Legislature(2017 - 2018)BARNES 124
04/26/2017 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB107 | |
| HB197 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 197 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 107 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 197-COMMUNITY SEED LIBRARIES
2:27:56 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 197, "An Act relating to the duties of the
commissioner of natural resources; relating to agriculture; and
relating to community seed libraries."
2:29:17 PM
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON moved to adopt the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 197, Version 30-LS0493\O, Wayne, 4/24/17,
as the working document.
CO-CHAIR TARR objected for discussion purposes.
2:29:48 PM
TERRANOVA TASKER, Staff, Representative Jennifer Johnston,
Alaska State Legislature, on behalf of Representative Johnston,
sponsor, explained that Version O amends section 4 to address
some of the issues brought up by the community and at the bill's
last hearing. She said [on page 3, lines 17-19 add language]
that would allow for personal noncommercial transfer of seeds.
This is the issue where someone's grandmother could give seeds
to her neighbors and it would not be in violation of any code or
regulation, but that would exist outside of the seed library.
On [page 4, lines 7-9 add language] that would allow for seeds
from a plant that is grown outside Alaska to be used in a seed
library as long as there is compliance with interstate transport
of commercial seeds. On page 4, line 15, would increase the
volume of seed sharing to one pound, which is in response to
public comment that the previous amount was not enough for those
seeds that are larger and heavier. On page 4, lines 27-30, add
language that would not allow anyone to use marijuana seeds as
it pertains to seed libraries because that is not the intent of
the bill.
2:31:56 PM
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON referenced a criticism by P.S. Holloway, who
asked why the bill is necessary when it is a deregulated process
now. Also, he continued, the current unregulated system is
free. He inquired as to why the current system isn't working.
MS. TASKER replied that this bill comes about because current
statute says any seed in the state must be regulated. Then,
going to code, there are two pages of regulation regarding
germination percentages, weights, and everything that is needed
for commercial operations. It seems to not be regulated based
on the interpretation of the [Department of Natural Resources
(DNR)], she said, so the bill carves out a section that seed
libraries can exist and then they can have control over what
goes on. She deferred to Mr. Rob Carter for further
explanation.
2:33:52 PM
ROB CARTER, manager, Plant Materials Center, Division of
Agriculture, DNR, responded that it is an unfortunate misnomer
from individuals who are not familiar with the current seed
regulations in Title 11 of the Alaska Administrative Code (AAC),
Chapter 34. He explained that multiple sections of this code
say that any seed transported around the state of Alaska for use
in planting, no matter the quantity, must meet the state's
labeling requirements for rigorous germination purity and
invasive weed testing. These requirements, he said, defeat the
purpose of noncommercial seed sharing because these individuals
have no intent to sell or generate revenue; they do it for rural
food security and genetic diversity. It is regulated, he
advised, but is not enforced by DNR upon Alaskans who are just
trying to provide closer, better, fresher food, and keep genetic
diversity among seeds within the state of Alaska.
2:35:47 PM
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON offered his understanding that Mr. Carter is
saying that this is more regulated than people believe, pursuant
to Title 11 of the Alaska Administrative Code. Therefore, this
legislation springs out of that regulation in a sense.
MR. CARTER answered correct; people don't understand that both
the Federal Seed Act and the accessory code regulate seed in
Alaska. But, he reiterated, it is not in the best interest of
the division [to enforce] because there are "bigger fish to
fry." Seed laws are passed with good intention, he said, and
have been around for a long time. It is just in recent years
that other states have been applying these laws to the
noncommercial seed sharing and seed libraries that are more fit
for consumer protection and protection of the farming community
and the agriculture industry, and applying those laws without
reason.
2:36:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked whether there is a difference
between "community seed library" and just "seed library."
MR. CARTER replied that there is no difference and that there is
a multitude of common names. People in the seed regulatory side
in the agricultural industry look at them as the noncommercial
seed sharing activities that are normally located within a
library, nonprofit, community organization, or a private
organization that has space to allow one.
