Legislature(2003 - 2004)
05/17/2003 11:45 AM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 215- ONE PERCENT FOR ART
BARBARA BITNEY, staff to Representative Bill Stoltze, explained
the original legislation was to repeal the one percent for art
requirement, but after working with the Alaska State Council of
the Arts the bill would:
· Apply only to state funding not federal funding
· Cap the one percent for a project at the first $10 million
and at one-half percent thereafter.
· Set aside five percent of the one percent for maintenance
· The Council would monitor and facilitate the maintenance
and restoration of existing art works.
· Strengthen the Alaska artist's preference
· Provide for reporting from state departments to the
Council
· Require the Council to report to Legislative Budget and
Audit Committee on an annual basis
SENATOR FRED DYSON asked what type of savings they anticipate.
MS. BITNEY explained that the attached report actually provides
the best information available because each agency tracks funding
differently, which makes the information difficult to piece
together.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS said he has followed the issue with interest
and would like her to expand on the changes made to the original
legislation.
MS. BITNEY said it now applies only to general fund expenditure
rather than the total construction cost. Federal funds are no
longer included.
SENATOR DYSON asked whether they addressed anomalies such as
performing arts centers where the entire building is arguably
dedicated to the arts. Would the one percent for art requirement
still apply in those instances?
MS. BITNEY replied this was a compromise since the original
legislation was to repeal the requirement altogether.
SENATOR DYSON asked about facilities that aren't readily
available to the public.
MS. BITNEY explained the one percent for art program is for
buildings that have substantial public use and the Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities make that determination.
SENATOR GUESS asked why federal funds were no longer included.
MS. BITNEY replied it reduces the required allocation. If you
were to use the Anchorage Airport as an example and consider the
federal funds that have been added over time, the art allocation
would be impossibly large.
SENATOR GUESS made a motion to move HB 215 and attached zero
fiscal note from committee with individual recommendations. There
being no objection, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|