Legislature(2015 - 2016)CAPITOL 106
03/15/2016 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB260 | |
| HB262 | |
| HB344 | |
| HB234 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 344 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 260 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 234 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 237 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 262 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 234-INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR TELEMEDICINE
5:06:18 PM
CHAIR SEATON announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 234, "An Act relating to insurance coverage for
mental health benefits provided through telemedicine."
REPRESENTATIVE VAZQUEZ stated that the proposed bill was a very
short, focused bill which did not expand mandates.
ANITA HALTERMAN, Staff, Representative Liz Vazquez, Alaska State
Legislature, stated that the proposed bill was a parity bill to
level the playing field, and required the insurance industry to
reimburse for the coverage of mental health services provided
via telemedicine. She explained that there was only one insurer
in the state reimbursing for mental health through telemedicine.
She reported that Medicaid had reimbursed for mental health
services and substance abuse coverage for those Medicaid covered
individuals. She stated that the proposed bill could impact up
to 15 percent of people in Alaska, by providing the option for
them to access telemedicine and mental health services via this
means. She emphasized that it did not provide new services, as
mental health was already a coverage component of insurance. It
just required that the insurance industry allow for the
reimbursement without requiring a face to face encounter.
[HB 234 was held over.]