2:38:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH observed that on page 3, lines 24-27 set
up a contrast between plants grown outside the state and inside
the state by saying, "outside the state, and imported into the
state in compliance with AS 03.05.010(a)(5); or [(2)] in the
state, and untreated with a substance toxic to humans, animals,
or pollinating insects." He inquired whether this statute
allows plants that are treated with substances toxic to humans,
animals, or pollinating insects.
MR. CARTER offered his belief that it does. He advised that
plants and seeds are very different critters when it comes to
the regulatory process. Speaking only to seeds, any seed
currently that is being made available for sale or offered for
sale must have that specifically on its label within the
package. In this case, it is not allowing that within community
seed libraries. He offered his professional opinion that these
labeling requirements be met, and that there be due diligence
because individuals in a free, noncommercial seed library may
have children there and sometimes the seed coatings that have
been treated with a pesticide are in bright colors. To remove
the possibility that an individual might get sick or very sick
and die from ingestion of those, he advised that it is in the
best interest of noncommercial use to not allow that within
noncommercial seed libraries.
2:40:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH agreed that a seed library shouldn't have
any seeds that have been treated with toxic substances. He said
he is having trouble seeing why seeds treated with toxic
substances should be allowed in community seed libraries if they
are coming from out of state. He requested Mr. Carter to
provide clarity in this regard.
MR. CARTER suggested Representative Parish talk with the bill
sponsor if he believes the language on page 3, lines 24-27, has
a loophole for out-of-state seed to be treated and shared with
community seed libraries. Mr. Carter said he thinks the
language could be interpreted either way.
2:42:01 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR surmised it would be difficult if a plant were
being brought into the state to be able to certify what happened
prior to it coming to Alaska.
MR. CARTER agreed it would be very difficult to regulate all
imported plants and said the Division of Agriculture does not
currently do that. He advised that many of the chemicals in the
systemic pesticides used to treat plants do not carry forth
within the progeny of the seed and he therefore doesn't think
that is a necessary step within this legislation.
2:42:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH said that if the provision that seeds from
outside the state should be similarly untreated it would seem
that a nationwide standard, such as organic, could be used to
avoid having to regulate every other state.
CO-CHAIR TARR advised there are imported vegetable starts that
are organic, but said it would be very difficult to do this with
flowers or other showy plants because she cannot think of any
opportunity to purchase certified organic garden landscaping
plants. She requested Mr. Carter's comment in this regard.
MR. CARTER agreed with Co-Chair Tarr. He advised that the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) organic standard is a USDA
program and therefore putting that type of language within
legislation could be very limiting. He said he thinks it is up
to the individual seed person to do their due diligence to
provide the seed that is best for the community. He cautioned
that the organic label is something to be very "wise" about.
2:44:52 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR removed her objection to adopting Version O as the
working document. There being no further objection, Version O
was before the committee.
2:45:18 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR reopened public testimony.
2:45:29 PM
DEIRDRE HELFFREICH testified that there is a need for this bill
simply to establish the legality of community seed libraries.
There is a difference between a seed library and a seed bank,
she pointed out. The seed vault in Norway holds germplasm for
particular individuals or companies. They are required to share
the first generation with other researchers, but otherwise the
seeds are held in deep freeze like would be done in a living
museum. A seed library is trying to establish living plants
that have adapted to a certain area, and to increase
biodiversity, educate the community, and help fellow gardeners.
MS. HELFFREICH stated she has some concerns with Version O. She
drew attention to the provision in [subsection] (c) that begins
on page 3, line 30, and which states, "Seed given, exchanged, or
offered for giving or exchange under (b) of this section must be
packaged for sale and labeled with ...." She said the [five]
labeling requirements that follow [on page 4, lines 1-6,] would
put an undue burden on seed libraries and would result in yet
another volunteer event that a seed library would have to do.
