Legislature(2025 - 2026)DAVIS 106
05/05/2025 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB39 | |
| HB176 | |
| HB212 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 39 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 176 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 212 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 212-LOCAL CONTRIBUTIONS BY SCHOOL DISTRICTS
9:07:58 AM
CO-CHAIR STORY announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 212, "An Act relating to the local
contribution made by a city or borough school district; and
providing for an effective date."
[Co-Chair Story handed the gavel to Co-Chair Himschoot].
9:09:16 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ANDI STORY, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor, presented HB 212 to the committee. She read from the
sponsor statement for HB 212 [included in the committee packet],
which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
Upon the draft recommendation of the Department of
Education and Early Development (DEED), the Alaska
State Board of Education and Early Development will
consider a regulation change to 4 AAC 09.990(b), which
will amend the definition of local contribution in
AS14.17.990. Currently under Sec.14.17.990
Definitions, (6) states, "local contribution means
appropriations and the value of inkind services made
by a district." If passed by the State Board of
Education, the draft proposal will have far-reaching
implications for school districts by limiting services
and opportunities for our youth.
The language presented to the Alaska State Board of
Education and Early Development seeks to prohibit
municipalities from making additional, voluntary
contributions to their school district for non-
instructional purposes and/or to designated non-
operating funds. Districts have long received
additional funding outside of the foundation formula
limit through the local discretionary maximum also
known as "the cap" for non-instructional expenses such
as student transportation before and after-school
programs, early childhood and pre-k education, career
and technical education, nutritional services, student
activities, and more. Additional revenues provided to
local school districts to support programs, services,
projects, and events deemed critical by the local
communities is a long-held practice.
At a time when state-wide revenues continue to be
stretched, many of our municipalities around the state
have stepped up to support their community-wide
schools beyond their required contribution mandated
under the foundation formula. One of the concerns
facing this bill is the lack of ability to raise
revenue in our school districts that are most rural. I
support equitable funding for all children, and we
must find ways to ensure equity. However, this draft
regulation will not do that. It is much more
complicated. Some Rural Education Attendance Area
schools (REAA) receive revenue which puts them in the
top 95th percentile. Prohibiting a revenue source is
not the solution to achieving equity for Alaska's
children and communities.
A school district's operating budget funds the day-to-
day instructional operations, legal obligations, and
administrative duties of providing public education.
However, a school district is much more than an
instructional institution. It is the cornerstone of a
community. This bill is about allowing local control
in a municipality to fund programs and services that
improve and preserve quality of life as needed. It is
of utmost importance that we prioritize protecting any
loss of services to children and their families
particularly in this time of budget shortfalls.
Without this bill, the funding crisis for some Alaska
school districts stand to worsen as we head into the
next few years, and so I urge your support of House
Bill 212.
9:13:35 AM
TAMMY SMITH, Staff, Representative Andi Story, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Andi Story, prime
sponsor, presented HB 212 to the committee.
Section 1.
Amends 14.17 by adding a new section Sec. 14.17.530:
Determination of local contribution made by a city or
borough school district. A local school district shall
define the terms "student transportation," "nutrition
services," "food services," "preschool, pre-
kindergarten, or other early education program,"
"career and technical education", "before-school
program," "after-school program," and "student
activity" when determining the calculation of a local
contribution.
Section 2.
Amends Sec. 2. AS 14.17.990(6) to read "local
contribution" means appropriations and the value of
in-kind services made by a district does not include
appropriations or the value of in-kind services made
by a district for student transportation, nutrition
services, food services, a preschool, pre-
kindergarten, or other early education program, career
and technical education, a before-school program, an
after-school program, or a student activity.
Section 3.
Amends AS 01.10.070(c) to provide for this Act to take
effect immediately.
9:16:18 AM
FRANK HAUSER, Superintendent, Juneau School District, gave
invited testimony on HB 212. He began his testimony by
explaining how the proposed legislation would change how local
communities within a school district would be able to fund non-
instructional items, such as extracurricular sports, activities,
community schools, after school programs, student nutrition,
student transportation, and early education programs. He
highlighted the positive impacts of allowing local school
communities within school districts to allocate funds at their
own discretion and emphasized the possible negative impacts upon
a school district were its local community not allowed to
allocate it funds. He described how a proposed regulatory
change by the DEED would threaten the very way that school
districts are currently allowed to budget by eliminating local
governments' authority to make decisions with local dollars and
non-instructional priorities. He said that the proposed
regulatory changes by the DEED would not succeed in providing
the equitable outcome that they aim to achieve and explained how
HB 212 would provide a "targeted approach" to maintain both
federal funding exceptions and a free and fair public education.
9:27:12 AM
KATIE PARROT, Senior Director, Office of Management & Budget,
Anchorage School District, gave invited testimony on HB 212.
