Legislature(2013 - 2014)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/28/2014 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB47 | |
| HB218 | |
| SB201 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 47 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 218 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 201 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 218-SENTENCING;AGGRAVATOR/DEPORTATION STATUS
2:31:10 PM
CHAIR COGHILL announced the consideration of HB 218. "An Act
relating to the aggravating factor at felony sentencing of
multiple prior misdemeanors when a prior misdemeanor involves an
assault on a correctional employee; providing that deportation
is not a proper factor for referral of a case to a three-judge
panel for sentencing for a felony; and providing for an
effective date." He noted this was the second hearing and there
was an amendment for the committee to consider.
2:31:39 PM
SENATOR MCGUIRE moved to adopt Amendment 1, labeled 28-
LS0941\U.3.
CHAIR COGHILL objected for an explanation.
AMENDMENT 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE
TO: CSHB 218(JUD)
Page 6, line 18:
Delete "or that collateral consequences may or
will result if the defendant is classified as
deportable"
Page 6, line 26:
Delete "or that collateral consequences may or
will result if the defendant is classified as
deportable"
2:31:46 PM
TOM WRIGHT, Staff, Representative Mike Chenault, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, explained that Public Defender
Quinlan Steiner brought the amendment forward after the first
hearing and then worked with the Department of Law on compromise
language. The essence is that deportation will not be a
consideration in requesting a three-judge panel, whereas unduly
harsh collateral consequences may be taken into consideration
for requesting a three-judge panel.
2:33:04 PM
ANNE CARPENETI, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division,
Legal Services Section, Department of Law (DOL), Juneau, Alaska,
affirmed that DOL discussed this with the Public Defender Agency
and arrived at a fair compromise. She summarized that the fact
of being deportable is not something that can go to a three-
judge panel for sentencing, but if the defendant can establish
unduly harsh collateral consequences and the sentencing judge
finds that those claims are proved by clear and convincing
evidence, that could be considered as a basis for going to a
three-judge panel.
2:34:03 PM
QUINLAN STEINER, Public Defender, Public Defender Agency,
Department of Administration (DOA), said the intent of the
amendment is to preserve a defendant's ability to plead unduly
harsh collateral consequences that may flow from an eventual
deportation, but the defendant would not be able to plead the
fact that he/she would be deported as grounds for obtaining a
three-judge panel.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked for examples where keeping the
provision would result in one decision and removing it would
result in a different decision.
MS. CARPENETI said a person whose sentence range is high enough
to be considered deportable by immigration authorities would not
be able to argue that fact to qualify for a three-judge panel.
Whereas if the person was Syrian, for example, and could
establish by clear and convincing evidence that the effect of
being deported to Syria would result in unduly harsh collateral
consequences, that could be argued to qualify for a three-judge
panel.
MR. STEINER added that if a person was trying to plead the fact
that they'd be deported and nothing more, they wouldn't be
entitled to argue that to obtain a three-judge panel. But if the
person could plead some further consequence of the deportation
such as it would result in death, then the person could argue
that that qualifies for a three-judge panel.
SENATOR MCGUIRE stated support for the amendment because it
accommodates people seeking political asylum who might face
murder if they're deported.
CHAIR COGHILL removed his objection and Amendment 1 was adopted.
Finding no further questions or comments, he solicited a motion.
2:37:53 PM
SENATOR MCGUIRE moved to report CS for HB 218, as amended, from
committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal
note(s).
CHAIR COGHILL announced that without objection, SCS CSHB
218(JUD) passes from the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| CSSB 201.pdf |
SJUD 3/28/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 201 |
| HB 218 Amendment.PDF |
SJUD 3/28/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 218 |
| HB 47 - Written Testimony.pdf |
SJUD 3/28/2014 1:30:00 PM |
HB 47 |
| Written Testimony - SB 201.pdf |
SJUD 3/28/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 201 |