Legislature(1995 - 1996)
04/20/1995 02:08 PM House HES
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 229 - PROHIBIT LOUD VEHICLE SOUND SYSTEMS Number 429 REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG, sponsor of the bill, said that noise is a form of pollution and a potential health hazard. He felt the bill should be approved based on the fact that it endeavors to alleviate that problem in one instance. CO-CHAIR BUNDE asked to speak to the bill as someone who was trained as a speech and hearing therapist. He is well aware of the damage that excessive noise can and has done to many people. He felt much noise damage is self-inflicted by young people at times. He also mentioned the psychological irritation due to excessive noise. He felt this bill was a good measure for protecting young people and protecting the sanity of the older people. CO-CHAIR TOOHEY asked about the penalties for violating the provisions of the bill, and who is going to police the provisions. REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG said the bill provides for an infraction only. It would be enforced by the state police and the law enforcement agencies of the various jurisdictions. The Anchorage Municipal Police Department has a municipal code already prohibiting this type of infraction. CO-CHAIR TOOHEY noted the sponsor statement says that the violation of this provision is an infraction not considered a criminal offense and does not add points against the person's driving record. She asked what the provision does to stop this behavior. REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG said it was a function of the state statute. The state statute stipulates that there only be a fine up to $300--that is the provision for infraction under Alaska Statute. Representative Rokeberg said the alternative would have been to create a misdemeanor offense, and Representative Rokeberg did not feel that was appropriate. Number 638 REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS said he did not have a problem with the bill, although he felt the reasons for the bill may be wrong. He has not heard any of these sound systems that are louder than most other things one runs into throughout the community. However, he thinks the issue is one of insensitivity. The excess noise is a nuisance. In addition, Representative Davis felt that those who install the systems also need to be penalized. Those who install systems, just as those who don't adequately tune up automobiles for their proper emissions, can get their licenses taken away. That is an issue that also needs to be addressed at some time. REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG ventured to say that the first amendment does not extend to installers. He did not think the amendment would be possible to extend. CO-CHAIR BUNDE said perhaps the problem would cure itself. If there was no demand, they would be no supply. REPRESENTATIVE BRICE said he has a car with a stock radio in it. He cannot tell if it is being heard outside the car or not. He asked how one would be able to tell if their sound system was "offensive." He asked if "audible" meant right next to the car, or 5 feet from the car, or 25-feet from the car. He asked for discussion on those topics. Number 817 REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG noted for the information of the committee that a review of the various statutes throughout the country and a number of states that have similar statutes have provided information that is being used by the sponsor of the bill. He is working on an appropriate amendment to overcome this grey area when the bill reaches Judiciary. Representative Rokeberg said he is attempting to gather some empirical evidence to determine between a 50 and 100 foot radius as opposed to the other measurements of sound that can be utilized. CO-CHAIR BUNDE suggested wording to the effect of "audible outside a car that causes a public disturbance." If someone is driving by 50 feet away and the ground is shaking, that is a problem. CO-CHAIR TOOHEY asked if Representative Rokeberg had considered mentioning if the window of the vehicle was open or closed. Co- Chair Toohey sometimes cranks up her stereo on the highway. She stated that this was somewhat different than those who drive through neighborhoods causing a disturbance. If the window is closed and the car is moving, the noise is not bothering her. It may be damaging the car owner's hearing, but it is not bothering her. When the windows are open, then it bothers her. Number 927 REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG said her point was well taken, and that is why the radius was being researched. Representative Rokeberg seeks to provide a standard of reasonableness. There is no intent to inhibit the utilization of any sound system. It is only when it becomes a nuisance that he seeks to curb the problem. In addition, there are certain situations in which emergency vehicles cannot be heard due to the noise from the car next to you. In certain urban areas, this can be a real problem. REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG also looks at this bill as another tool of law enforcement. The significant gang activities in Anchorage may allow the law enforcement agencies to investigate probable cause for enforcement. The main thing, however, is the noise. This is a "neighborhood friendly" bill. Representative Rokeberg assured HESS Committee members that the bill was going to be modified in the Judiciary Committee to alleviate concerns. Number 989 REPRESENTATIVE ROBINSON said she was curious. She was somewhat incredulous that there was not anything on the books regarding noise pollution. She knew of cases in which police visit houses only because children are playing their stereos or their bands too loud. Those individuals are ticketed for noise pollution. She felt the HESS Committee members and the legislature have more important things to do. REPRESENTATIVE ROBINSON did not feel the issue was in need of legislation. She felt the police, with already existing laws, could act if a problem was evident. REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG responded that Americans spend literally billions of dollars each year to try and abate noise. Noise is scientifically recognized as being a pollution problem. Then someone thinks he/she has a right to install a thousand dollar speaker system in their automobile and disturb the peace. That is not right. CO-CHAIR TOOHEY noted that Anchorage has its own ordinance. Therefore, she asked if the scope of the bill would not include Anchorage, as the state police do not cover Anchorage. Anchorage is covered by the municipal police. She asked if there are other cities within Alaska that have similar laws on their books. SHIRLEY ARMSTRONG, Legislative Assistant, Representative Rokeberg's office, said she checked with the Juneau Police Department, and Juneau does not have a vehicle noise ordinance like the city of Anchorage does. Juneau has a nuisance/disturbance noise provision. That is a misdemeanor. Therefore, the problem would have to be pretty prevalent in order for the police to intervene. CO-CHAIR TOOHEY asked if Ms. Armstrong checked with Fairbanks, and she answered no. MS. ARMSTRONG said a resident of Kotzebue called in favor of the bill. When Ms. Armstrong asked if this type of "noise pollution" was a problem in Kotzebue, the person said no, not yet. Number 1160 REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS said in discussions with contract jails, it has been discovered that city cops around the state are arresting people under state law, and it is the state's responsibility to pay for all that. Every city, except Anchorage, in the state of Alaska that has a police department and arrests people does so under state law. HB 229 creates yet another state law. Representative Davis did not have a problem with that, as what is going to have to happen is an automatic conversion to all state laws. Local municipalities are going to have to start covering the costs, and let their police make arrests. Then it would be that municipality's arrests and court costs, to a degree. REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS said the $6 million figure that is currently being paid out needs to be considered. If municipalities can handle these issues on their own, the legislature needs to make sure they have that opportunity. However, again Representative Davis said he did not have a problem with this bill as it is very inconsiderate of people to have obnoxious sound systems. REPRESENTATIVE BRICE stated for the record, "If it's too loud, you're too old." Co-Chair Bunde said "Amen." Number 1243 REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS moved HB 229 from committee with individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes. There were no objections and the bill moved.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|