Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/18/2000 05:45 PM Senate RLS
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 191-CHARTER SCHOOLS CHAIRMAN KELLY informed Representative Dyson that the Anchorage School District has prepared an amendment to SCS CSHB 191(FIN). REPRESENTATIVE FRED DYSON, sponsor of HB 191, said that the charter school law in Alaska is one of the weakest in the nation. When it was enacted in 1995, proponents believed it would have to be revisited. This bill does four relatively uncontroversial things. It extends the contract periods; it doubles the cap and removes the geographic requirements; it removes the sunset provision; and it allows for a waiver by the fire marshall of public school safety requirements. His original intent was to also open up the accounting process so that charter school negotiators could see where the money they get or do not get comes from. That provision was problematic because a number of school districts said they are unable to provide that information. The remaining noncontroversial parts of the bill must pass this session to enable some charter schools to continue. The Department of Education and Early Development and the State Board of Education recommended the version before the committee [SCS CSHB 191(FIN)] but there is a strong case to remove a portion of the bill. SENATOR LEMAN asked Representative Dyson what his recommendation is. REPRESENTATIVE DYSON responded that he would "stand pat" but he admitted the Anchorage School District has a good argument. CHAIRMAN KELLY asked if Representative Dyson would prefer to stand pat on this bill and look at the argument at a future time. REPRESENTATIVE DYSON replied, "I would, but they make a good case, they may be right." Number 181 KATHI GILLESPIE, Co-Chair of the Legislative Subcommittee of the Anchorage School District, expressed the school district's concerns with SCS CSHB 191(FIN). The school district recommends the deletion of Section 4(e) on page 3, lines 6-11. Section 4(e) reads: (e) In addition to the amount provided to an approved charter school in the annual program budget under (a) of this section, a charter school budget must include an allocation equal to the amount determined by dividing the amount of local revenues contributed under AS 14.17.410(c) by the average daily membership of the district and multiplying that number by the average daily membership of the charter school. The school district's concern with Section 4(e) is that it sets a precedent for funding charter school students in a different manner than funding for all other school district students. This section basically says that charter school students will not be held accountable for contributing to districtwide operations and services. Currently, local funding is distributed in the following manner: the local funding is received and the four mills is contributed for all students, including charter school students, in order to access foundation formula monies. The school district has some discretion with the remainder of those monies to address the needs of students in specific schools. It is true that an equal amount is not spent on each student in the Anchorage School District. The amount spent depends on the location, whether the student is at risk, the income level of the family and other factors. It does cost the district more to educate some students than others. The district is concerned that this bill will set a precedent so that some students can say they get their portion first and that they do not have to contribute to the discretionary amount that is distributed according to need. That precedent will allow neighborhood schools to demand the same treatment. The district has never funded public education this way; it has always had the discretion to spend the money to bring all students up to a particular standard. The district fears that if Section 4(e) is left in the bill, it will negate the school district's ability to do that. MS. GILLESPIE asked committee members to delete Section 4(e) and noted the district has offered to work with Representative Dyson over the summer on the issue of funding for charter school students. She noted that the four charter schools in the Anchorage School District are still functioning; three are thriving. The one school that is having significant problems is Walden, located in the Dimond Mall. That school's problems are rooted in the fact that it has not met the 200 student limit required for the foundation formula. The Anchorage School District supports charter schools and will continue to do so. SENATOR ELLIS moved the amendment to delete Section 4 on page 3, lines 6 through 11. The motion failed with Senators Leman, Pearce and Kelly voting "nay," and Senators Ellis and Miller voting "yea." SENATOR LEMAN moved to calendar all Senate versions of HB 191 for calendaring at the Chairman's discretion. Without objection, the motion carried.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|