Legislature(2005 - 2006)
05/05/2005 04:55 PM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB61 | |
| HB149 | |
| HB169 | |
| HB211 | |
| HB225 | |
| HB123 | |
| HB215 | |
| SB46 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 211(FIN)
"An Act extending the termination date of the Board of Dental
Examiners; and relating to dentists and dental hygienists."
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
HEATH HILLIARD, Staff to Representative Mike Kelly, the bill's
sponsor, explained that, while this bill would "essentially" extend
the Board of Dental Examiners, it would impose a few changes to
existing Statutes to make them "more relevant to existing
situations". All involved entities, including the Alaska Dental
Society (ADS), the Alaska State Dental Hygiene Association (ASDHA),
and the Division of Occupational Licensing, Department of Commerce,
Community and Economic Development, have agreed to the proposed
changes. The changes would include the implementation of continuing
education requirements for Dental Hygienists, modifying the
inspection period for radiological equipment used in dentistry,
clarifying licensing qualifications regarding impairments that
might impair an applicant's ability to practice dentistry, and
clarifying the statutes for specialty licensure by requiring that
the applicant meet certain qualifications for dentists in the
State. The extension of the Board, as well as some of the changes
included in the bill, were supported in the findings of a
Legislative Audit report for Audit Control Number 08-20031-04,
[copy on file] conducted in August 2004.
Co-Chair Green noted that the Committee had recently adopted
legislation regarding foreign trained medical doctors. To that
point, she asked whether that bill would affect dentists.
Mr. Hilliard voiced being unsure of the impact of that legislation
on the dental profession. However, he noted that there such a
concern in regards to the status of one dental practitioner.
Co-Chair Green voiced that the impact of that bill on the dental
field should be established, as this could be the opportunity to
address issues that might be occurring in regards to foreign
trained dentists.
6:04:50 PM
JIM TOWLE, Executive Director, Alaska Dental Society, testified via
teleconference from an offnet site and voiced being unfamiliar with
the bill pertaining to foreign trained medical doctors. He
understood that currently a dentist could not get licensed in the
State of Alaska unless they had graduated from a dental school
accredited by the Commission of Dental Accreditation, which is a
quasi-governmental operation supported by the American Dental
Association.
In response to a question from Co-Chair Green, Mr. Towle stated
that in order to be licensed in the State of Alaska, a dentist must
be a graduate of a school in either the United States or Canada
that is accredited by the Commission. Therefore a graduate of a
foreign dental school would be ineligible to be licensed as a
dentist in Alaska unless they had attended and graduated from one
of the accredited schools.
Co-Chair Green asked whether Mr. Towle was aware of the legislation
that had recently been passed regarding medical doctor licensure in
the State.
Mr. Towle communicated that he was unaware of that legislation.
Co-Chair Green stated therefore, that the question is whether that
legislation would affect the licensure of foreign trained dentists.
Senator Olson conveyed that that bill pertained to medical
doctors/physicians.
Co-Chair Green asked whether that terminology might include a
Doctor of Dentistry (DDS).
Mr. Towle responded that some dentists "are duel degreed" as a
DDS/MD.
Senator Olson, who was a medical doctor, affirmed that only a
DDS/MD would be affected by the legislation on foreign trained
medical doctors.
Co-Chair Green acknowledged. She noted that were this an issue with
dentists, it could be addressed separately.
Co-Chair Wilken moved to report the bill from Committee with
individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objections, CS HB 211(FIN) was REPORTED from
Committee with fiscal note #1 dated March 29,2005 from the
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development. This
note depicts an expense of $124,100 in fiscal year FY 07.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|