Legislature(1999 - 2000)
03/17/2000 02:18 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 204
"An Act relating to elk farming."
PETE FELLMAN, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS spoke in support
of HB 214. He explained that HB 204 is an effort to address
the needs of domesticated elk farmers in the state. The
Department of Fish and Game currently has the statutory
authority to regulate domesticated and wild elk stock. The
legislation would move the regulation of domesticated elk
into the Department of Natural Resources, Division of
Agriculture. The department, industry and the state
veterinarian support the legislation.
Vice Chair Bunde questioned the fiscal cost. Mr. Fellman
observed that farmers pay a $250 dollar annual fee for fence
inspections. The fiscal note covers $1.5 thousand dollars
for additional inspections.
Vice Chair Bunde maintained that the animals will escape and
asked if the Department of Natural Resources considered the
impact of escaped animals on other Alaskan resources.
CAROL CARROLL, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF SUPPORT SERVICES,
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES stated that the department
will inspect fences and issue licenses. She did not have
information on the impact of escaped animals. She pointed
out that there are already elk in Alaska.
Mr. Fellman emphasized that the animals are valuable and
estimated that owners would keep track of them. He added
that the animals would be tested for disease prior to their
importation.
Representative Phillips agreed that the farmers would not
risk losing the animals and noted the value of the elk.
Co-Chair Therriault pointed out that the Department of Fish
and Game supports the legislation.
In response to a question by Vice Chair Bunde, Mr. Fellman
observed that the Department of Fish and Game currently
regulates the animals. The intent is to transfer regulation
to the Department of Natural Resources
MARCIA WARD, WARD FARMS, DELTA JUNCTION testified via
teleconference in support of HB 204. She gave a brief
history of elk farming in Alaska. Ward Farms was begun on
the Kenai Peninsula in 1990. The legislation places domestic
elk farming in the Division of Agriculture, with other
domestic farm stock. She assured the Committee that fences
are adequate; the fences are eight feet high and made sturdy
enough to withstand: buffalo, elk, or deer. She added that
elk are territorial and maintained that an elk that escape
would attempt to return. Elk cost from $4,500 to $10,000
dollars each and are more valuable than beef cattle or
bison. Elks are tagged for identification. She pointed out
that elk have passed health inspections and stressed that
elk farmers are concerned that disease from wild Caribou
stock could infect their elk. Elk farmers pay a $250 dollar
fee every two years. She observed that they are the only
livestock industry that pays a licensing fee.
Representative Phillips spoke in support of the legislation.
She emphasized that the elk industry is successful and is
good for Alaska.
Representative Austerman asked if there had been problems
with bears. Ms. Ward noted that the elk are aggressive and
have repelled bears. She stressed that the fence can
withstand a tree falling on it and that there have been no
problems with predators.
Representative Austerman asked if wild Southeast elk could
be certified for domestication. Ms. Ward responded that she
did not think that the Department of Fish and Game would
allow wild elk to be domesticated. She stated that
veterinarians in the state could test them. She emphasized
that elk farms would quarantine wild elk before exposing
their domesticated herds.
In response to a question by Representative J. Davies, Ms.
Ward emphasized that it is easier to have all of the
regulations under one department. Branding and health
services are under the Department of Natural Resources,
while licensing and inspections were under the Department of
Fish and Game.
Ms. Ward noted that there are nine elk farmers in the state
and that the industry is growing.
Representative Foster MOVED to report CSHB 204 (RES) out of
Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
CSHB 204 (RES) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with three fiscal notes: a fiscal
impact note from the Department of Natural Resources; a
fiscal impact note from the Department of Fish and Game,
dated 3/8/00; and a zero fiscal note from the Department of
Environmental Conservation, dated 3/8/00.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|