Legislature(2013 - 2014)HOUSE FINANCE 519
03/13/2014 08:30 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB239 || HB240 || HB241 || HB242 | |
| HB239 | |
| HB240 | |
| HB241 | |
| HB242 | |
| HB140 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 140 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 239 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 240 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 241 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 242 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 239
"An Act extending the termination date of the Board of
Examiners in Optometry; and providing for an effective
date."
HOUSE BILL NO. 240
"An Act extending the termination date of the Board of
Chiropractic Examiners; and providing for an effective
date."
HOUSE BILL NO. 241
"An Act extending the termination date of the Board of
Marital and Family Therapy; and providing for an
effective date."
HOUSE BILL NO. 242
"An Act extending the termination date of the State
Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Board; and
providing for an effective date."
8:37:22 AM
DANIEL GEORGE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE BILL STOLTZE, referred
to the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic
Development Professional Licensing Program's Annual Report
dated December 2013 (copy on file). He relayed that numbers
in the fiscal notes had been derived from the annual
report. He communicated that there were four replacement
fiscal notes for HB 239, HB 240, HB 241, and HB 242.
Mr. George addressed the fiscal note for HB 239. The
analysis in the first three paragraphs on page 2 remained
the same. New language had been added related to the
extension of the Board of Examiners in Optometry including
a summary of the board's FY 12 through FY 13 biennium data,
revenues, expenditures, biennium surplus/deficit, and
ending cumulative surplus/deficit. The analysis also
included a description of the FY 08 through FY 11
cumulative data and number of licensees. The format was
repeated in the fiscal notes for all four bills. He
communicated that the board's revenues in FY 12/FY 13 were
$74,540 and expenditures were $94,478. There was a biennium
deficit of $19,938 and a cumulative surplus deficit of
$44,755.
8:39:49 AM
Mr. George discussed the fiscal note for HB 240. The second
page of the note reflected the FY 12/FY 13 biennium data
for the extension of the Board of Chiropractic Examiners.
The board's data included revenues of $179,215,
expenditures of $168,800, a surplus of $10,415, and a
cumulative surplus of $80,344.
8:40:29 AM
Mr. George pointed to the fiscal note for HB 241. The
second page of the note reflected the FY 12/FY 13 biennium
data for the extension Board of Marital and Family Therapy.
The board's data included revenues of $63,165, expenditures
of $85,197, a deficit of $22,032, and a cumulative surplus
of $112,195.
8:41:11 AM
Mr. George addressed the fiscal note for HB 242. The second
page of the note reflected the FY 12/FY 13 biennium data
for the State Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy
Board. The board's data included revenues of $250,000,
expenditures of $325,365, a deficit of $75,365, and a
cumulative deficit of $55,238.
Representative Guttenberg noted that the OMB component
number [at the top right of the first page] on each of the
fiscal notes was the same. He wondered how the numbers were
determined. Mr. George deferred the question to the
department.
Co-Chair Stoltze noted that the question would be addressed
later in the meeting. He relayed his intent to address the
bills one at a time, beginning with HB 239. He added that
the bills had been previously heard and public testimony
had been taken.
HOUSE BILL NO. 239
"An Act extending the termination date of the Board of
Examiners in Optometry; and providing for an effective
date."
8:42:49 AM
REPRESENTATIVE LORA REINBOLD, SPONSOR, briefly discussed
the bill.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked about the sponsor's vision for the
legislation. Representative Reinbold wanted to keep the
examiners in optometry in business.
Representative Costello noted that the board was carrying
forward a deficit. She wondered what the legislature would
be communicating by extending a board with a deficit.
8:45:36 AM
Representative Costello reiterated her question.
Additionally, she wondered how the deficit would impact the
department's actions moving forward related to setting
board fees.
DON HABEGER, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS, BUSINESS
AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, replied that the
division recognized that some boards were in a deficit
position; the information had been communicated in a report
provided to the legislature. The department was cognizant
of the business environment and was working to make
licensing fees less onerous. Some of the programs had seen
100 percent fee increases; the increases represented a
hardship for members. The department was taking some of the
programs into compliance over a couple of cycles.
Representative Costello asked for verification that the
department planned to adjust fees if the legislation
passed. Mr. Habeger believed that the fees for the Board of
Examiners in Optometry had been adjusted 100 percent in the
last cycle to help the board catch up.
Representative Costello asked about efforts to increase
board transparency. She wondered if there was an effort to
share information pertaining to a board's fiscal status
online.
