Legislature(2015 - 2016)CAPITOL 106
01/28/2016 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB226 | |
| HB260 | |
| HB262 | |
| HB237 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 226 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 260 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 262 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| *+ | HB 237 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 226-EXTEND ALASKA COMMISSION ON AGING
3:06:32 PM
CHAIR SEATON announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 226, "An Act extending the termination date of
the Alaska Commission on Aging; and providing for an effective
date."
3:06:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE HAWKER, Alaska State Legislature, explained
that HB 226 would extend the sunset date of the Alaska
Commission on Aging. He pointed out that these board extensions
were an administerial job of the Alaska State Legislature, as it
offered an opportunity to review and examine the performance of
the board in accordance with the statutes which authorized them
and its relevance and importance to the state. The review of
the boards and commissions is performed by the state auditor and
the state audit group, which produce an audit with
recommendations. Upon completion of its recent sunset review,
April 10, 2015, the state auditors recommended extension of the
Alaska Commission on Aging for eight years, through June 30,
2024, as also requested in proposed HB 226. He stated that the
Alaska Commission on Aging was a bit different than most
commissions, as it was necessitated by the federal Older
Americans Act (OAA). He explained that to receive the federal
funding of $11 million to various programs for the benefit of
seniors, there must be a council in the state, comprised of
older individuals who are eligible to participate in OAA funded
programs. He further defined that this entity must be the
"state agency regarding aging issues and make recommendations to
our state agency that handles these programs," which was the
Department of Health and Social Services in Alaska. He pointed
out that the Commission on Aging developed the state plan for
senior services. He declared that this board "actually does
something," that it had an important mission and it developed
policy. He pointed out that the Commission was necessary in
order to continue to qualify for federal funding to senior
programs. He reported that auditors had noticed two issues that
the commission needed to rectify: better advance noticing of
meetings, of which the commission had agreed and taken steps to
rectify; and to better monitor the legislative watch list, as
there were bills listed that were not relevant. He suggested
that the commission served an important purpose, and that it
leveraged a relatively small amount of state money to bring in
more than $11 million to support programs for senior Alaskans.
3:14:00 PM
DENISE DANIELLO, Executive Director, Alaska Commission on Aging,
Division of Senior and Disabilities Services, Department of
Health and Social Services (DHSS), stated that she supported the
legislative audit to extend the termination date for the
Commission on Aging. She offered a brief overview of the work
by the commission and its role in state government. She
explained that the mission was "to ensure the dignity and
independence of all older Alaskans and to assist them to lead
useful and meaningful lives through planning, advocacy,
education, and inter agency cooperation." She declared that the
State of Alaska was unique, in comparison with other states, as
it constituted a single planning and service area for its
provision of services for seniors; whereas, other states had
numerous area agencies to administer funding, programs, and
services for seniors. In Alaska, the Department of Health and
Social Services was the sole state agency on aging, and the
responsibilities were carried out jointly by the Division of
Senior and Disabilities Services, which administered the
majority of federal and state funding for senior programs, and
the Alaska Commission on Aging, which developed the state plan
for senior services and provided advocacy, outreach, and
education, as specified under the OAA. She reiterated that
Alaska received about $11 million of federal funding annually
for senior programs and services. She noted that this was also
extended to Alaska Native Tribal providers, through the
Department of Labor & Workforce Development. She reported that
the commission had been formed in 1981, and was originally
called the Older Alaskans Commission. She relayed that the
commitment was to ensure that seniors gained access to
appropriate and quality services, and to maintain their health
and independence to allow them to remain in their own community,
living independently, for as long as possible. She stated that
this work was now more important than ever, as the senior
population continued to grow, from its current estimate of
120,444 Alaskans over 60 years of age, at a 4.2 percent annual
increase. She shared that this comprised 16 percent of the
state population, and was the fastest growing age demographic in
Alaska. She added that for the sixth consecutive year Alaska
was the state with the fastest growing senior population per
capita.
