Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/18/2000 05:45 PM Senate RLS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 191-CHARTER SCHOOLS
CHAIRMAN KELLY informed Representative Dyson that the Anchorage
School District has prepared an amendment to SCS CSHB 191(FIN).
REPRESENTATIVE FRED DYSON, sponsor of HB 191, said that the charter
school law in Alaska is one of the weakest in the nation. When it
was enacted in 1995, proponents believed it would have to be
revisited. This bill does four relatively uncontroversial things.
It extends the contract periods; it doubles the cap and removes the
geographic requirements; it removes the sunset provision; and it
allows for a waiver by the fire marshall of public school safety
requirements. His original intent was to also open up the
accounting process so that charter school negotiators could see
where the money they get or do not get comes from. That provision
was problematic because a number of school districts said they are
unable to provide that information. The remaining noncontroversial
parts of the bill must pass this session to enable some charter
schools to continue. The Department of Education and Early
Development and the State Board of Education recommended the
version before the committee [SCS CSHB 191(FIN)] but there is a
strong case to remove a portion of the bill.
SENATOR LEMAN asked Representative Dyson what his recommendation
is.
REPRESENTATIVE DYSON responded that he would "stand pat" but he
admitted the Anchorage School District has a good argument.
CHAIRMAN KELLY asked if Representative Dyson would prefer to stand
pat on this bill and look at the argument at a future time.
REPRESENTATIVE DYSON replied, "I would, but they make a good case,
they may be right."
Number 181
KATHI GILLESPIE, Co-Chair of the Legislative Subcommittee of the
Anchorage School District, expressed the school district's concerns
with SCS CSHB 191(FIN). The school district recommends the
deletion of Section 4(e) on page 3, lines 6-11. Section 4(e)
reads:
(e) In addition to the amount provided to an approved charter
school in the annual program budget under (a) of this section,
a charter school budget must include an allocation equal to
the amount determined by dividing the amount of local revenues
contributed under AS 14.17.410(c) by the average daily
membership of the district and multiplying that number by the
average daily membership of the charter school.
The school district's concern with Section 4(e) is that it sets a
precedent for funding charter school students in a different manner
than funding for all other school district students. This section
basically says that charter school students will not be held
accountable for contributing to districtwide operations and
services. Currently, local funding is distributed in the following
manner: the local funding is received and the four mills is
contributed for all students, including charter school students, in
order to access foundation formula monies. The school district has
some discretion with the remainder of those monies to address the
needs of students in specific schools. It is true that an equal
amount is not spent on each student in the Anchorage School
District. The amount spent depends on the location, whether the
student is at risk, the income level of the family and other
factors. It does cost the district more to educate some students
than others. The district is concerned that this bill will set a
precedent so that some students can say they get their portion
first and that they do not have to contribute to the discretionary
amount that is distributed according to need. That precedent will
allow neighborhood schools to demand the same treatment. The
district has never funded public education this way; it has always
had the discretion to spend the money to bring all students up to
a particular standard. The district fears that if Section 4(e) is
left in the bill, it will negate the school district's ability to
do that.
MS. GILLESPIE asked committee members to delete Section 4(e) and
noted the district has offered to work with Representative Dyson
over the summer on the issue of funding for charter school
students. She noted that the four charter schools in the Anchorage
School District are still functioning; three are thriving. The one
school that is having significant problems is Walden, located in
the Dimond Mall. That school's problems are rooted in the fact
that it has not met the 200 student limit required for the
foundation formula. The Anchorage School District supports charter
schools and will continue to do so.
SENATOR ELLIS moved the amendment to delete Section 4 on page 3,
lines 6 through 11. The motion failed with Senators Leman, Pearce
and Kelly voting "nay," and Senators Ellis and Miller voting "yea."
SENATOR LEMAN moved to calendar all Senate versions of HB 191 for
calendaring at the Chairman's discretion. Without objection, the
motion carried.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|