He opined that towing companies
should be paid first.
10:01:26 AM
KEN STORLIE, Owner, Borealis Towing, said HB 251 is needed
because towing companies are not taking cars at their own
volition, but are doing so at the request of others and should
be paid. He concluded, "With this lien the way it is, they can
just come and take your car."
10:02:10 AM
MARK DAVIS, Owner, Interior Towing & Salvage, said he was one of
the people who brought this matter to the attention of the bill
sponsor. He said he sympathizes with the lien holders that
sometimes people "get these cars out there and get them into
trouble," but said towing companies, as small companies, cannot
afford to absorb many situations [in which they do not get
paid]. He stated, "There's a few of the lien people who are
actually using it to their advantage and are pretty much
basically holding us at blackmail, threatening us to go back to
check ... through their records to see if they'd ever ... lost
any other cars and hold us responsible for any and every car
they ever lost through our particular custody." He opined that
the proposed legislation would help correct that problem. He
said towing companies are not trying to steal anyone's cars but
are just trying to be paid for their services. He said he would
deeply appreciate whatever the legislature could do to help
towing companies in this regard.
10:03:08 AM
SHAWN HESS, S & S Towing & Recovery, testifying in support of HB
251. He related an incident in which he showed up on the scene
of an accident, recovered the vehicle, and took it back to his
towing yard for storage. A credit union hired an attorney and
told him he had to return the vehicle to the credit union
without being paid, at which point the credit union planned to
return the vehicle to its owner. Mr. Hess said he felt that was
unfair, and contested that in court, but lost and had to settle
with an insurance company in an attempt to be compensated for
the recovery of the vehicle.
10:04:19 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GATTO asked if the Alaska State Troopers would be
responsible for the request for towing if the towing company was
not paid by any other party.
MR. HESS answered no. He stated, "Unless you take it to their
yard, they do not pay your tow bill."
10:04:55 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GATTO asked if Mr. Hess's company benefits from
having a contract with the Alaska State Troopers by being
perhaps the only company that gets called to tow vehicles.
MR. HESS answered no. He explained that there are several
companies that are on a rotation list with the Alaska State
Troopers. Furthermore, he said a majority of the vehicles towed
by S&S Towing are left unclaimed and have to be hauled to a
landfill at a cost to the company.
10:05:27 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG requested a copy of the judge's opinion
from the aforementioned court hearing.
10:06:40 AM
CHAIR LYNN closed public testimony.
10:06:52 AM
CHAIR LYNN announced that HB 251 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Draft CSHB 409 Version E |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 409 |
| Draft CSHB 409 Version E memo |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 409 |
| 3-9-10 HB 409 Amendment Packet including CS Version E and all legal memos.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 409 |
| 01 HB 251 Version R.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 251 |
| 02 HB 251 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 251 |
| 03 HB 251 LETTER Alaska Towing Assn.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 251 |
| HB251-CED-COM-3-8-10.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 251 |
| HB251-DOT&PF-COM-3-8-10.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 251 |
| 01 HCR20.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM |
|
| 02 HCR20 SS.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HCR 20 |
| 03 DVSA Stats.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HCR 20 |
| 3-8-10 HCR 20 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HCR 20 |