Legislature(2011 - 2012)BARNES 124
02/17/2012 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR29 | |
| HB229 | |
| HB276 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HJR 29 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 276 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 229 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 229-BIG GAME COMMERCIAL SERVICES BOARD
1:31:27 PM
CO-CHAIR FEIGE announced that the next order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 229, "An Act relating to activities, including
violations and penalties, under the supervision of the Big Game
Commercial Services Board." [Before the committee was the
proposed committee substitute (CS), Version I, labeled 27-
LS0764\I, Bullard, 2/13/12, adopted on 2/16/12 as the working
document.]
MICHAEL PASCHALL, Staff, Representative Eric Feige, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Feige, prime sponsor,
stated that he did not need to add anything more about the bill
unless there were questions. He offered his belief that a
committee member would be proposing an amendment.
CO-CHAIR FEIGE closed public testimony after ascertaining that
no one wished to testify.
1:33:08 PM
CO-CHAIR SEATON moved to adopt Amendment 1, labeled 27-
SL0764\I.1, Bullard, 2/16/12, which read [original punctuation
provided]:
Page 2, lines 25 - 27:
Delete "hunt is being conducted by a class-A
assistant guide or a registered guide-outfitter
employed by the contracting registered guide-
outfitter"
Insert "board adopts regulations permitting [HUNT
IS BEING CONDUCTED BY] a class-A assistant guide or a
registered guide-outfitter employed by a [THE]
contracting registered guide-outfitter to conduct a
hunt for a contracting registered guide-outfitter"
CO-CHAIR FEIGE objected for purposes of discussion.
1:33:26 PM
CO-CHAIR SEATON explained that in public testimony [on 2/15/12]
a big game services guide and a guiding organization wanted to
ensure that supervision and participation were not weakened, but
that conducting a hunt could be allowed. Amendment 1 would
allow the Big Game Commercial Services Board to pass regulations
to allow a class-A assistant guide or a registered guide-
outfitter employed by the contracting guide to conduct a hunt.
The difference between conducting a hunt was supervising a camp,
so it would not take the place of in-the-field supervision and
participating in the contracted hunt. It was requested that the
Big Game Commercial Services Board be able to pass regulations
to allow that, but not specify in statute in taking away the
authority of the board to pass those.
1:35:03 PM
CO-CHAIR SEATON stated that subsection (e) on page 2, lines 21-
27, would read as follows under the proposed amendment:
A registered guide-outfitter who contracts for a
guided hunt shall be in the field supervising and
participating in the contracted hunt and conducting
the hunt, unless the board adopts regulations
permitting a class-A assistant guide or registered
guide-outfitter employed by [a] contracting registered
guide-outfitter to conduct a hunt for a contracting
registered guide-outfitter.
CO-CHAIR SEATON reiterated that the purpose of Amendment 1 and
the legislative intent is to allow the board to pass regulations
on conducting a hunt in the field, but not exclude supervision
and participation by the registered guide-outfitter, which was
something that everyone wanted to make sure was retained to
preclude someone from being able to supervise a hunt from out of
state and not participating in the field.
1:37:04 PM
CO-CHAIR FEIGE inquired whether Amendment 1 would allow for
assistant guides to be the guide for an individual hunter. He
surmised the assistant guide had to be class-A.
CO-CHAIR SEATON confirmed that the assistant guide would have to
be a class-A assistant guide. He offered his understanding that
a fairly low qualification is required for an assistant guide.
He said the original bill specified that a class-A assistant
guide or registered guide-outfitter could be employed to conduct
the hunt. Conducting the hunt entails supervising a camp, being
the person in charge, being at least 21 years old, and having
some experience; whereas an assistant guide can be as young as
18 and have very little experience. Under the regulations, an
assistant guide must be 18 years or older and have legally
hunted for two years in the state, but specifically may not take
charge of a camp or provide guide services unless contracting
with a registered guide.
1:39:37 PM
CO-CHAIR FEIGE said he does not want to unnecessarily put anyone
out of work. He asked whether an assistant guide is what is
commonly referred to as a packer.
THOR STACEY, Alaska Professional Hunters Association (APHA),
replied that the assistant guide can accompany a hunter in the
field, but cannot conduct or supervise a camp. He offered his
understanding that it is not the intent of Amendment 1 to
infringe or restrict the abilities of an assistant guide or do
away with that license. Amendment 1 would give the Big Game
Commercial Services Board the ability to adopt meaningful
regulations on the supervision or of conducting a hunt by a
registered guide or the contracting guide. It would give the
ability to approach that relationship in regulation that the
only licenses that can supervise a camp would be a registered
guide or a class-A assistant guide employed by a registered
guide. He further understood that an assistant guide could
accompany a hunter in the field legally for paid service in the
employment of a registered guide, but could not supervise a camp
or conduct the hunt. He added that there are definitions for
supervise and conduct. He said APHA would support Amendment 1
as put forward and would especially support the language that
gives the board specific statutory power to approach supervision
in the field.
1:41:49 PM
CO-CHAIR FEIGE removed his objection to Amendment 1. There
being no further objection, Amendment 1 was adopted.
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI noted that he does not have much problem
with the bill and its language, but asked why the bill came
before this committee rather than the House Labor and Commerce
Standing Committee since it deals with occupational licensing.
CO-CHAIR FEIGE replied that the Speaker of the House assigns
where the bills go.
CO-CHAIR SEATON moved to report the proposed committee (CS) for
HB 229, version 27-LS0764\I, Bullard, 2/13/12, as amended, out
of committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying [zero] fiscal notes. There being no objection,
CSHB 229(RES) was reported from the House Resources Standing
Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB276 Potential Frontier Basins Map.pdf |
HRES 2/17/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 276 |
| HB276 Frontier Stampede DNR 2.16.12.pdf |
HRES 2/17/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 276 |
| CSHB 229 Amendment - Seaton.PDF |
HRES 2/17/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 229 |
| HJR 29 Support Letter AK Conservation Alliance.pdf |
HRES 2/17/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HJR 29 BLM Response to HRES.pdf |
HRES 2/17/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HJR29 Fiscal Note - LAA.pdf |
HRES 2/17/2012 1:00:00 PM |