Legislature(1999 - 2000)
02/09/2000 01:45 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 191
"An Act relating to charter schools; and providing for
an effective date."
Co-Chair Therriault provided the Committee with information
regarding previous action taken by the Committee on HB 191.
He noted that the Committee on 2/7/00 adopted conceptional
Amendment 5. Members were provided with suggested by the
legislative auditor and legislative legal counsel to
implement Amendment 5:
AS 14.03.260 is amended by adding new subsection to
read:
(e) If a school district intends to charge a charter
school for services provided, then the school district
shall itemize the services provided to charter schools
in the district. The cost of the itemized services
shall be identified separately. The portion of costs
related to the charter school shall conform to the cost
principles as defined in United States Office of
Management and Budget Circular A-87 or be determined
using a cost allocation method mutually agreed to by
the school district and the charter school. In addition
to administration, services provided by a local school
district may include audio-visual services, curriculum,
staff development and training, special needs and
intensive services, transportation, procurement,
facility rental and other services that are agreed to
between the local school district and charter school.
Except for administration services, those services
required by law and other services with benefits that
are inseparable between the charter school and the
school district, a charter school may elect not to
receive services provided by a local school district.
MIKE TIBBLES, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE THERRIAULT explained
that the conceptual language in Amendment 5 attempted to tie
the list of exceptions to federal guidelines. The intent was
that the list of exceptions not be so specific that they run
counter to the federal guidelines. The amendment was
expanded to incorporate this intent. He summarized the
Amendment 5 as drafted by legal counsel. The amendment
would:
· Require itemization only if the district intends to
charge the charter school for the service. If the school
district has an extra room they could agree to let the
charter school use the room without accounting.
· Require the cost of the itemized services to be
identified separately.
· Require a cost allocation method that conforms to the
cost principles as defined in US 0MB Circular A-87 or
based upon a mutually agreed method between the charter
school and the school district. There may be a
methodology that is not included in the OMB Circular A-87
that the charter school and the school district can agree
on. The OMB Circular A-87 requires that services be
accounted for by the hour. School districts may use a
different system
· Clarify that administration is a service that a charter
school must receive.
· Replace language "district wide programs" with "services
with benefits that are inseparable between the charter
school and the school district" in list of services that
a charter school must receive. This language more
appropriately addresses the intent. If a charter school
is in a school facility the electric bill will be
inseparable.
CS HB 191 (FIN) was reported out of Committee on 2/07/00,
with a "do not pass" recommendation and with a fiscal note
by the Department of Education and Early Development.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|