3:19:18 PM
MS. DANIELLO shared that the commission was charged with
formulating a four year comprehensive Alaska state plan for
senior services for approval by the Department of Health and
Social Services in order to satisfy the federal requirement for
all states to have a state plan when receiving funding through
the OAA. She relayed that, since FY08, the commission, working
collaboratively with many agencies as well as seniors, had
developed three state plans for senior services. The current
state plan for FY16 - FY19 included 6 goals, with 28 strategic
objectives, and 48 performance measures, as well as a formula
that directed the distribution of federal and state funding for
senior programs and services: the nutrition and transportation
support services program, and the senior in home services
program. She reported that the commission also provided the
senior snapshot published in the annual report, which is an
annual statistical analysis of senior demographics, use of
programs and services, and reports on indicators related to
senior health, senior safety, senior housing, and economic
security. The commission also provided annual budget and policy
recommendations to the Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority
concerning the needs of older Alaskans living with Alzheimer's
and related dementia. She offered a conservative estimate that
there were 6,600 Alaskans aged 65 years or older with
Alzheimer's, which did not include early onset or related
dementias. She pointed out that the commission provided
information quarterly to the Trust and collaboratively published
Alaska's roadmap to address Alzheimer's and related dementia,
which was the first state plan to address the challenges and
complexity of issues for these diseases. She noted that the
commission also made recommendations to the governor and the
legislature with respect to legislation, regulations, and
appropriations for programs and services that benefit older
Alaskans, including the Medicaid adult dental program, the
Alaska senior benefits program, and the statewide alert system
for vulnerable adults, the silver alert. She pointed out that
the commission actively encouraged public participation for
policy and budget recommendations, and conducted regular
community forums and bi-weekly statewide legislative
teleconferences for discussion on legislation relevant to
seniors.
3:24:32 PM
MS. DANIELLO reported that, in recent years, the commission had
made efforts to recognize the many issues facing Alaskan
seniors, by coordinating the power of aging symposium, and
encouraging seniors to participate in civic engagement. She
relayed that the commission had collaborated in the coordination
of the senior housing summit, and the senior fall prevention
coalition, as falls were the number one cause of hospitalization
and death for seniors aged 75 and older. She mentioned the
Healthy Body, Healthy Brain campaign, which raised awareness of
risk factors and protective factors promoting cognitive health.
The commission had called attention to the fact that seniors
were a $3 billion industry in Alaska, which did not include the
countless hours of volunteer and care giving work. She declared
that seniors appreciated the programs and services to strengthen
their health and ability to live independently in their
communities. She referenced the audit findings, which required
public online postings for all the commission board and
committee meetings, as well as review and approval of the
legislative watch list by the commission chair prior to its
distribution. She expressed the commission's approval for these
findings, noting the updated policies and procedures, and
reported that the new practices had been implemented. She
declared support for HB 226.
3:27:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked how the issue for the shortage of
affordable housing was being addressed outside urban areas.
MS. DANIELLO replied that the commission had participated in the
governor's housing summit in January, which included eight
breakout sessions, one of which was a session for senior
housing. During this session, a problem statement was defined
which declared that Alaska had a shortage of accessible,
affordable housing for people to age in place, and a list of
recommendations was provided. These recommendations included
the implementation of strategies identified in the Alaska road
map for addressing Alzheimer's disease. She expressed a desire
to read the report from this housing summit, and "a large need
to continue this conversation with these recommendations from
the senior housing breakout session to provide the platform for
continuing that discussion and further work." She expressed her
desire to create a partnership with the Alaska Housing Finance
Corporation and the Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority.
Referencing housing outside urban areas, she opined that it was
important to identify ways to improve accessibility in the home
so that people would not have to leave their homes.
3:30:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked whether the four full time employees
listed on the fiscal note were enough to do the job. She asked
if the current travel freeze would impact the commission.
MS. DANIELLO, in response to Representative Tarr, stated that
the commission budget had been reduced by $3000, mainly for
travel, so the commission will be having more meetings by audio
and video conference. She relayed that, as the commission was
required by statute to have four board meetings each year, they
would try to limit this to one face to face meeting.
3:32:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked if this would compromise the work of
the commission.
MS. DANIELLO expressed her agreement that this was a valid
concern, sharing that an on-site rural outreach commission
meeting was invaluable, but expensive.
3:34:08 PM
KRISTIN CURTIS, Legislative Auditor, Division of Legislative
Audit, Alaska State Legislature, reported that the division had
conducted a sunset review and the main points had been presented
by Representative Hawker. She stated that she was available for
questions.
3:35:08 PM
MARIE DARLIN, Coordinator, AARP Capital City Task Force,
Commission on Aging, referenced her earlier letter of support to
HB 226 from AARP to the committee [Included in members' packet].
