Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 106
02/15/2010 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB297 | |
| HB206 | |
| HB297 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 297 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 206 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 206-HIGH SCHOOL ASSESSM'T/POSTSECONDARY CLASS
9:53:36 AM
CHAIR SEATON announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 206 "An Act establishing a career assessment
requirement in public schools; and relating to postsecondary
courses for secondary school students."
9:53:50 AM
CHAIR SEATON reminded the committee that the questions for
Department of Education and Early Development were regarding
aligning WorkKeys with state standards and a national evaluation
that might align with college entrance scores.
9:54:33 AM
LES MORSE, Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner,
Department of Education and Early Development (EED), stated that
he previously served for five years as the Director of
Assessment and Accountability in the department. He offered to
discuss previous questions the committee had on WorkKeys and
state standards. He began by addressing the question on
WorkKeys relative to the alignment to the state standards. The
department previously reviewed the competencies that are tested
on WorkKeys and have compared them to the competencies tested in
the state's testing program. He stated that most of the
competencies assessed on WorkKeys match and offered to provide a
chart to lend clarity. Most of the standards match and many are
slightly lower on the WorkKeys than the requirement on the High
School Graduation Qualifying Exam (HSGQE), but about 4 of 24
language arts standards are slightly higher than those required
on the testing program at the HSGQE level. In terms of the math
standards, the 17 math standards tested in WorkKeys do not
appear to be more difficult than those in the HSGQE, he stated.
9:56:46 AM
CHAIR SEATON offered his belief that WorkKeys has various
levels, and asked whether the highest level of attainment on
WorkKeys is equivalent or slightly below the minimum competency
on the graduation requirements.
MR. MORRIS clarified that excludes the Platinum level, which is
a newer level not available for comparison at the time the study
was done. There are four levels on the WorkKeys: Bronze,
Silver, Gold, and Platinum. Since the Platinum level is so new
information was not available for comparison, but he anticipated
that Platinum level would be above the others. The concepts
will be similar concepts but may be more challenging in the
higher level. However, none of the concepts would be different
than curriculum taught, although the rigor might be different.
9:58:06 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON asked whether a student who is working
towards the Platinum level would know the standards of the
Platinum level.
MR. MORSE remarked he could only speculate, but he imagined the
Platinum level would be the higher level of mathematics required
in the higher level work and career areas.
9:59:04 AM
MR. MORSE related that the same analysis is not available
regarding the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) or the American
College Test (ACT). The SAT does indicate first year college
success primarily via the written essay activity, followed by
the high school GPA, the SAT math, critical reading, and
advanced placement (AP) exam performance. The SAT study
consisted of 150,000 students, which provided research data to
support their findings. The study also looked at gender bias or
ethnicity and determined the test to be fair for predictive
uses. In response to Representative P. Wilson, Mr. Morse noted
the fourth indicator was AP exam performance, which is a product
of the same company.
10:01:04 AM
MR. MORSE pointed out that the ACT publications speak to the
importance of rigor of courses beyond the core as being highly
predictive of first year college performance. Finally, neither
of the test publishers suggests using a score of a test alone as
a predictor. Thus, the department is looking at a combination
of factors, including a test score, grades, and rigor of the
courses. The score alone would be a misuse of the score, per
the publishers, since courses taken and GPA would also be
relevant. On the topic of cut scores, Mr. Morse said that not
enough work has been done at this time on cut scores on the
exams to share, but the department would certainly review data
from Alaskan students. Students currently take the SAT/ACT
throughout the state and enough have taken the WorkKeys exam so
performance levels can be considered. The state does not
receive individual student assessment results in terms of the
SAT/ACT but can work with the publisher to establish the
appropriate level for a cut score and make necessary decisions.
He cautioned that the decisions would not be isolated decisions,
but would be made in combination with course work taken and the
GPA.
10:02:52 AM
CHAIR SEATON asked whether comparisons by other states are
available that can indicate WorkKeys versus the SAT/ACT scores.
MR. MORSE responded he will work with the publisher as he is
certain the information will be available. He offered to
provide it to the committee.
CHAIR SEATON pointed out that this information will be helpful
for the integration of WorkKeys into the high school curriculum
since every 11th grader will be taking this test.
10:04:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER said that in general terms it would be
assumed that students who are performing at an A level would do
well on the SAT/ACT. She asked whether the department can
provide data indicating a correlation between classroom grades
and GPAs on standardized test scores.
MR. MORSE said he didn't know that information, but offered to
provide it to the committee if it is available.
CHAIR SEATON pointed out that a request has been made to analyze
the UA Scholar Program, which represents the top 10 percent of
students, and determine how these factors correlate to the
success of first year students and graduation from postsecondary
school.
[HB 206 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 297 Amendment #1.pdf |
HEDC 2/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/1/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 297 |
| HB 297 Amendment #2.pdf |
HEDC 2/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/1/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 297 |
| HB 297 material from EED.pdf |
HEDC 2/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 297 |