Legislature(2025 - 2026)BARNES 124
01/26/2026 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation(s): the Rising Cost of Health Care | |
| HB243 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| *+ | HB 243 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 243-BARBER, HAIRDRESSER, ESTHETICS LICENSING
4:36:48 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 243, "An Act relating to the powers and duties
of the Board of Barbers and Hairdressers and the Department of
Commerce, Community, and Economic Development; and providing for
an effective date."
4:37:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ASHLEY CARRICK, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor, presented HB 243. She said that the proposed
legislation would simply codify existing practice with the Board
of Barbers and Hairdressers. She explained that currently the
board has seven members appointed by the governor and confirmed
by the legislature for four-year terms. She noted that like
some other boards and commissions, these are voluntary
positions. She said that the board is composed of one licensed
barber, two licensed hairdressers or estheticians, licensed body
piercer and tattoo artist, a licensed manicurist, one person
licensed for something else regulated by the board, and lastly
one board member from the public. She said that board members
are often working in these professions as small businesses
themselves and volunteer to be on the board.
REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK noted that the purpose of HB 243 is to
essentially prevent the possibility for licensure bottlenecking
in the state which will ensure that businesses can continue to
provide operations without hinderance. She explained that it is
currently standard practice with the board to delegate its
licensing authority to the Division of Corporations, Businesses,
and Professional Licensing. She reiterated that the proposed
legislation would "codify" this existing practice.
REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK said that the sectional analysis just
adds language that conforms to existing practice. The sectional
analysis [included in committee file], read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
Section 1: Amends AS 08.13.030(b).
Specifies the authority of the Board of Barbers and
Hairdressers to delegate licensing authority to
the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic
Development.
Section 2: Amends AS 08.13.030(c).
Specifies that the Board of Barbers and Hairdressers
may refuse to issue licenses or permits.
Section 3: Amends AS 08.13.110(d)
Conforming language relating to the changes made in
Section 1. Specifies that the Board may
authorize the issuance of licenses or permits for
schools of manicuring.
Section 4: Immediate effective date.
REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK noted that this would clarify that the
board would be able not only to issue licenses and permits but
also refuse licenses and permits. She said that this would be
added to the proposed statute to ensure that this responsibility
is part of the board's purview.
4:39:43 PM
KEVIN MCKINLEY, Chair, Board of Barbers and Hairdressers, gave
invited testimony in support of HB 243. He explained that in
addition to his role as chair of the board, he is also a
business owner of a tattoo and body piercing shop with four
locations in Alaska. He said that he has been operating his
business for 35 years.
MR. MCKINLEY said that previously the board reviewed
applications and it was later determined that there needed to be
a more efficient way of approaching applications. He said that
the Department of Law suggested that the board create a
checklist and put it into regulation, then the Division of
Corporations, Business and Professional Licensing could use it
while reviewing applications.
MR. MCKINLEY explained that recently the Department of Law came
to the board and said that it suggested that either applications
need to be reviewed by the board itself or there needs to be a
change in Alaska Statute. He noted that the board unanimously
voted to have the statute changed and felt that it would make
application processing more efficient. He said that if the bill
does not pass, then the application backlog would be
substantial. He noted that in 2025, there were 971 applications
and this would be difficult for a board of seven volunteers to
process. He reiterated that this statute would codify a current
working process with the intention that it can reduce
bottlenecks in the industry.
4:42:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER told Mr. McKinley that the desire seems
intended to sanctify an existing practice and asked whether the
practice creates any clouds on the licenses of those who were
issued licenses before the proposed legislation might take
effect.
MR. MCKINLEY responded that he was not sure that he understood
the question.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether any questions could be
raised about license validity once legislation goes into effect.
MR. MCKINLEY responded that this may be a question best
addressed by Sylvan Robb.
4:43:34 PM
SYLVAN ROBB, Director, Division of Corporations, Business and
Professional Licensing, Department of Commerce, Community, and
Economic Development responded that she did not think that any
current licenses were in jeopardy given the proposed
legislation.
4:44:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE COULOMBE said that her understanding is that the
licensing process would go through the division as opposed to
the board and asked whether this was a correct assumption.
REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK responded that it still preserves the
ability of the board to conduct licensing functions, but the
legislation permits the board to defer this responsibility to
the division.
REPRESENTATIVE COULOMBE asked whether the division would be
doing the licensing if the Board of Barbers and Hairdressers
were disbanded.
REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK responded that she was glad this question
was asked, and the Board of Barbers and Hairdressers did more
than just issue licenses. She noted that having licensed
professional seats on the board is important to navigate the
profession.
4:45:49 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS announced that HB 243 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 243 Ver A.pdf |
HL&C 1/26/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 243 |
| HB 243 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 1/26/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 243 |
| HB 243 Backup BBHD Legislative Sponsorship Request.pdf |
HL&C 1/26/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 243 |
| HB243-DCCED-CBPL-01-23-26.pdf |
HL&C 1/26/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 243 |
| HB 243 Presentation.pdf |
HL&C 1/26/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 243 |
| HB 243 Sectional Analysis Ver. A.pdf |
HL&C 1/26/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 243 |
| DOI Presentation to HL&C 1.26.26.pdf |
HL&C 1/26/2026 3:15:00 PM |
Presentation: Rising Cost of Health Care |
| DOI ACA Subsidies White Paper 1.22.26.pdf |
HL&C 1/26/2026 3:15:00 PM |
Presentation: Rising Cost of Healthcare |