She noted she is speaking for herself, but that she was the
founder of the seed library in Ester. She also pointed out that
the provision refers to sellers and packaging for sale and is
contradicted by [paragraph] (5) on page 4, lines 5-6, which
state, "the statement Not authorized for commercial use and not
classified, graded, or inspected by the State of Alaska." She
said there is an inherent contradiction and that part of the
provision looks like it is created for sellers and part of it
looks like it is created for individuals and organizations
giving seeds.
MS. HELFFREICH further pointed out that making organizations
responsible for keeping track of how much a person receives in a
year, or just receives, is problematic. She also stated that
the labeling requirement on page 4, line 2, to include the
seller's name and address, would result in fewer people
participating in these organizations.
MS. HELFFREICH said she has 14 years of professional experience
working as the science editor at the University of Alaska
Fairbanks (UAF) School of Natural Resources and Agricultural
Sciences. She noted she has submitted written testimony and
reiterated her appreciation for the bill.
2:51:21 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR advised that the committee intends to consider an
amendment that would address in part Ms. Helffreich's concern
about the seller's name and address. Regarding the tracking of
weight, she noted that Version O raises the weight to one pound.
She asked whether this would address Ms. Helffreich's concern or
whether her concern is that tracking the cumulative amount would
be challenging.
MS. HELFFREICH replied that her concern is the idea of having to
track [the weight].
2:51:36 PM
JAN FLORA testified she appreciates HB 197 and Version O because
it would help with Alaska's food security concern and would
build community resilience. She said that until she read the
bill she had no idea that seed savers and seed swappers were
outlawed. She noted Homer has over 200 high tunnels, the most
in any zip code in the entire U.S. Small agriculture is booming
in Homer, she continued, and people in Homer want to build a
seed library, so the bill would help with this and would help
the Homer community grow more food for its families.
2:53:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH referred to the concern that the packaging
requirements would be a burden to seed libraries. He requested
Ms. Flora's thoughts in this regard.
MS. FLORA responded that she concurs with the witness expressing
this concern. She said she doesn't want to put her name and
address on the seeds. The seeds are swapped with friends and it
is known where they go. She suggested that for purposes of a
community seed library, perhaps a binder could be kept, and a
code put on the packages for tracking where the seeds come from,
so there is some capability of tracing seeds. She noted the
bill states that DNR should publish where the seed libraries
are; however, she continued, DNR already publishes a directory
for Alaska Grown that lists all the farmers and stock growers
that voluntarily want to be in the directory. She suggested
that this directory would be a good place to publish seed
library information.
2:55:17 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR closed public testimony.
2:55:35 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR moved to adopt Amendment 1, labeled 30-LS0493\O.1,
Shutts, 4/26/17, which read:
Page 3, line 31:
Delete "for sale"
Page 4, line 2:
Delete "seller's name and address"
Insert "name and address of the person giving or
offering the seed"
Page 4, line 3:
Delete "for sale"
Page 4, lines 7 - 9:
Delete all material.
Page 4, lines 12 - 14:
Delete "(1) that is harvested from a plant grown
outside the state unless the seed is in the original
packaging in which it was imported into the state;
(2)"
Page 4, lines 22 - 23:
Delete "AS 03.20.110 - 03.20.160"
Insert "AS 03.20.110 - 03.20.150"
Page 5, lines 3 - 4:
Delete all material.
2:55:46 PM
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON objected for discussion purposes.
2:55:50 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR explained that Amendment 1 would, in part, address
the issue of information that is required. She said the
amendment would remove some of the confusion about "the sale
element of it" by deleting the words "for sale" on page 3, line
31. Thus, line 31 would read, "section must be packaged and
labeled with". She said Amendment 1 would also do the
following:
• delete from page 4, line 2, the words "seller's name and
address" and insert "name and address of the person giving
or offering the seed"
• delete from page 4, line 3, the words "for sale"
• delete all the language [of subsection (d)] on page 4,
lines 7-9, to get at some of the issue about where seed was
grown
• delete all the language on page 4, lines 12-14
• change the statutory reference on page 4, lines 22-23
• delete all the language on page 5, lines 3-4
2:57:39 PM
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON asked why the definition of "exchange" would
not be needed.