She pointed out that over the years AARP had worked closely with
the commission on many different projects, as the two groups
were faced with many of the same issues. She stated that the
two groups had a very good working relationship. She
acknowledged that the commission had successfully addressed the
issues on the audit, and had been updated on senior housing
issues and the restructuring of fund distribution through Alaska
Housing Finance Corporation.
3:38:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked if AARP and other groups were
coordinating to consider the net impact on seniors if there were
changes, and whether the commission be involved.
MS. DARLIN replied that this was already happening, especially
for the concerns and impacts in the outlying areas.
3:41:25 PM
CHARLES MCKEE read from a letter he wrote to U.S. Representative
Paul Ryan regarding the welfare of senior citizens.
CHAIR SEATON asked that Mr. McKee focus his comments directly on
proposed HB 226 and the Alaska Commission on Aging.
3:45:07 PM
MARY SHIELDS, Chair, Alaska Commission on Aging, stated that the
senior population was the fastest growing demographic in Alaska,
while contributing about $3 billion annually to the state
economy. She relayed that the commission members were the eyes
and ears for the senior community, especially for the older,
vulnerable Alaskans. The commission brought these messages back
to the policy makers, noting that a lot of information came from
the rural outreach meetings. She pointed out that the
commission also contacted the state ombudsman to ensure any
wrongdoings directed at seniors were properly addressed. She
lauded the central positioning of the commission, and she
declared support for HB 226.
3:48:09 PM
GORDON GLASER, Alaska Commission on Aging, shared that he was
also on the board of the Anchorage Senior Activities Center. He
relayed that the commission looked at broad policy as well as
individual cases, as their mission was to determine what was
going on and what needed to be changed, then making
recommendations to the legislature, the state agencies, and the
governor. He stated support of HB 226, adding that the aging
population was a resource, with vital, active leadership and
involvement in the community.
3:50:57 PM
PETER ZUYUS directed attention to his letter in support of the
commission [Included in members' packets] and pointed out that,
although the Kenai Peninsula Borough had more than 18,000 senior
citizens, growing at 16 percent annually, it did not have any
representation on the commission. He asked that the proposed
bill contain an amendment to include a member of the Kenai
Peninsula Borough on the commission.
3:53:03 PM
DAVID LEVY, Senior Services Coordinator, Anchorage Senior
Advisory Commission, testified that the Anchorage Senior
Advisory Commission supported HB 226. He reported that the
commission looked at issues of concern for seniors in the
Anchorage area. He shared that the Anchorage Senior Advisory
Commission had worked closely with the Alaska Commission on
Aging.
3:54:45 PM
CHAIR SEATON closed public testimony.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES offered anecdotal testimony regarding the
Kodiak Senior Center, and how well all the services interact.
3:56:32 PM
CHAIR SEATON offered his comments on the Alzheimer's conference
in Anchorage, and suggested that committee members try to attend
any future meetings.
3:57:16 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER directed attention to the fiscal note,
noting that it needed a correction, as the revenues line on page
1 should reflect the $11 million dollars in federal revenue.
3:58:13 PM
CHAIR SEATON declared that HB 226 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB260 ver A.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/15/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 260 |
| HB260 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/15/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 260 |
| HB260 Sponsor statement_Governor Transmittal Letter.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/15/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 260 |
| HB260 Fiscal Note_DHSS-CCB-1-16-16.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/15/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 260 |
| HB260 Fiscal Note_DOR-PFD-01-19-2016.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/15/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 260 |
| HB262 ver A.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/15/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 262 |
| HB262 Sponsor Statement_Governor Transmittal Letter.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/15/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 262 |
| HB262 Fiscal Note_DHSS-SBPP 1-23-16.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/15/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 262 |
| HB262 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/15/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 262 |
| HB 226 ver a.PDF |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 226 |
| HB 226 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 226 |
| HB 226 Fiscal Note_DHSS-COA-1-25-16.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 226 |
| HB 226 Background_Commission fact sheet.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 226 |
| HB 226 Support Letters.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 226 |
| HB 226 Backgound_ACOA sunset audit executive summary.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 226 |
| HB 237 Background_Letter Dr Kusano_Licensing issues.pdf |
HHSS 1/28/2016 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/15/2016 3:00:00 PM |
HB 237 |