She explained how school districts around Alaska are utilizing
local funds for their schools to offset the impacts of a flat-
funded Base Student Allocation (BSA) and an increasing cost of
operation for school districts in Alaska. She emphasized how
the proposed legislation would balance school district funding
needs by retaining the ability for local communities to fund
their local school districts at their own discretion. She
explained how the proposed regulatory change by the DEED would
result in a more unfair funding environment for Alaska's schools
and describe the positive impacts of local funding on school
districts around the state.
9:36:41 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SCHWANKE asked why the supplemental
transportation funding for the Anchorage School District (ASD)
is set to increase in the next fiscal year.
MS. PARROT answered that enrollment decline is often to blame in
the increase of a transportation route's cost. She said that the
passing of 2024 Ballot Measure 1 also has an impact on the cost
of labor.
9:39:34 AM
REPRESENTATIVE EISCHEID asked if 1600 kids would lose
transportation services if HB 212 were not to become law.
MS. PARROT explained that the 1600 figure she shared was
comprised of a multitude of different sectors of education.
9:42:16 AM
JOSH COUGHRAN, Superintendent, Skagway School District, gave
invited testimony on HB 212. He explained how the Skagway
School District (SSD) utilizes local funding to make up a
funding disparity from the state and fund programs that might
not otherwise be able to exist were local funds not available.
He explained how the limiting of special revenue funds would
negatively impact schools all over Alaska and detailed the
various school services that special revenue funds uphold in
Skagway. He urged the committee to help protect the special
revenue funding avenue that currently exists for school
districts in Alaska.
9:47:34 AM
CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT opened public testimony on HB 212.
9:48:03 AM
NILS ANDREASSEN, Executive Directo, Alaska Municipal League,
testified in support of HB 212. He emphasized the importance of
local governments being able to provide their own revenue to
their own school districts and said that HB 212 would create a
clear distinction between the state's obligation to provide a
free and fair public education and a local government's need to
tailor state funding.
9:50:32 AM
MIKE COONS, representing self, testified in opposition to HB
212. He said that the proposed legislation would push for
"equity, which is part in parcel of D-E-I.". He continued to
ask how the ASD would "it do this once the $17 million is pulled
by the U.S. Department of Education for their pushing of DEI,
CRT, and LGBCDQ. Why can't the ASD use the $80 million slush
fund that they have, BSA needs to be going to classroom and
teachers, not any and all other things that are not classroom
and teachers. So long as this legislature continues with no
real accountability, I call on the governor to veto HB 57, and
if this passes, veto this as well."
9:52:22 AM
CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT, after ascertaining that there was no one who
wished to testify, closed public testimony on HB 212.
9:52:32 AM
CO-CHAIR STORY made clear that HB 212 would concern only funding
that would be raised by local governments and had nothing to do
with the BSA.
[HB 212 was held over].
9:53:50 AM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Education Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 9:53 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 39 Version A.pdf |
HEDC 4/30/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 39 |
| CS HB 39 Version N.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Amend #1 4.30.25.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Sponsor Statement 04.10.2025.pdf |
HEDC 4/30/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Sectional Analysis 04.10.2025.pdf |
HEDC 4/30/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 FN #2796 4.25.25.pdf |
HEDC 4/30/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Article ADN_ASL Cuts in ASD Budget 2.11.25.pdf |
HEDC 4/30/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Research_AK Deaf Children Bill of Rights-AK Deaf Council & Duane Mayes1.24.25.pdf |
HEDC 4/30/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 LOS GCD&SpEd & PT.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 39 |
| HB 176 A.pdf |
HEDC 4/30/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 Sponsor Statement Version A.pdf |
HEDC 4/30/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 Sectional Analysis Version A.pdf |
HEDC 4/30/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 Fiscal Note UA #1296.pdf |
HEDC 4/30/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 ASUAF Support Resolution 2.18.2025.pdf |
HEDC 4/30/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 UAF Fee Committee Memo 6.25.24.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 UAF Fee Explanation 2025.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 GS UA Bill 2024.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 AC UA Bill 2014.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 UAF Bill Spring 2014.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 176 |
| HB 212 (34-LS0927) Version A.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/12/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 Sponsor Statement Local Contribution Version A .pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/12/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/12/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| AK Statute Amendment to Local Control.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
|
| HB 212 Fiscal Note 141.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/12/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 Fiscal Note 2804.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/12/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 Fiscal Note Mt. Edge. 1060.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/12/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212Presentation Hauser House Education Local Contribution.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/12/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212. Leg. Research Maximum Local Contributions by School Districts.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/12/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 Leg. Research Impact Aid.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/12/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 Anchorage Daily News Article.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/12/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| HB 212 AML Letter of Support, 5.5.25.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM HEDC 5/12/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 212 |
| HB 39 LOS AK Deaf Council.pdf |
HEDC 5/5/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 39 |