Mr. Habeger replied that the department was working to
increase transparency. He spoke to various actions the
department had taken towards the goal. He required an
executive member of the division staff to present
information to a board at every meeting; many boards met
quarterly. Additionally, the information was discussed 6
months before a board's fee adjustment time. Lastly, the
division posted the information online on a quarterly and
year-end fiscal basis; the data was available to the public
on the division's website.
8:49:02 AM
Representative Guttenberg noted that the OMB component
number on each of the fiscal notes was the same. He asked
what the number indicated. Mr. Habeger deferred the
question.
ARNOLD LIEBELT, POLICY ANALYST, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, answered that the OMB
component number referred to how the funding would flow
through the budget. The boards under discussion were all
within the same OMB component number and would be broken
out into detail within the department's budget.
Representative Guttenberg asked how the debts were handled
at the end of the fiscal year. Mr. Habeger answered that
the operating budget included specific language that
carried forward a negative and positive balance; per
statute, the division tracked and carried the balance as
well.
Representative Gara wondered how shifting to board meetings
by teleconference would impact the state. He noted that
members wanting to travel on their own could choose to do
so. He spoke to the idea as a cost savings measure. Mr.
Habeger answered that boards currently utilized
teleconferences in conjunction with in-person meetings. For
example, the medical board felt that it was necessary to
meet in urban and rural communities to ensure that it was
in touch with its constituency. The division honored the
desire of the board.
Representative Gara wondered if the division would have
power to keep fees down by asking boards to hold meetings
via teleconference. Mr. Habeger replied that he could make
the determination, but did not believe it was always wise.
8:53:21 AM
Representative Gara asked the division to maximize the use
of teleconference meetings when possible. He referred to
boards in deficit and asked if the division had the
discretion to let them catch up over a two to three year
cycle. Mr. Habeger replied in the affirmative. There were
currently several programs catching up over multiple years.
Co-Chair Stoltze remarked that members were volunteers
donating their time. He surmised that they did not enjoy
taking time away from their profession. He believed the
larger cost problem was related to investigations that may
not be as well-rounded. He believed the members were
judicious related to cost.
Representative Thompson noted that most of the boards had
the best intentions to avoid deficits; members raised their
own dues for meeting travel. He stated that most of the
deficits were caused by investigations and law suits. He
did not believe members could be told how to spend their
money.
Representative Gara agreed with statements made by Co-Chair
Stoltze and Representative Thompson related to travel. He
asked if the Department of Law (DOL) conducted the
investigations. Mr. Habeger replied that the division had
its own investigators charged with investigating business
and professional licensing. There were enforcement staff
for Title 8.
8:57:00 AM
Representative Gara pointed to costs charged to boards
resulting from investigations. He noted that DOL sometimes
billed an hourly rate that was much higher than the rate
its employees were paid. He wondered if the boards were
charged the actual cost of the investigator. Mr. Habeger
replied that the board was charged an hourly rate. The
division's investigators positively kept their time; if
they were working for several programs they kept the
information on their time sheets by the half hour as well.
He added that the investigators were only charged for the
time they worked.
Representative Gara asked if the hourly rate was an
accurate reflection of the cost of the investigator. Mr.
Habeger answered that there was no markup charged.
8:58:37 AM
Vice-Chair Neuman MOVED to REPORT HB 239 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
HB 239 was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with one new fiscal impact note from the
House Finance Committee for the Department of Commerce,
Community and Economic Development.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 140 Explanation of Changes.pdf |
HFIN 3/13/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 140 |
| HB 140 Letters of Support.pdf |
HFIN 3/13/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 140 |
| HB 140 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 3/13/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 140 |
| HB 140 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 3/13/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 140 |
| HB FN-140CS-GOV-OMB-3-10-2014.pdf |
HFIN 3/13/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 140 |
| HB 140 Administrative Orders 266.pdf |
HFIN 3/13/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 140 |
| HB 239 Prof. Lic. Programs Annual Report DCCED.pdf |
HFIN 3/13/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 239 |
| HB 239 CBPL Prof Licensing Historical Summary.pdf |
HFIN 3/13/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 239 HB 240 HB 241 HB 242 |
| HB 240 Prof. Lic. Programs Annual Report DCCED.pdf |
HFIN 3/13/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 240 |
| HB 241 Prof. Lic. Programs Annual Report DCCED.pdf |
HFIN 3/13/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 241 |
| HB 242 Prof. Lic. Programs Annual Report DCCED.pdf |
HFIN 3/13/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 242 |
| HB 75 DOR PCG Pledges vs Contributions by Year and Org.pdf |
HFIN 3/13/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 75 |