MS. TASKER answered that because the bill's language has been
cleaned up with the removal of buy or sell, Legislative Legal
Services has advised that "exchange" does not need to be
defined.
CO-CHAIR TARR stated that a conceptual amendment to Amendment 1
could be considered regarding the name and address of the person
giving or offering the seed. She requested Mr. Carter's
thoughts about the suggestion that this information could be
held in a binder, so it would be available, but not physically
on the package, in order to address the concerns of those people
not wanting to give out their personal information [on the
package].
MR. CARTER answered he thinks removal of that language would
simplify that process. He offered his belief that, from a seed
regulatory aspect, as long as there was a sign above the seed
library itself with the name and address of the seed library
above the seed sharing activities within that facility, it would
meet the requirements of this legislation.
2:59:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH, in response to Mr. Carter's answer,
offered his understanding that from the point of view of the
department it would be sufficient to have the name and address
of the seed library rather than the provider of the original
seed.
MR. CARTER replied that is correct.
CO-CHAIR TARR clarified that the name and address would be
specific to the seed library, not specific to the individual
person.
3:00:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER asked who is responsible if the address
of the seller is on the packet.
CO-CHAIR TARR responded the name and address could be the seed
library and location, rather than the name of the person who
donated the seeds to that library.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER asked who would be responsible and who
would be contacted in case of problems if it is the name and
address of the seed library, not the [seed] producer.
MS. TASKER replied that the purpose of creating a community seed
library is that it gives the department a place to go if there
is a problem, and allows some path for tracking if need be. In
the smaller communities, regardless of whether someone's name
and address were written down, the community members would
likely know who is giving what seeds. She deferred to Mr.
Carter to answer the question further.
MR. CARTER responded that who is liable is a difficult question
and he is not sure what [a seed library's] liability would be.
If the issue was an invasive weed, or marijuana seed was being
exchanged, or another item that this legislation made
inapplicable [to current regulation], it would be the
responsibility of the seed library to stop that activity.
3:02:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WESTLAKE stated the intent of the bill is to
allow people to exchange seeds.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON thanked the bill sponsor for her hard
work and response to people's opinions by rewriting the bill.
She said that while the state must do due diligence when it
comes to invasive species and so on, people will continue to
share seeds. She expressed her support for the bill.
3:04:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND moved to adopt Conceptual Amendment 1 to
Amendment 1, to change line 6 to read as follows:
Insert "name of seed library giving or offering the
seed"
CO-CHAIR TARR objected for discussion purposes. Drawing
attention to page 3, line 20, Version O, she pointed out that
Section 03.20.120 is the community seed library section. So,
she said, while it says the name and address of the person
giving or offering the seed, it is supposed to mean the
community seed library because it is in that section.
3:05:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND addressed her proposed conceptual
amendment to Amendment 1. She noted that the objection heard in
testimony was that people didn't want the name and address of
the giver of the seed. The suggestion heard in conversation was
replace the giver's name and address with the name of the seed
library that was the source of the seed.
CO-CHAIR TARR explained that the way the language is currently
written, it actually is the community seed library. She said
Conceptual Amendment 1 to Amendment 1 could be considered for
points of clarity, but asked whether Representative Drummond
would like to remove the word "address".
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND asked whether the seed library is being
referred to as the person.
CO-CHAIR TARR answered yes.
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND further addressed her conceptual
amendment to Amendment 1. She said it should only say the name
of the seed library. If the community being talked about is
Ester, for example, Mr. Carter will know it is the seed library
in Ester. Also, as stated in testimony, it would take half a
page in the [Alaska Grown directory] to list all the seed
libraries. She stated she is trying to address the concerns of
the testifiers and the concern she heard loud and clear is that
they do not want their names and addresses distributed. The
seed library should be tracking these things and if there is an
issue with the seed and there is a need to find out from whom it
came, the seed library can be responsible for tracking that.
3:07:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JENNIFER JOHNSTON, Alaska State Legislature,
sponsor, offered her opinion that the language should be left as
is because there are opportunities for individuals to act in an
exchange where it might still be wanted to have the individual's
name and address there versus just the seed library.
