Legislature(2013 - 2014)CAPITOL 106
02/05/2014 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB245 | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s) | |
| HB220 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| *+ | HB 245 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 220 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 220-REPEAL SECONDARY SCHOOL EXIT EXAM
[Contains discussion of HB 278 and SB 111]
9:26:34 AM
CHAIR GATTIS announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 220, "An Act repealing the secondary student
competency examination and related requirements; and providing
for an effective date."
9:26:44 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PETE HIGGINS, Alaska State Legislature,
introduced HB 220, and provided a personal anecdote about his
dyslexia and the struggles he faced to attend dental school. He
said if the High School Graduation Qualifying Exam (HSGQE) had
been in existence at that time, he would not have been able to
complete high school. He suggested that there are many students
who may not be able to pass this exam, and it would be a
travesty for them to only receive a completion certificate at
the end of a twelve year school career. The HSGQE was
established due to the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), of 2001,
and since its inception has represented a cost burden to the
state as well as a barrier for students.
9:30:07 AM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX noted that tests are a matter of course
throughout life, even as professionals, and asked how he passed
his dental boards.
REPRESENTATIVE HIGGINS said the boards are designed to meet
disability needs. He explained how persons with dyslexia can be
served by not having time constraints placed on exams and by
providing a private space for the test to be taken.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX inquired whether the problem is the actual
exit exam or the method used for proctoring.
REPRESENTATIVE HIGGINS responded that the purpose of the exam
does not accomplish expectations and other exams would be more
meaningful, such as the Scholastic Achievement Test (SAT),
American College Testing (ACT), and the WorkKeys exam.
9:32:21 AM
CHAIR GATTIS interjected that, at the time the HSGQE was
established the expectation was for it to be a means to ensure
that students would be graduating with basic skills, and there
was general community support and reported that she served on
the task force which saw this exam put into place; however it is
clear that the original premise is not now being fulfilled.
9:33:09 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER stated his understanding that the exam
was not originally considered an assessment tool but rather a
guarantee of a minimum level of competency attained by high
school graduates, and was of particular interest to the business
community.
9:33:42 AM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked about the genesis of the exam.
REPRESENTATIVE HIGGINS stated his belief that NCLB was the
impetus for adopting the exam.
9:34:43 AM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD noted that the State Board of Education
unanimously supports repealing the HSGQE. Teachers in her
district have been weighing in with support and stating the time
that the exam takes, which they look forward to utilizing in a
more productive way, and noted that special needs students can
require a week of extra help in order to pass.
REPRESENTATIVE HIGGINS agreed.
9:36:05 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON stated support for HB 220 and said that
she had voted for the original implementation of HSGQE, which
she now regrets. It has been shown that student's needs are too
diverse for this test to be productive, and the ramifications of
failing can be far reaching, such as preventing young people
from enlisting in the military.
9:37:42 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON expressed support for HB 220. He said it
should not be considered only in the light of special needs
students. Other reasons include the fact that the majority of
high school students take the exam in the tenth grade. He
reported that surveys indicate how some tenth graders, once they
have shown proficiency by passing the test, respond with a lack
of interest in continuing study through twelfth grade and
graduation.
9:39:00 AM
JULIE MORRIS, Staff, Representative Pete Higgins, Alaska State
Legislature, directed attention to the negative fiscal note, and
pointed out that this is funding that could be better directed
for use elsewhere in the education budget.
9:40:31 AM
LES MORSE, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Education and
Early Development (EED), said that the State School Board and
the administration support this bill.
9:41:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON referred to Section 6 and the
implementation date of July 1 and suggested having it be enacted
sooner.
MR. MORSE said the date is important to ensure that students are
not caught in a time frame that would prove problematic.
9:43:06 AM
CHAIR GATTIS theorized that a student who has completed all
other requirements but failed to take, or pass, the HSGQE might
stall in anticipation of the requirement being repealed, and
receive a diploma, following the governor signing the new law.
MR. MORSE stated his understanding that the bill would be
effective from the time it is signed and forward. Transitional
language has been suggested for the bill to cover this scenario.
9:44:50 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER referred to AS 14.03.075(c) and
paraphrased the language, which states [original punctuation
provided]:
(c) Notwithstanding (a) of this section,
(1) a student who is a child with a disability
and who does not achieve a passing score on the
examination required under (a) of this section, with
or without accommodation, is eligible to receive a
diploma if the student successfully completes an
alternative assessment program required by the
student's individualized education program or required
in the education plan developed for the student under
29 U.S.C. 794;
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether the department retains
records as to how often an alternative method is used and
results in a diploma.
MR. MORSE responded yes, and said that the first time a student
takes the exam accommodations are made, such as having portions
of the test read aloud. Alternatives go beyond what are
considered accommodations and allow certain modifications of the
exam, such as the use of computerized spell check. He said
tracking occurs because of the approval that must be obtained
from the department, and he offered to make the information
available to the committee.
