Legislature(2013 - 2014)HOUSE FINANCE 519
02/11/2014 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB239 | |
| HB240 | |
| HB241 | |
| HB242 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 239 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 240 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 241 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 242 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 240
"An Act extending the termination date of the Board of
Chiropractic Examiners; and providing for an effective
date."
2:30:31 PM
CRYSTAL KOENEMAN, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE LORA REINBOLD,
communicated that HB 240 would extend the Board of
Chiropractic Examiners. The Division of Legislative Audit
had recommended a full eight-year extension to June 30,
2022. The division had determined that the board was
operating in the best public interest in licensing and
regulating the community.
KRIS CURTIS, AUDITOR, DIVISION OF LEGISLATIVE AUDIT noted
that the division had conducted an audit of the board to
determine whether the board was serving the public's
interest and whether the termination date should be
extended. The division had determined that the board was
serving the public's interest by effectively licensing and
regulating chiropractors. The audit had concluded that the
board monitored licensees and ensured that only qualified
individuals practice. The number of applicants had
increased by 28 percent from FY 06 through FY 12. The
division recommended the maximum eight-year extension from
June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2022.
Ms. Curtis spoke to the division's two recommendations
pertaining to the board. The first recommendation was
directed to the Division of Corporations, Business and
Professional Licensing and addressed improvements needed in
the division's case management system. The second was a
recommendation to the Office of the Governor to ensure
statutory requirements for board members were met prior to
appointment. The division had found that the public member
on the board was a licensed pharmacist who therefore had a
direct financial interest in the healthcare industry, which
was prohibited by statute. She relayed that the department
[DCCED] and the board concurred with the recommendations.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked whether the department had any
comments. He observed that the board had a surplus.
Co-Chair Stoltze CLOSED public testimony.
HB 240 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB239 Supporting Documents-Legislative Audit Recommendations.pdf |
HFIN 2/11/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 239 |
| HB239 Sponsor Statement.docx |
HFIN 2/11/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 239 |
| HB240 Sponsor Statement.docx |
HFIN 2/11/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 240 |
| HB240 Supporting Documents-Legislative Audit Recommendations.pdf |
HFIN 2/11/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 240 |
| HB241 Sponsor Statement.docx |
HFIN 2/11/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 241 |
| HB241 Supporting Documents-Legislative Audit Recommendations.pdf |
HFIN 2/11/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 241 |
| HB242 Supporting Documents-Legislative Audit Recommendations.pdf |
HFIN 2/11/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 242 |
| HB242 Sponsor Statement.docx |
HFIN 2/11/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 242 |
| DCCED CBPL Board Expenditures 2-11-14.pdf |
HFIN 2/11/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 239 HB 239 HB 240 HB 241 HB 242 HB 240 HB 241 HB 242 |