Legislature(1999 - 2000)
05/04/1999 08:45 AM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 217
"An Act relating to obligations and payments to the
state under fishery cooperative contracts; and
providing for an effective date."
TIM BENINTENDI, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE MOSES spoke in support
of HB 217. He maintained that HB 217 is needed to authorize
the Department of Revenue to collect payments in lieu of
fisheries landing taxes. "These payments were established in
the federal American Fisheries Act of 1998, and are part of
the fisheries cooperative contracts existing among those
active in the pollock fishery. The basic provision is for
payments to be made in lieu of taxes on product, which is
not landed, for processing in Alaska. The payments are
justified in that, like the landing taxes, they help
reimburse coastal communities for basic services rendered to
the offshore fleet during the fishing seasons. Because the
American Fisheries Act changed the competitive nature and
fast pace of the fishery, some boats might well find it in
their best interest to return to places like Seattle to
refuel, take on supplies, and change crews. In this event,
they would take loads of pollock with them, foregoing
landing in Alaska. Since the extent of these changes will
not be known until at least next year, we can only speculate
on the impact on the fisheries landing tax. In the support
material to the fiscal note, it is estimated that the
potential loss of landing tax revenue would be between
$256,000 to $512,000. It may likely be higher."
Mr. Benintendi stated that "HB 217 would clearly authorize
the Department of Revenue to collect these payments, and
process them as though they were regular landing taxes. It
is necessary to achieve passage of this legislation this
year in order that it be in place for next season."
BRETT FRIED, ECONOMIST, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE stated that
the Department of Revenue supports the legislation.
In response to a question by Representative J. Davies, Co-
Chair Therriault pointed out that the legislation allows the
state to collect money that it could not otherwise collect.
Vice-Chair Bunde agreed and added that it is new money that
the state was not previously able to collect under the
fisheries tax. He noted that the state has not had the
benefit of collection on resources going to Seattle.
In response to a question by Representative Kohring, Co-
Chair Therriault explained that the state charges a tax on
fish that are landing in the state of Alaska. Offshore
factory ships go to Seattle without unloading in Alaska. The
federal provision allows the current state tax to be
collected on the fish resources that are taken to Seattle.
It allows the state to collect the tax that is already in
place on the total resource that is fished in the state of
Alaska.
Co-Chair Mulder MOVED to report HB 217 out of Committee with
the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it
was so ordered.
HB 217 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with a fiscal impact note by the
Department of Revenue.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|