9:46:41 AM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX stated opposition to the concept of
eliminating the exit exam. However, assuming that it is
eliminated and considering the hardships that it has apparently
caused over the years, she suggested offering a retroactive date
to provide diplomas to those who may have been impinged upon by
the requirement since its inception.
MR. MORSE offered that taking such a step would require a legal
opinion and represent a legislative policy question.
9:48:17 AM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD asked whether there is any reason to
maintain the exam: does it represent something particular to
the student or perhaps a value to the business district.
MR. MORSE stated that the assessment measures basic competency
skills and has served to ramp up the curriculum to meet the
needs of every student. In that light, it has fulfilled a
purpose, but today it is no longer relevant. To a follow-up
question, he said a replacement test will come under discussion.
9:50:45 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON asked to have the administration provide
the committee with proficiency standards information to
determine the effectiveness of the HSGQE.
9:51:34 AM
CHAIR GATTIS opened public testimony.
9:51:51 AM
MIKE COONS stated support for HB 220, paraphrasing from a
prepared statement, which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
I support HB 220 as written. However, in the other
body the companion bill, SB 111 has changed with
transition language added:
TRANSITION: STUDENT TESTING IN PROGRESS. Until June
30, 2017, a school district shall continue to
administer the competency examination under former AS
14.03.075 and regulations adopted under former AS
14.03.075 in effect on August 31, 2014, to a student
who seeks to qualify for a secondary school diploma
under former AS 14.03.075, as it read on August 31,
2014.
* Sec. 7. This Act takes effect September 1, 2014.
My problem with this is, that this severely impacts
young adults from moving forward now as adults. Yes,
I realize this will be the last class to take the exit
exam, it is a logistical matter more than anything
else. I'm sure there will be those students who will
look at this as an opportunity to see how well they do
for upcoming SAT's they plan to take. There will be
others, like I was at 18 who will take it because we
know we must and what the heck see how well I do and
not be worried about it.
Then there will those who weren't going to pass the
test anyway and within that are those who have not
passed all required classes and may not get a diploma
under any circumstances. So, let this exit exam die a
quiet death with minimal impact on the students. For
to do the "transition", this then impacts those trying
to go into the military since most require a diploma
for enlistment and those students who will look at
this as just another hoop to jump through. Myself, if
I were not going into the military, I'd take the test,
if I didn't pass the math, I'd get my transcripts for
the entire High School years and submit that to any
future employer instead of a "sheep skin diploma".
I strongly believe that when I see a problem to not
only identify it, but to come up with an alternative
or fix to that problem, thus; delete the Transition
Student Testing In Progress and instead insert:
Procedures for graduation.
Sec. 14.03.075. College and career assessments. (a) A
student shall be issued a secondary school diploma
upon completing all required course study throughout
High School with a 2.0 GPA or higher. (b) A student
who fails to qualify for the issuance of a diploma
under (a) of this section will be held back so the
student can retake the needed courses to meet the 2.0
GPA requirement, upon successful completion the
diploma will be issued.
As to the SB 111, line 30; change the September 1,
2014 back to July 1, 2014.
9:55:38 AM
SALLY DYBDAHL, President, Hoonah School Board, stated support
for HB 220 and said more relevant approaches should be taken.
She noted the negative effects the exam has had on potential
Hoonah graduates.
9:56:43 AM
MARY NANUWAK, speaking for herself, stated support for education
and noted problems which exist. The state and federal laws
being discussed, she opined, sometimes create inequality. She
expressed appreciation for the committee members working on the
issues.
10:00:53 AM
ERNIE MANZIE stated support for HB 220 and said there are other
assessments which accomplish more relevant evaluations of
students for college, and industry purposes. He provided a
personal anecdote, about his son's struggles to pass the HSGQE,
to underscore his statement.
10:04:06 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether there was any value to
having his son pass the exam.
MR. MANZIE answered that there was no educational value, only
that he was then able to receive his diploma.
10:05:37 AM
CHAIR GATTIS announced HB 220 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 220 State Board Resolution.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 220 |
| HB 220 HSGQE Relevancy.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 220 |
| HB 220 HSGQE_ContractualCosts.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 220 |
| HB 220 Section Analysis.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 220 |
| HB 220 Sponsors Statement A.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 220 |
| HB 220 Statewide HSGQE Results.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 220 |
| HB220 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 220 |
| HB 245 Hearing Request.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 245 |
| HB 245 Sponsor statement.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 245 |
| HB 245 Supporting document Bockhorst.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 245 |
| HB 245 Supporting documents - analyses of legal issues.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 245 |
| HB 245 Supporting documents - local contributions - Ketchikan.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 245 |
| HB245 Fiscal Note - Comm Reg Affairs.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 245 |
| HB245 Fiscal Note Designated Reserves Endowments.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 245 |
| HB245 FiscalNote DEED.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 245 |
| Edc Confirmation - Enright resume.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
Confirmation: |
| HB220-public comment.PDF |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 220 |
| HB245 Ketchikan vs AK.pdf |
HEDC 2/5/2014 8:00:00 AM |
HB 245 |