Legislature(2023 - 2024)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
05/08/2024 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB88 | |
HB203 | |
HB226 | |
HB189 | |
HB233 | |
HB146 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | HB 88 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 203 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 226 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | HB 189 | TELECONFERENCED | |
* | HB 233 | ||
+ | HB 146 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 226-PHARMACIES/PHARMACISTS/BENEFITS MANAGERS 2:20:15 PM CHAIR BJORKMAN reconvened the meeting and announced the consideration of CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 226(L&C) "An Act relating to insurance; relating to pharmacy benefits managers; relating to dispensing fees; and providing for an effective date." CHAIR BJORKMAN noted that HB 226 is the companion to SB 121, which Senate Labor and Commerce Standing Committee heard numerous times, including invited and public testimony. 2:21:12 PM SARENA HACKENMILLER, Staff, Representative Jesse Sumner, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, said HB 226 would protect Alaskan patients access to the pharmacies and medications they need. She said Pharmacy Benefits Manager (PBMs) currently lack regulation and oversight, permitting exploitation of patients and providers in the state of Alaska. She explained that HB 226 would focus on protecting local pharmacies and would ensure that patients have access to affordable, convenient pharmaceutical care by regulating the harmful practices of PBMs. She said these practices have driven up drug costs and include anti-competitive tactics, prescription drug price inflation and unfair fees and restrictions imposed on pharmacy. She said HB 226 would also require transparency and reimbursement practices and would bar PBMs from practicing spread pricing. She concluded that HB 226 would support Alaskan patients, pharmacists and pharmacies. The bill would make critical changes that will lead to more affordable, accessible, and higher quality, pharmaceutical care. 2:23:00 PM CHAIR BJORKMAN solicited a motion. 2:23:06 PM SENATOR GRAY-JACKSON moved to adopt the Senate committee substitute (SCS) for CSHB 226(L&C), work order 33-LS0955\H, as the working document. 2:23:18 PM CHAIR BJORKMAN objected for purposes of explanation. 2:23:33 PM MS. HACKENMILLER pointed out the changes to HB 226 were removing "fiduciary duty" and replacing it with "duty of care". She also said there were multiple places in HB 226 where "health care plan" was replaced by "health care policy" at the request of the Division of Insurance. She noted that Ms. Wing-Heier of the Division of Insurance was available to answer questions. 2:24:51 PM LORI WING-HEIER, Director, Division of Insurance, Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development (DCCED), Juneau, Alaska, said HB 226 had been hotly debated and amended in both bodies of the legislature and covers an emotional topic. She acknowledged uncertainty about the best way to address the issue and highlighted the lack of regulation for PBMs nationwide. She said there had been various state and federal attempts to regulate them without significant progress. She noted the primary concern raised is the lack of transparency in drug pricing, with no clear understanding of what consumers, insurers, or pharmacists pay. She said HB 266 tries to put safeguards around [consumers and pharmacists] and she said, in the amendments [to HB 266] all entities have been deleted except for Title 21 which applies to insured plans. She noted that approximately 15 percent of Alaskans are in an insured plan through either the individual market or the small/large group. Excluded entities include the Department of Administration, Retirement and Benefits, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plans, and Medicaid. MS. WING-HEIER said HB 266 included: • a duty of care for pharmacists toward plan sponsors, administrators, and enrollees, ensuring accountability. • the elimination of spread pricing, a practice which causes pharmacists to lose money due to fluctuating drug prices. • the elimination of "white bagging and brown bagging", which applies to sensitive medications that are usually administered through IV. She explained that patients often receive and transport these medicines themselves to reduce costs. • consumer protection measures: • ability to choose mail-order or brick-and-mortar pharmacies. • transparency in drug pricing and pharmacist payments. MS. WING-HEIER said HB 266 was the result of the combined effort of pharmacists, regulators, insurance companies, and other payors in the state. She said the desired result of HB 266 was to stabilize independent pharmacies, avoid excessive burdens on insurers due to fluctuating pharmaceutical costs and supply, and primarily to protect consumers by providing transparency around payment for drugs, how drugs are acquired, and how pharmacists are paid. She said HB 266 took a long time to develop. She said the bill was acceptable and acknowledged that none of the stakeholders would be getting everything they wanted, but all would benefit in some way. 2:28:49 PM CHAIR BJORKMAN removed his objection; found no further objection and SCS CSHB 226 was adopted as the working document. 2:29:07 PM CHAIR BJORKMAN [held HB 226 in Senate Labor and Commerce Standing Committee.]