Legislature(2011 - 2012)HOUSE FINANCE 519
03/20/2012 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB196 | |
| HB261 | |
| HB358 | |
| HB337 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 221 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 196 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 261 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 337 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 358 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 196
"An Act relating to the power project fund and to the
bulk fuel revolving loan fund; establishing a bulk
fuel loan account and making the bulk fuel loan
account and the bulk fuel bridge loan account separate
accounts in the bulk fuel revolving loan fund;
providing for technical assistance to rural borrowers
under the bulk fuel bridge loan program; relating to
the administration and investment of the bulk fuel
revolving loan fund by the division in the Department
of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development
responsible for community and regional affairs; and
providing for an effective date."
1:40:36 PM
Vice-Chair Fairclough MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee
substitute for HB 196, Work Draft 27-LS0529\I
(Kirsch/Nauman, 3/20/12) as a working document.
Co-Chair Stoltze OBJECTED for the purpose of discussion.
JOE MICHEL, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE BILL STOLTZE, explained
the additions in the new CS and stated that it offered two
changes from the previous version, which committee members
had examined earlier in the day. He pointed to page 7 of
the bill and related that the effective date was changed to
January 1, 2013 from January 1, 2012.
Co-Chair Stoltze inquired why the date change was
necessary. Mr. Michel replied that certain regulations
needed to be adopted and that the additional year would
provide the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic
Development (DCCED) with time to make the changes.
Co-Chair Stoltze WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
further OBJECTION, Work Draft 27-LS0529\I was ADOPTED.
REPRESENTATIVE BRYCE EDGMON, SPONSOR, hoped that Mr. Teal's
upcoming discussion on the new fiscal notes would resolve
concerns that the notes should reflect the "streamlining of
the process" that HB 196 was attempting to achieve.
DAVID TEAL, DIRECTOR, LEGISLATIVE FINANCE DIVISION,
discussed the three fiscal notes and related that he had
been working on the notes at the behest of the sponsor in
order to make them appear the way the committee had
expected. He explained that the bill consolidated the
Bridge and Bulk Fuel Loan programs into a single location
and discussed the first fiscal note for the Alaska Energy
Authority (AEA). The AEA note was similar to how it had
originally appeared and reflected a loss of revenue in the
amount of $57,000 per year because the bill eliminated the
application and origination fees that were associated with
the loan program; the $57,000 would go back into general
fund. The second change in the AEA note was that the
$53,600 in administrative or operating costs that were
associated with the loan program would go away from AEA's
budget and would essentially be removed from the process.
The second fiscal note from AEA was for DCCED's Division of
Investments; instead of containing the $86,000 that was in
the original fiscal note, the new note directed the $53,600
that used to be in AEA to the Division of Investments. He
stated that because AEA would be retaining its position and
also because the Division of Investments wanted to add a
position, the funding for an additional position was kept
in the fiscal note. He mentioned that although the money
would not fully fund the position, the program should not
require a dedicated, full-time position. He observed that
the cost of the additional position in the Division of
Investments would be charged directly to the Bulk Fuel
Revolving Loan Fund, instead of going through the Division
of Community and Regional Affairs (DCRA); costs for
additional positions used to appear as inter-agency
receipts, but now the position could be direct charged to
the program. He related that the third fiscal note for the
Division of Investments was zeroed out and did not need to
be transmitted with the bill. He explained that the note
was zeroed because DCRA currently provided technical
assistance to communities that were applying for loans and
that it would continue to do so; DCRA would still be
helping people with bridge loans, while the bulk full loans
would be handled by the Division of Investments. He
observed that the third fiscal note originally had the
costs of technical assistance changing from the general
funds to the Bulk Fuel Loan Program, but that the
Legislative Finance Division did not see any reason to do
it this way because it was DCRA's role to assist
communities.
1:46:53 PM
AT EASE
1:47:20 PM
RECONVENED
Mr. Teal made a correction to his previous statement
regarding the third fiscal note and clarified that it was
the DCRA fiscal note that had been zeroed and did not need
to be transmitted with the bill; the Division of
Investments' note still reflected $53,600. He summarized
that the net change in operating cost was zero, but that
there was an annual loss in general fund revenue of
$57,000.
Vice-Chair Fairclough inquired if the Division of
Investments' note could be structured to fund the position
at a .50 full-time equivalent (FTE). She observed that the
new position was only being partially funded and wondered
whether the fiscal note should reflect that aspect in order
to inform the department of what the expectations were
regarding its role in funding the position. She queried if
there were receipts or other dollars that might be
available to "backfill" the position if a full FTE was
included in the fiscal note. Mr. Teal replied that a half-
time position could be added, but that if the Division of
Investments needed a position, it would have to hire a
full-time one. He observed that the Division of Investments
had requested $86,000 for the position, but that the fiscal
note only funded $53,600; in order to get the rest of the
funding, the division would have to pull money from other
loan programs. He stated that the fiscal note funded a
half-time to three-quarter-time position, but that the note
could be changed to reflect a half-time position if the
committee so desired; however, changing the position's
classification did not make a lot of difference.
1:50:42 PM
AT EASE
1:50:57 PM
RECONVENED
Vice-Chair Fairclough wondered whether the committee should
consider additional funding or compensation in the
legislation for the development of regulations. She noted
that the bill was asking for consolidation and was
providing money for a half-time FTE; however, the
department would be required to make new regulations, which
would take time and money. She stated that when she had
originally examined the fiscal notes, she had wondered why
there was not more funding, given the additional work that
DCCED would have to complete. She concluded that the
department would need to provide information regarding the
regulations in an expedient manner and that additional
funding would probably be needed to do so.
Representative Edgmon stated that he had been an employee
of DCCED and had worked with the Division of Administration
to draft regulations; he recalled that the department had a
full-time staff that worked on regulations, but that there
might be a little more time involved with "other parts" of
HB 196.
1:52:11 PM
Vice-Chair Fairclough MOVED to report CSHB 196(FIN) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CSHB 196(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with three new fiscal impact notes
by the House Finance Committee for the Department of
Commerce, Community and Economic Development.
1:52:28 PM
AT EASE
1:55:05 PM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB221 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 3/20/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 221 |
| HB221 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 3/20/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 221 |
| HB221 Court Rule 39.1.pdf |
HFIN 3/20/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 221 |
| HB221 AS 18.85.120.docx |
HFIN 3/20/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 221 |
| HB358 CS WORKDRAFT 27-LS1406-I.pdf |
HFIN 3/20/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB196 CS WORKDRAFT 27-LS0529-I.pdf |
HFIN 3/20/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 196 |
| HB196 NEW FN-FIN-CED AEA 3.20.12pdf.pdf |
HFIN 3/20/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 196 |
| HB 196 NEW FN FIN CED INVESTMENTS 3.20.12pfd.1.pdf |
HFIN 3/20/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 196 |
| HB 196 NEW FN FIN CED CRA 3.20.12pfd.1.pdf |
HFIN 3/20/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 196 |
| 3 20 12 Summary of HB196 NEW Fiscal Notes.doc |
HFIN 3/20/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 196 |
| HB196 NEW FN-FIN-CED AEA 3.20.12pdf.pdf |
HFIN 3/20/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 196 |
| 3 20 12 Summary of HB196 NEW Fiscal Notes.doc |
HFIN 3/20/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 196 |