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH spoke in support of Conceptual Amendment 1
to Amendment 1. It would be adequate, he continued, to say that
a community seed library should make reasonable accommodations
for participants to know X, Y, and Z, to avoid having to
individually label each package.
CO-CHAIR TARR restated Conceptual Amendment 1 to Amendment 1 as
follows: On line 6, after "name" insert "of the community seed
library" and delete "and address of the person". Thus, line 6
would read, "name of the community seed library giving or
offering the seed."
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND confirmed the restatement as correct.
3:09:26 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR removed her objection. There being no other
objection, Conceptual Amendment 1 to Amendment 1 was adopted.
3:09:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH noted that Amendment 1 removes a couple of
restrictions on seeds that originate out of state, one of those
being that the seeds should be in their original packaging.
Removal of these restrictions, he said, makes him less
comfortable with the bill, particularly for setting a number of
other requirements on it, in which the origin of the seed could
be lost. He reiterated his earlier concern that if it is going
to be made unclear which seeds are coming from instate and which
seeds are not, it only makes it more important that they be held
to the same standards with regard to toxins. With the amendment
as offered, he posited, there is no reason why seeds treated
with neonicotinoids, for example, couldn't be passed off in a
community seed library.
MS. TASKER said she and Mr. Carter talked about the removal of
that specific language, "the original packaging", and this
language would make this process more complicated for people
trying to share seeds. She offered her understanding that a
seed going out of any state must still comply with the Federal
Seed Act and there still are safeguards to prevent harmful seeds
from going one place to another without any control. So, she
continued, [Amendment 1] would not remove any safeguards, rather
it is an access issue.
3:12:11 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR rescinded her motion to move Amendment 1.
[HB 197 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 107 Amendment 1 on 4.21.17.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Opposing Document - Letter in Opposition 4.25.17_Redacted.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Opposing Document - Letter in Opposition Rinella 4.25.17.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Opposing Document - Letter in Opposition Adkison 4.25.17.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Gary Martinek's comments about KRSA opposing comments 4-25-17.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB 107 Amendment 2 on 4.25.17.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Opposing Document - Trout Unlimited Letter 4.25.17.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Additional Documentation. Considerations for Salmon Restoration Planning.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Additional Documents, Josephson Permitting process letter.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Additional Documentation. Egg Survival Rate Comparrison.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Fiscal Note DFG-DCF-02-24-17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Gulkana Incubation Picture.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Moist air incubator picture.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Sponsor Statement 2.8.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Support ADN Article.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Support Copper Valley Chamber of Commerce.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Support Doyon 2.14.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Support Mentasta Council.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Support Nenana City School District 2.16.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Support Pete Velsko.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Ver O.PDF |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Sectional Analysis 2.8.2017.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB107 Explanation of Changes O to U.pdf |
HFSH 4/18/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 ver U.pdf |
HFSH 4/18/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Supporting Document SEAFA 4.6.17.pdf |
HFSH 4/18/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB 107 Sponsor Statement 2.8.17.pdf |
HRES 4/19/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB107 Opposing Document Friccero.pdf |
HFSH 4/18/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |
| HB 197 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/19/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/28/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 197 |
| HB197 Version J 4.5.2017.pdf |
HRES 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/19/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/28/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 197 |
| HB197 Sectional Analysis ver J 4.6.2017.pdf |
HRES 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/19/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/28/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 197 |
| HB197 Fiscal Note - DNR-PMC 4.7.17.pdf |
HRES 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/19/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/28/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 197 |
| HB197 Supporting Document - Article. Seed Bill 4.9.17.pdf |
HRES 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/17/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/19/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/28/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 197 |
| HB197. Version O.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/28/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 197 |
| Explanation of Changes. HB197. Version O.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/28/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 5/1/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 197 |
| HB107 Opposition Documents - Letters of Opposition 4.26.17.pdf |
HRES 4/26/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 107 |