Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 106
02/27/2012 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Superintendent Presentation: Nome School District | |
| HB242 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| *+ | HB 272 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 242 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 242-PUBLIC SCHOOL FUNDING: DIGITAL LEARNING
8:34:43 AM
CHAIR DICK announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 242, "An Act relating to funding for digital
learning as a component of public school funding."
8:34:55 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT moved to adopt the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 242, labeled 27-LS0845\B, Mischel,
2/22/12, as the working draft.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON objected for discussion.
8:35:19 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON explained the CS, paraphrasing from a
prepared statement, which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Two changes were made to the bill based on the
comments heard from the Committee last week when this
bill was heard.
1. Issue: No reporting or accountability for the new
funds
a. Page 2, line 17, We have added a reporting
requirement to provide insight into how the school
districts are using their digital learning funds.
2. Issue: Using the funds for professional
development
a. Page 3, line 14, e explicitly called out
professional development of teachers as a use for the
funding.
8:36:53 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON removed his objection, and without further
objection Version B was before the committee.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON requested that the required accountability
report include information noting whether technical devices are
retained at the schools for use at specified time periods, or
checked out to the students for continuous access. Research
conducted in Canby, Oregon, has reported that dramatic
scholastic improvement has been achieved when students have full
accessibility to the devices. Practice time is increased
through the availability the student experiences by having the
device checked out to them, similar to a schoolbook, he said.
8:39:02 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT moved to report CSHB 242, Version
LS0845\B, Mischel, 2/22/12, out of committee with individual
recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. Without
objection CSHB 242(EDC) was moved from the House Education
Standing Committee.
The committee took an at-ease at 8:39 a.m.
8:39:42 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON commented that the legislation is
important to facilitate change in the classroom, and thanked the
committee for the input and swift movement of the bill.
CHAIR DICK said there is a creative and inspiration aspect to
technological devices, and he said curriculum development may
well be improved by their use.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON said the cost of curriculum is reported to
be reduced through the use of technological devices. The
teaching standards remain the same, but learning styles for each
child can now be tailored in a way that heretofore would have
been costly to create and maintain. He stressed that the use of
technical devices provides a cost efficient means to create
individualized, targeted, accessible curriculum.
CHAIR DICK noted that development and engineering of games and
applications for computer devices is among the ten most desired
college careers.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 242 to CS HB 242 Differences 022412.docx |
HEDC 2/27/2012 8:00:00 AM |
HB 242 |
| CS HB242 ver B.pdf |
HEDC 2/27/2012 8:00:00 AM |
HB 242 |
| HB 242 Supporting Document TechNet 022412.doc |
HEDC 2/27/2012 8:00:00 AM |
HB 242 |
| HB242-EED-ESS-02-24-12 REVISED.pdf |
HEDC 2/27/2012 8:00:00 AM |
HB 242 |