Legislature(2019 - 2020)ADAMS 519
03/19/2020 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB290 | |
| HB247 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 290 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 247 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 131 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 247
"An Act relating to the fish and game fund;
establishing the sport fishing enhancement surcharge;
relating to the repeal of the sport fishing facility
surcharge; providing for an effective date by amending
the effective date of sec. 21, ch. 18, SLA 2016; and
providing for an effective date."
2:55:03 PM
Co-Chair Johnston asked the commissioner of the Department
of Fish and Game if he was presenting the bill.
DOUG VINCENT-LANG, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND
GAME (via teleconference), identified the legislation as a
priority for the Department of Fish and Game (DFG). He
introduced the bill with prepared remarks:
In 2005 the legislature approved a bond measure to
construct two sport fish hatcheries, the William Jack
Hernandez hatchery in Anchorage and the Ruth Burnett
hatchery in Fairbanks. I was part of this effort to
get this bond passed. In order to receive the bond,
the Department of Fish and Game crafted a repayment
plan that was unprecedented. A surcharge was added to
sport fishing licenses, all of which goes directly to
the repayment of the bond, less $500,000 annually for
hatchery production in Southeast Alaska. Average
collection from 2013 to 2018 was $6.4 million.
This plan has worked so well that the department is
paying this bond back five years early in calendar
year 2020. If promises made at the inception of the
bond, the surcharge would go away after the bond was
paid. The surcharge and all associated statutes are
repealed at the end of the calendar year in which the
bond is paid off. In remembering that promise, while
realizing what this funding source could do to
maintain our enhancement operations, we are proposing
a compromise and reduction to what is currently being
collected. This leaves residents with a $6 surcharge
and nonresidents contributing the lion's share, over
six times what residents contribute. This is about an
18 percent decrease.
Additionally, the department proposed to collect that
surcharge in a separate account within the fish and
game fund, be accounted for and used only in the
state's sport fish hatchery enhancement programs,
sport fish hatchery facilities, and a bit (due to the
[House] Fisheries Committee amendments) to general
sport fish programs statewide.
Upon repayment of the bond debt there was an immediate
half a million dollar funding impact to Southeast
Alaska from loss of a surcharge income, which funds
the raising and release of over 1.4 million chinook
salmon smolt at release sites targeted to benefit
sport anglers in Southeast inside waters. This was
done because at the time when the original hatchery
bond package was put together, licenses were sold in
Southeast Alaska, but we weren't contributing any
enhancement efforts to Southeast Alaska. Losing this
level of funding to support existing enhancement
activities will be detrimental to Southeast Alaska
sport anglers.
As you can see from the fact sheet in your packets,
the sport fish enhancement program released nearly 7.2
million fish into nearly 270 locations annually in
addition to the 1.4 million fish that are released
through the cooperative agreements in Southeast
Alaska. When the Ruth Burnett and William Jack
Hernandez came online, nearly $5 million of the DJ had
to be redirected in order to pay for their operations
and maintenance. Any needed repairs and maintenance to
date have come from existing operational funds and is
usually done so at the expense of other division
needs.
There are also several larger, more expensive needs
that were deferred during construction and have yet to
be addressed. As the facilities age, the maintenance
needs will grow, thus putting further undue pressure
onto existing programs, the sport fish part of the
fish and game fund, as well as the Dingle Johnson
federal matching funds. Having the ability to tap into
a source of funds to cover these needs will allow the
division to sustain existing enhanced production
without impacts elsewhere.
There is on average, $6.4 million generated revenues
from surcharge collections on sport fishing licenses.
The division currently allocates a little over
$7 million to enhancement related programs and
projects across the division, with most tied to
operations and maintenance at the two large facilities
in Fairbanks and Anchorage. Establishing this new
paired down enhancement surcharge would cover existing
cost allocated towards the enhancement program and
allow the ability to put old programs and projects
back in place. It would also address deferred
equipment and maintenance needs and assure contingency
funds are available for unseen events without having
to go to the legislature for supplemental or worse,
shut down the facilities.
Commissioner Vincent-Lang was available for any questions.
He relayed that colleagues were available to review the
sectional analysis and the fiscal note if the committee
desired.
Co-Chair Johnston requested a review of the fiscal note.
3:00:08 PM
BRIAN FRENETTE, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF SPORT FISH,
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (via teleconference), reviewed
the department's fiscal note. The expenditure section of
the note was $3,250,000. He detailed that the services line
of $989,600 covered salaries for the division's LTC
maintenance staff responsible for the daily maintenance of
the two sport fish hatchery facilities in Anchorage and
Fairbanks. The cost also included project leader and field
staff time working on the amendment piece to the bill for
fisheries management, research, and invasive species
eradication suppression efforts. The travel line included
$4,100 for minor travel associated with the fisheries
management research and invasive species eradication and
suppression efforts. The services line showed $1,129,700
for the existing surcharge funds going to Southeast Alaska,
for covering contractual agreements with private nonprofit
hatchery operators that produce king salmon to support the
region's sport fishery. The amount also covered the
contractual cost associated with major repairs and
improvements at sport fish facilities in Southeast,
Southcentral, and Interior.
Mr. Frenette moved to the commodities line at a cost of
$335,600 for day-to-day maintenance needs, parts and
supplies at the sport fish hatchery facilities as well as
supplies for supporting the fishery management research and
other field operations. The capital outlay line showed
$791,000 to cover larger equipment needing replacement and
field equipment needed for maintaining hatchery facilities
and field operations. The revenue section included
$5,120,000 based on the reduced license surcharge of $2.50
per license and using the recent five-year average of the
number of licenses sold, which given the current situation
with COVID-19, was very likely to be much less.
Representative Wool referenced information in members' bill
packets showing the surcharge had been reduced by $2.50
instead of $5.00. He asked if the amount would have been
insufficient to pay the fiscal note if the surcharge had
been reduced by $5.00.
Mr. Frenette asked Representative Wool to repeat the
question.
Representative Wool complied. He noted that one of the bill
documents specified the surcharge had been reduced by $2.50
instead of the $5.00 reduction proposed in the original
bill. He surmised that a $5.00 reduction would result in
insufficient revenue to cover the $3.2 million fiscal note.
Mr. Frenette answered that the hypothesis may be correct
when factoring in the inclusion of activities in an
amendment added by the House Fisheries Committee.
Co-Chair Johnston directed Representative Wool to the
explanation of changes for version U of the bill.
Co-Chair Johnston asked members if they needed to hear a
sectional analysis. She directed members to the analysis in
members' packets.
HB 247 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
Co-Chair Johnston reviewed the schedule for the following
morning. They were hoping to hear from people around the
state about tools available to address the economic
situation. She shared that if there was a bill from the
administration related to economic recovery, she would like
the committee to have an idea what was already in place.
She noted there were the immediate needs and the year-long
needs. She asked members to provide a list of individuals
who may add to the discussion.
3:07:22 PM
AT EASE
3:09:10 PM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Johnston set an amendment deadline on HB 247 for
the following day at noon.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 247 Explanation of Changes ver. A to U 3.19.20.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 247 |
| HB 247 Sectional Analysis - ver. U 3.19.20.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 247 |
| HB 247 Support Doc - Stocking FAQ 2.19.2 (002).pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 247 |
| HB 247 Support Doc - Surcharge Revenue Breakdown 3.4.20.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 247 |
| HB 247 Transmittal Letter ver. A 2.12.20.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 247 |
| HB 290 Sectional Analysis v. E 3.16.2020.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Sponsor Statement v. E 3.16.2020.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Supporting Document - RI Crisis Now Consultation Report 12.13.2019.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Supporting Document - Letters Received by 3.16.2020.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 290 |